These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25337603)

  • 1. Some notes on critical appraisal of prevalence studies: Comment on: "The development of a critical appraisal tool for use in systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence".
    Harder T
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2014 Oct; 3(5):289-90. PubMed ID: 25337603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The development of a critical appraisal tool for use in systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence.
    Munn Z; Moola S; Riitano D; Lisy K
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2014 Aug; 3(3):123-8. PubMed ID: 25197676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of tools for assessing the methodological quality of primary and secondary studies in health technology assessment reports in Germany.
    Dreier M; Borutta B; Stahmeyer J; Krauth C; Walter U
    GMS Health Technol Assess; 2010 Jun; 6():Doc07. PubMed ID: 21289880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Critical appraisal in ecology: What tools are available, and what is being used in systematic reviews?
    Stanhope J; Weinstein P
    Res Synth Methods; 2023 May; 14(3):342-356. PubMed ID: 36303454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Evidence Project risk of bias tool: assessing study rigor for both randomized and non-randomized intervention studies.
    Kennedy CE; Fonner VA; Armstrong KA; Denison JA; Yeh PT; O'Reilly KR; Sweat MD
    Syst Rev; 2019 Jan; 8(1):3. PubMed ID: 30606262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Methodological quality of case series studies: an introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool.
    Munn Z; Barker TH; Moola S; Tufanaru C; Stern C; McArthur A; Stephenson M; Aromataris E
    JBI Evid Synth; 2020 Oct; 18(10):2127-2133. PubMed ID: 33038125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quality assessment with diverse studies (QuADS): an appraisal tool for methodological and reporting quality in systematic reviews of mixed- or multi-method studies.
    Harrison R; Jones B; Gardner P; Lawton R
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Feb; 21(1):144. PubMed ID: 33588842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.
    Zeng X; Zhang Y; Kwong JS; Zhang C; Li S; Sun F; Niu Y; Du L
    J Evid Based Med; 2015 Feb; 8(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 25594108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development and validation of a quality appraisal tool for validity studies (QAVALS).
    Gore S; Goldberg A; Huang MH; Shoemaker M; Blackwood J
    Physiother Theory Pract; 2021 May; 37(5):646-654. PubMed ID: 31246154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.
    Allen D; Gillen E; Rixson L
    JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2009; 7(3):80-129. PubMed ID: 27820426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.
    Walters SJ; Stern C; Robertson-Malt S
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Apr; 14(4):138-97. PubMed ID: 27532315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Critical appraisal in rapid systematic reviews of COVID-19 studies: implementation of the Quality Criteria Checklist (QCC).
    Duval D; Pearce-Smith N; Palmer JC; Sarfo-Annin JK; Rudd P; Clark R
    Syst Rev; 2023 Mar; 12(1):55. PubMed ID: 36973811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of choice of quality appraisal tool for systematic reviews in overviews.
    Pieper D; Mathes T; Eikermann M
    J Evid Based Med; 2014 May; 7(2):72-8. PubMed ID: 25155764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of a quality assessment tool for systematic reviews of observational studies (QATSO) of HIV prevalence in men having sex with men and associated risk behaviours.
    Wong WC; Cheung CS; Hart GJ
    Emerg Themes Epidemiol; 2008 Nov; 5():23. PubMed ID: 19014686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence-Based Decision-Making 1: Critical Appraisal.
    Twells LK
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2249():389-404. PubMed ID: 33871855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
    Manchikanti L
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools.
    Katrak P; Bialocerkowski AE; Massy-Westropp N; Kumar S; Grimmer KA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2004 Sep; 4():22. PubMed ID: 15369598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2008; 6(15):583-632. PubMed ID: 27819972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.