618 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25336483)
1. Ultrafast 2-dimensional image monitoring and array-based passive cavitation detection for ultrasound contrast agent destruction in a variably sized region.
Xu S; Hu H; Jiang H; Xu Z; Wan M
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Nov; 33(11):1957-70. PubMed ID: 25336483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dual-high-frequency ultrasound excitation on microbubble destruction volume.
Shen CC; Su SY; Cheng CH; Yeh CK
Ultrasonics; 2010 Jun; 50(7):698-703. PubMed ID: 20193957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Identifying the inertial cavitation threshold and skull effects in a vessel phantom using focused ultrasound and microbubbles.
Tung YS; Choi JJ; Baseri B; Konofagou EE
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 May; 36(5):840-52. PubMed ID: 20420973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of acoustic insonation parameters on ultrasound contrast agent destruction.
Yeh CK; Su SY
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1281-91. PubMed ID: 18343019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimisation of the transmit beam parameters for generation of subharmonic signals in native and altered populations of a commercial microbubble contrast agent SonoVue®.
Ivory AM; Meaney JF; Fagan AJ; Browne JE
Phys Med; 2020 Feb; 70():176-183. PubMed ID: 32036334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Investigation on the inertial cavitation threshold and shell properties of commercialized ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles.
Guo X; Li Q; Zhang Z; Zhang D; Tu J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1622-31. PubMed ID: 23927202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A simple method for quantifying ultrasound-triggered microbubble destruction.
Hung SH; Yeh CK; Tsai TH; Chen T; Chen RC
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Jun; 37(6):949-57. PubMed ID: 21546152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spatiotemporal evolution of cavitation dynamics exhibited by flowing microbubbles during ultrasound exposure.
Choi JJ; Coussios CC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):3538-49. PubMed ID: 23145633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of ultrasound induced cavitation on magnetic resonance imaging contrast in the rat liver in the presence of macromolecular contrast agent.
Frulio N; Trillaud H; Deckers R; Lepreux S; Moonen C; Quesson B
Invest Radiol; 2010 May; 45(5):282-7. PubMed ID: 20375844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experimental investigations of nonlinearities and destruction mechanisms of an experimental phospholipid-based ultrasound contrast agent.
Casciaro S; Palmizio Errico R; Conversano F; Demitri C; Distante A
Invest Radiol; 2007 Feb; 42(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 17220727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro acoustic characterization of three phospholipid ultrasound contrast agents from 12 to 43 MHz.
Sun C; Sboros V; Butler MB; Moran CM
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Mar; 40(3):541-50. PubMed ID: 24361219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dynamic Behavior of Microbubbles during Long Ultrasound Tone-Burst Excitation: Mechanistic Insights into Ultrasound-Microbubble Mediated Therapeutics Using High-Speed Imaging and Cavitation Detection.
Chen X; Wang J; Pacella JJ; Villanueva FS
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Feb; 42(2):528-538. PubMed ID: 26603628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inertial cavitation threshold of nested microbubbles.
Wallace N; Dicker S; Lewin P; Wrenn SP
Ultrasonics; 2015 Apr; 58():67-74. PubMed ID: 25620709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro contrast-enhanced ultrasound measurements of capillary microcirculation: comparison between polymer- and phospholipid-shelled microbubbles.
Grishenkov D; Kari L; Brodin LK; Brismar TB; Paradossi G
Ultrasonics; 2011 Jan; 51(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 20542310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stable and transient subharmonic emissions from isolated contrast agent microbubbles.
Biagi E; Breschi L; Vannacci E; Masotti L
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2007 Mar; 54(3):480-97. PubMed ID: 17375818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A real-time controller for sustaining thermally relevant acoustic cavitation during ultrasound therapy.
Hockham N; Coussios CC; Arora M
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010 Dec; 57(12):2685-94. PubMed ID: 21156364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relationship between cavitation and loss of echogenicity from ultrasound contrast agents.
Radhakrishnan K; Bader KB; Haworth KJ; Kopechek JA; Raymond JL; Huang SL; McPherson DD; Holland CK
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6541-63. PubMed ID: 24002637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cavitation-enhanced extravasation for drug delivery.
Arvanitis CD; Bazan-Peregrino M; Rifai B; Seymour LW; Coussios CC
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1838-52. PubMed ID: 21963037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cavitation threshold of microbubbles in gel tunnels by focused ultrasound.
Sassaroli E; Hynynen K
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 33(10):1651-60. PubMed ID: 17590501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Thermal response of contrast agent microbubbles: preliminary results from physico-chemical and US-imaging characterization.
Guiot C; Pastore G; Napoleone M; Gabriele P; Trotta M; Cavalli R
Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e127-30. PubMed ID: 17056082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
