224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25337227)
1. Prognostic role of microvessel density in patients with renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis.
Cheng SH; Liu JM; Liu QY; Luo DY; Liao BH; Li H; Wang KJ
Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2014; 7(9):5855-63. PubMed ID: 25337227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Neovascularity as a prognostic marker in renal cell carcinoma.
Bauman TM; Huang W; Lee MH; Abel EJ
Hum Pathol; 2016 Nov; 57():98-105. PubMed ID: 27436827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Immunohistochemical expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) does not correlate with microvessel density in renal cell carcinoma.
Raica M; Cimpean AM; Anghel A
Neoplasma; 2007; 54(4):278-84. PubMed ID: 17822316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microvascular density of regenerative nodule to small hepatocellular carcinoma by automated analysis using CD105 and CD34 immunoexpression.
Paschoal JP; Bernardo V; Canedo NH; Ribeiro OD; Caroli-Bottino A; Pannain VL
BMC Cancer; 2014 Feb; 14():72. PubMed ID: 24507660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lack of association of microvessel density with prognosis of renal cell carcinoma: evidence from meta-analysis.
Zhang B; Ji H; Yan D; Liu S; Shi B
Tumour Biol; 2014 Mar; 35(3):2769-76. PubMed ID: 24272081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pathological significance and prognostic role of microvessel density, evaluated using CD31, CD34, and CD105 in prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy with neoadjuvant therapy.
Miyata Y; Mitsunari K; Asai A; Takehara K; Mochizuki Y; Sakai H
Prostate; 2015 Jan; 75(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 25307287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Microvessel density assessment in benign and malignant endometrial changes.
Czekierdowski A; Czekierdowska S; Czuba B; Cnota W; Sodowski K; Kotarski J; Zwirska-Korczala K
J Physiol Pharmacol; 2008 Sep; 59 Suppl 4():45-51. PubMed ID: 18955753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microvessel Landscape Assessment in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Unclear Value of Targeting Endoglin (CD105) as Prognostic Factor of Clinical Outcome.
Lytras D; Leontara V; Kefala M; Foukas PG; Giannakou N; Pouliakis A; Dervenis C; Panayiotides IG; Karakitsos P
Pancreas; 2015 Jan; 44(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 25058886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic significance of microvessel density determined by an anti-CD105/endoglin monoclonal antibody in astrocytic tumors: comparison with an anti-CD31 monoclonal antibody.
Yao Y; Kubota T; Takeuchi H; Sato K
Neuropathology; 2005 Sep; 25(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 16193836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Expression of CEACAM1 and CD105 in Renal Cell Carcinoma and Its Correlation with Microvessel Density.
Kang ZP; Wang LX; Liu J; Ouyang H; Xie S; Tan Y
Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr; 2021; 31(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 33639050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Density of microvessels positive for CD105 (endoglin) is related to prognosis in meningiomas.
Barresi V; Cerasoli S; Vitarelli E; Tuccari G
Acta Neuropathol; 2007 Aug; 114(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 17594108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative evaluation of microvessel density determined by CD34 or CD105 in benign and malignant gastric lesions.
Ding S; Li C; Lin S; Yang Y; Liu D; Han Y; Zhang Y; Li L; Zhou L; Kumar S
Hum Pathol; 2006 Jul; 37(7):861-6. PubMed ID: 16784986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic relevance of CD105-assessed microvessel density in laryngeal carcinoma.
Zvrko E; Mikic A; Vuckovic L; Djukic V; Knezevic M
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Oct; 141(4):478-83. PubMed ID: 19786216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inverse correlation of microvessel density with metastasis and prognosis in renal cell carcinoma.
Imao T; Egawa M; Takashima H; Koshida K; Namiki M
Int J Urol; 2004 Nov; 11(11):948-53. PubMed ID: 15509196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The associations between serum VEGF, bFGF and endoglin levels with microvessel density and expression of proangiogenic factors in malignant and benign ovarian tumors.
Szubert S; Moszynski R; Michalak S; Nowicki M; Sajdak S; Szpurek D
Microvasc Res; 2016 Sep; 107():91-6. PubMed ID: 27312585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relation of microvessel density with microvascular invasion, metastasis and prognosis in renal cell carcinoma.
Yildiz E; Ayan S; Goze F; Gokce G; Gultekin EY
BJU Int; 2008 Mar; 101(6):758-64. PubMed ID: 18070177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. CD105 as a tool for assessing microvessel density in renal cell carcinoma.
Cioca A; Muntean D; Bungardean C
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2019; 62(2):239-243. PubMed ID: 30971547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation between selected angiogenic markers and prognosis in pediatric adrenocortical tumors: Angiogenic markers and prognosis in pediatric ACTs.
Dias AI; Fachin CG; Avó LR; Frazão CV; Caran EM; Schettini ST; Alves MT; Ribeiro RC; Abib Sde C
J Pediatr Surg; 2015 Aug; 50(8):1323-8. PubMed ID: 25783314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Significance of CD 105 expression for tumour angiogenesis and prognosis in endometrial carcinomas.
Salvesen HB; Gulluoglu MG; Stefansson I; Akslen LA
APMIS; 2003 Nov; 111(11):1011-8. PubMed ID: 14629267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Angiogenesis in renal cell carcinoma: correlation of microvessel density and microvessel area with other prognostic factors.
Sharma SG; Aggarwal N; Gupta SD; Singh MK; Gupta R; Dinda AK
Int Urol Nephrol; 2011 Mar; 43(1):125-9. PubMed ID: 20535637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
