These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

472 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25336662)

  • 1. Efficacy and safety of remote magnetic catheter navigation vs. manual steerable sheath-guided ablation for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a case-control study.
    Koutalas E; Bertagnolli L; Sommer P; Richter S; Rolf S; Breithardt O; Bollmann A; Hindricks G; Arya A
    Europace; 2015 Feb; 17(2):232-8. PubMed ID: 25336662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Remote magnetic navigation versus manual catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A single center long-term comparison.
    Schlögl S; Schlögl KS; Haarmann H; Bengel P; Bergau L; Rasenack E; Hasenfuss G; Zabel M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2022 Jan; 45(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 34687054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Remote-controlled magnetic pulmonary vein isolation using a new three-dimensional non-fluoroscopic navigation system: a single-centre prospective study.
    Da Costa A; Ben H'dech M; Romeyer-Bouchard C; Bisch L; Gate-Martinet A; Levallois M; Isaaz K
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2013; 106(8-9):423-32. PubMed ID: 23906679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term outcomes of the current remote magnetic catheter navigation technique for ablation of atrial fibrillation.
    Yuan S; Holmqvist F; Kongstad O; Jensen SM; Wang L; Ljungström E; Hertervig E; Borgquist R
    Scand Cardiovasc J; 2017 Dec; 51(6):308-315. PubMed ID: 28958165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contact force sensing manual catheter versus remote magnetic navigation ablation of atrial fibrillation: a single-center comparison.
    Schlögl S; Schlögl KS; Bengel P; Haarmann H; Bergau L; Rasenack E; Hasenfuss G; Zabel M
    Heart Vessels; 2024 May; 39(5):427-437. PubMed ID: 38189924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Steerable versus nonsteerable sheath technology in atrial fibrillation ablation: a prospective, randomized study.
    Piorkowski C; Eitel C; Rolf S; Bode K; Sommer P; Gaspar T; Kircher S; Wetzel U; Parwani AS; Boldt LH; Mende M; Bollmann A; Husser D; Dagres N; Esato M; Arya A; Haverkamp W; Hindricks G
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2011 Apr; 4(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 21248246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Remote magnetic with open-irrigated catheter vs. manual navigation for ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Proietti R; Pecoraro V; Di Biase L; Natale A; Santangeli P; Viecca M; Sagone A; Galli A; Moja L; Tagliabue L
    Europace; 2013 Sep; 15(9):1241-8. PubMed ID: 23585253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Utilization of steerable sheath improves the efficiency of atrial fibrillation ablation guided by robotic magnetic navigation compared with fixed-curve sheath.
    Luo Q; Xie Y; Bao Y; Wei Y; Lin C; Zhang N; Ling T; Chen K; Pan W; Wu L; Jin Q
    Clin Cardiol; 2022 May; 45(5):482-487. PubMed ID: 35195273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Comparison of Remote Magnetic Irrigated Tip Ablation versus Manual Catheter Irrigated Tip Catheter Ablation With and Without Force Sensing Feedback.
    Weiss JP; May HT; Bair TL; Crandall BG; Cutler MJ; Day JD; Osborn JS; Mallender C; Bunch TJ
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2016 Mar; 27 Suppl 1():S5-S10. PubMed ID: 26969224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Steerable sheath catheter navigation for ablation of atrial fibrillation: a case-control study.
    Piorkowski C; Kottkamp H; Gerds-Li JH; Arya A; Sommer P; Dagres N; Esato M; Riahi S; Weiss S; Kircher S; Hindricks G
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2008 Jul; 31(7):863-73. PubMed ID: 18684284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Remote magnetic navigation versus manual control navigation for atrial fibrillation ablation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Jia K; Jin Q; Liu A; Wu L
    J Electrocardiol; 2019; 55():78-86. PubMed ID: 31152995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiofrequency atrial fibrillation ablation with irrigated tip catheter using remote magnetic navigation compared with conventional manual method.
    Ghadban R; Gifft K; Luebbering Z; Sodhi S; Cooper D; Enezate T
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2021 Oct; 62(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 32959178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term results and the predictors of outcome of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using steerable sheath catheter navigation after single procedure in 674 patients.
    Arya A; Hindricks G; Sommer P; Huo Y; Bollmann A; Gaspar T; Bode K; Husser D; Kottkamp H; Piorkowski C
    Europace; 2010 Feb; 12(2):173-80. PubMed ID: 19889688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Remote magnetic navigation facilitates the ablations of frequent ventricular premature complexes originating from the outflow tract and the valve annulus as compared to manual control navigation.
    Qiu X; Zhang N; Luo Q; Liu A; Ji Y; Ye J; Lin C; Ling T; Chen K; Pan W; Zhao J; Jin Q; Wu L
    Int J Cardiol; 2018 Sep; 267():94-99. PubMed ID: 29957265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feasibility and safety of remote-controlled magnetic navigation for ablation of atrial fibrillation.
    Katsiyiannis WT; Melby DP; Matelski JL; Ervin VL; Laverence KL; Gornick CC
    Am J Cardiol; 2008 Dec; 102(12):1674-6. PubMed ID: 19064022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using remote magnetic catheter navigation: a case-control study.
    Arya A; Zaker-Shahrak R; Sommer P; Bollmann A; Wetzel U; Gaspar T; Richter S; Husser D; Piorkowski C; Hindricks G
    Europace; 2011 Jan; 13(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 21149511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term efficacy of single procedure remote magnetic catheter navigation for ablation of ischemic ventricular tachycardia: a retrospective study.
    Dinov B; Schönbauer R; Wojdyla-Hordynska A; Braunschweig F; Richter S; Altmann D; Sommer P; Gaspar T; Bollmann A; Wetzel U; Rolf S; Piorkowski C; Hindricks G; Arya A
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2012 May; 23(5):499-505. PubMed ID: 22313170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Remote magnetic versus manual catheter navigation for circumferential pulmonary vein ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation.
    Lüthje L; Vollmann D; Seegers J; Dorenkamp M; Sohns C; Hasenfuss G; Zabel M
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2011 Nov; 100(11):1003-11. PubMed ID: 21706198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Remote magnetic catheter navigation for cavotricuspid isthmus ablation in patients with common-type atrial flutter.
    Vollmann D; Lüthje L; Seegers J; Hasenfuss G; Zabel M
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2009 Dec; 2(6):603-10. PubMed ID: 20009074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robotic magnetic navigation-guided catheter ablation establishes highly effective pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation when compared to conventional ablation techniques.
    Noten AME; Romanov A; De Schouwer K; Beloborodov V; Bhagwandien R; Hoogendijk MG; Mikheenko I; Wijchers S; Yap SC; Schwagten B; Szili-Torok T
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2023 Dec; 34(12):2472-2483. PubMed ID: 37767745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.