These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

472 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25336662)

  • 21. Does a patent foramen ovale matter when using a remote-controlled magnetic system for pulmonary vein isolation?
    Gate-Martinet A; Da Costa A; Romeyer-Bouchard C; Bisch L; Levallois M; Isaaz K
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2014 Feb; 107(2):88-95. PubMed ID: 24556188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Initial experience of a novel mapping system combined with remote magnetic navigation in the catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.
    Lin C; Pehrson S; Jacobsen PK; Chen X
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2017 Dec; 28(12):1387-1392. PubMed ID: 28862806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Efficacy and Safety of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Using Remote Magnetic Navigation: Experience from 1,006 Procedures.
    Jin QI; Pehrson S; Jacobsen PK; Chen XU
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2016 Mar; 27 Suppl 1():S23-8. PubMed ID: 26969219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of atrial fibrillation ablation efficacy using remote magnetic navigation vs. manual navigation with contact-force control.
    Jez J; Jadczyk T; Lehar F; Pesl M; Kulik T; Belaskova S; Soucek F; Caluori G; Wojakowski W; Starek Z
    Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2020 Dec; 164(4):387-393. PubMed ID: 31645769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Use of a contact force-sensing ablation catheter with advanced catheter location significantly reduces fluoroscopy time and radiation dose in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.
    Lee G; Hunter RJ; Lovell MJ; Finlay M; Ullah W; Baker V; Dhinoja MB; Sporton S; Earley MJ; Schilling RJ
    Europace; 2016 Feb; 18(2):211-8. PubMed ID: 26318548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Ablation of atrial fibrillation with cryoballoon or duty-cycled radiofrequency pulmonary vein ablation catheter: a randomized controlled study comparing the clinical outcome and safety; the AF-COR study.
    Malmborg H; Lönnerholm S; Blomström P; Blomström-Lundqvist C
    Europace; 2013 Nov; 15(11):1567-73. PubMed ID: 23703361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical research: remote magnetic navigation vs. manually controlled catheter ablation of right ventricular outflow tract arrhythmias: a retrospective study.
    Shauer A; De Vries LJ; Akca F; Palazzolo J; Shurrab M; Lashevsky I; Tiong I; Singh SM; Newman D; Szili-Torok T; Crystal E
    Europace; 2018 May; 20(suppl_2):ii28-ii32. PubMed ID: 29722855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Remotely controlled steerable sheath improves result and procedural parameters of atrial fibrillation ablation with magnetic navigation.
    Errahmouni A; Latcu DG; Bun SS; Rijo N; Dugourd C; Saoudi N
    Europace; 2015 Jul; 17(7):1045-50. PubMed ID: 25662989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: Electrical modification suggesting transmurality is faster achieved with remote magnetic catheter in comparison with contact force use.
    Bun SS; Ayari A; Latcu DG; Errahmouni A; Saoudi N
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2017 Jul; 28(7):745-753. PubMed ID: 28419605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Impact of steerable sheaths on contact forces and reconnection sites in ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation.
    Ullah W; Hunter RJ; McLean A; Dhinoja M; Earley MJ; Sporton S; Schilling RJ
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 25346514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Early and long-term outcomes after manual and remote magnetic navigation-guided catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia.
    Qian P; De Silva K; Kumar S; Nadri F; Samanta R; Bhaskaran A; Ross D; Sivagangabalan G; Cooper M; Kizana E; Davis L; Denniss AR; Thiagalingam A; Thomas S; Kovoor P
    Europace; 2018 May; 20(suppl_2):ii11-ii21. PubMed ID: 29722861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Atrial fibrillation ablation using remote magnetic navigation and the risk of atrial-esophageal fistula: international multicenter experience.
    Danon A; Shurrab M; Nair KM; Latcu DG; Arruda MS; Chen X; Szili-Torok T; Rossvol O; Wissner EE; Lashevsky I; Crystal E
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2015 Aug; 43(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 25935226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. General anesthesia is not superior to local anesthesia for remote magnetic ablation of atrial fibrillation.
    Bun SS; Latcu DG; Allouche E; Errahmouni A; Saoudi N
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2015 Mar; 38(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 25353088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: atrial fibrillation type determines the success rate.
    Derejko P; Polańska M; Chojnowska L; Michałowska I; Wójcik A; Piotrowicz E; Lech A; Kłopotowski M; Baranowski R; Przybylski A; Bilińska M; Sierpiński R; Walczak F; Szumowski L
    Kardiol Pol; 2013; 71(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 23348529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Multicenter, randomized comparison between magnetically navigated and manually guided radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (the MagMa-AVNRT-trial).
    Reents T; Jilek C; Schuster P; Nölker G; Koch-Büttner K; Ammar-Busch S; Semmler V; Bourier F; Kottmaier M; Kornmayer M; Brooks S; Fichtner S; Kolb C; Deisenhofer I; Hessling G
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2017 Dec; 106(12):947-952. PubMed ID: 28849269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Contact-force guided radiofrequency vs. second-generation balloon cryotherapy for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation-a prospective evaluation.
    Jourda F; Providencia R; Marijon E; Bouzeman A; Hireche H; Khoueiry Z; Cardin C; Combes N; Combes S; Boveda S; Albenque JP
    Europace; 2015 Feb; 17(2):225-31. PubMed ID: 25186456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Robotic navigation in catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: midterm efficacy and predictors of postablation arrhythmia recurrences.
    Hlivák P; Mlčochová H; Peichl P; Cihák R; Wichterle D; Kautzner J
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2011 May; 22(5):534-40. PubMed ID: 21091964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Pulmonary vein anatomy predicts freedom from atrial fibrillation using remote magnetic navigation for circumferential pulmonary vein ablation.
    Sohns C; Sohns JM; Bergau L; Sossalla S; Vollmann D; Lüthje L; Staab W; Dorenkamp M; Harrison JL; O'Neill MD; Lotz J; Zabel M
    Europace; 2013 Aug; 15(8):1136-42. PubMed ID: 23512156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A randomized trial to compare atrial fibrillation ablation using a steerable vs. a non-steerable sheath.
    Rajappan K; Baker V; Richmond L; Kistler PM; Thomas G; Redpath C; Sporton SC; Earley MJ; Harris S; Schilling RJ
    Europace; 2009 May; 11(5):571-5. PubMed ID: 19351628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Impact of catheter ablation with remote magnetic navigation on procedural outcomes in patients with persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation.
    Jin Q; Pehrson S; Jacobsen PK; Chen X
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2015 Nov; 44(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 26216480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.