226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25337227)
21. A higher CD105-assessed microvessel density and worse prognosis in elderly patients with laryngeal carcinoma.
Marioni G; Staffieri A; Manzato E; Ralli G; Lionello M; Giacomelli L; Prosenikliev V; Marchese-Ragona R; Busnardo A; Bolzetta F; Blandamura S
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Feb; 137(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 21339405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Endoglin (CD105) expression in angiogenesis of primary hepatocellular carcinomas: analysis using tissue microarrays and comparisons with CD34 and VEGF.
Yao Y; Pan Y; Chen J; Sun X; Qiu Y; Ding Y
Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2007; 37(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 17311868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Angiogenesis in superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: assessment of microvessel density based on immunostaining for CD34 and CD105.
Kumagai Y; Sobajima J; Higashi M; Ishiguro T; Fukuchi M; Ishibashi K; Baba H; Mochiki E; Yakabi K; Kawano T; Tamaru J; Ishida H
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2014 Jun; 44(6):526-33. PubMed ID: 24748644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prognostic relevance of CD105+ microvessel density in HNSCC patient outcome.
Martone T; Rosso P; Albera R; Migliaretti G; Fraire F; Pignataro L; Pruneri G; Bellone G; Cortesina G
Oral Oncol; 2005 Feb; 41(2):147-55. PubMed ID: 15695116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Expression of a novel endothelial marker, C-type lectin 14A, in epithelial ovarian cancer and its prognostic significance.
Krishna Priya S; Kumar K; Hiran KR; Bindhu MR; Nagare RP; Vijaykumar DK; Ganesan TS
Int J Clin Oncol; 2017 Feb; 22(1):107-117. PubMed ID: 27567920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Endoglin (CD105) positive microvessel density and its relationship with lymph node metastasis in squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue.
Eshghyar N; Mohammadi N; Rahrotaban S; Motahhary P; Vahedi Vaez SM
Arch Iran Med; 2011 Jul; 14(4):276-80. PubMed ID: 21726105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Correlation of microvascular density and clinicopathological factors in different subtypes of renal cell carcinoma].
Zhang YH; Yang Q; Cui W; Liu YX; Liu SX; Yao X
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2010 Feb; 32(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 20403242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. CD105 is a more appropriate marker for evaluating angiogenesis in urothelial cancer of the upper urinary tract than CD31 or CD34.
Miyata Y; Sagara Y; Watanabe S; Asai A; Matsuo T; Ohba K; Hayashi T; Sakai H
Virchows Arch; 2013 Nov; 463(5):673-9. PubMed ID: 23975255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Microvessel density and VEGF expression are prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. Meta-analysis of the literature.
Des Guetz G; Uzzan B; Nicolas P; Cucherat M; Morere JF; Benamouzig R; Breau JL; Perret GY
Br J Cancer; 2006 Jun; 94(12):1823-32. PubMed ID: 16773076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Clinical significance of cell proliferation, microvessel density, and CD44 adhesion molecule expression in renal cell carcinoma.
Rioux-Leclercq N; Epstein JI; Bansard JY; Turlin B; Patard JJ; Manunta A; Chan T; Ramee MP; Lobel B; Moulinoux JP
Hum Pathol; 2001 Nov; 32(11):1209-15. PubMed ID: 11727260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Clinical significances and prognostic value of cancer stem-like cells markers and vasculogenic mimicry in renal cell carcinoma.
Zhang Y; Sun B; Zhao X; Liu Z; Wang X; Yao X; Dong X; Chi J
J Surg Oncol; 2013 Nov; 108(6):414-9. PubMed ID: 23996537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparative analysis of COX-2, vascular endothelial growth factor and microvessel density in human renal cell carcinomas.
Hemmerlein B; Galuschka L; Putzer N; Zischkau S; Heuser M
Histopathology; 2004 Dec; 45(6):603-11. PubMed ID: 15569051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Correlation between CD105 expression and postoperative recurrence and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Yang LY; Lu WQ; Huang GW; Wang W
BMC Cancer; 2006 May; 6():110. PubMed ID: 16650286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Increased expression of Chitinase 3-like 1 and microvessel density predicts metastasis and poor prognosis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Zhang JP; Yuan HX; Kong WT; Liu Y; Lin ZM; Wangs WP; Guo JM
Tumour Biol; 2014 Dec; 35(12):12131-7. PubMed ID: 25142236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Angiogenesis in renal cell carcinoma: the role of tumor-associated macrophages.
Toge H; Inagaki T; Kojimoto Y; Shinka T; Hara I
Int J Urol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):801-7. PubMed ID: 19811548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Microvessel density in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Szafarowski T; Sierdzinski J; Szczepanski MJ; Whiteside TL; Ludwig N; Krzeski A
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Jul; 275(7):1845-1851. PubMed ID: 29748768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Pericyte coverage of differentiated vessels inside tumor vasculature is an independent unfavorable prognostic factor for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Cao Y; Zhang ZL; Zhou M; Elson P; Rini B; Aydin H; Feenstra K; Tan MH; Berghuis B; Tabbey R; Resau JH; Zhou FJ; Teh BT; Qian CN
Cancer; 2013 Jan; 119(2):313-24. PubMed ID: 22811049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Evaluation of microvessel density (MVD) in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma].
Bodnar M; Szylberg Ł; Kaźmierczak W; Marszałek A
Przegl Lek; 2012; 69(10):726-30. PubMed ID: 23421020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Tumor Microvessel Density as a Prognostic Marker in High-Risk Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated on ECOG-ACRIN E2805.
Jilaveanu LB; Puligandla M; Weiss SA; Wang XV; Zito C; Flaherty KT; Boeke M; Neumeister V; Camp RL; Adeniran A; Pins M; Manola J; DiPaola RS; Haas NB; Kluger HM
Clin Cancer Res; 2018 Jan; 24(1):217-223. PubMed ID: 29066509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Prognostic value of blood and lymphatic vessel markers in tongue cancer: A systematic review.
Almahmoudi R; Kasanen M; Sieviläinen M; Salem A; Pirinen M; Salo T; Al-Samadi A
Cancer Sci; 2019 Nov; 110(11):3424-3433. PubMed ID: 31495050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
