140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25337636)
1. Spelling-to-sound correspondences affect acronym recognition processes.
Playfoot D; Izura C
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(5):1026-39. PubMed ID: 25337636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Imageability, age of acquisition, and frequency factors in acronym comprehension.
Playfoot D; Izura C
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013 Jun; 66(6):1131-45. PubMed ID: 23153389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Imageability and age of acquisition effects in disyllabic word recognition.
Cortese MJ; Schock J
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(5):946-72. PubMed ID: 23030642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A normative study of acronyms and acronym naming.
Izura C; Playfoot D
Behav Res Methods; 2012 Sep; 44(3):862-89. PubMed ID: 22180103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Are acronyms really irregular? Preserved acronym reading in a case of semantic dementia.
Playfoot D; Izura C; Tree J
Neuropsychologia; 2013 Aug; 51(9):1673-83. PubMed ID: 23727471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The time-course of lexical activation in Japanese morphographic word recognition: evidence for a character-driven processing model.
Miwa K; Libben G; Dijkstra T; Baayen H
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(1):79-113. PubMed ID: 23713954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does frequency trajectory influence word identification? A cross-task comparison.
Lété B; Bonin P
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(5):973-1000. PubMed ID: 23030693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Effects of the lexical-semantic variables in visual word recognition].
Alija M; Cuetos F
Psicothema; 2006 Aug; 18(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 17296076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The speed of orthographic processing during lexical decision: electrophysiological evidence for independent coding of letter identity and letter position in visual word recognition.
Mariol M; Jacques C; Schelstraete MA; Rossion B
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1283-99. PubMed ID: 18284349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of lexical variables in the visual recognition of Chinese characters: A megastudy analysis.
Sze WP; Yap MJ; Rickard Liow SJ
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(8):1541-70. PubMed ID: 25622522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A mega recognition memory study of 2897 disyllabic words.
Cortese MJ; McCarty DP; Schock J
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(8):1489-501. PubMed ID: 25220011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies.
Kuperman V; Drieghe D; Keuleers E; Brysbaert M
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(3):563-80. PubMed ID: 22524868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Speed of lexical and nonlexical processing in French: the case of the regularity effect.
Ziegler JC; Perry C; Coltheart M
Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Dec; 10(4):947-53. PubMed ID: 15000543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The relationship between knowing a word and reading it aloud in children's word reading development.
Nation K; Cocksey J
J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Jul; 103(3):296-308. PubMed ID: 19410262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Imageability estimates for 3,000 disyllabic words.
Schock J; Cortese MJ; Khanna MM
Behav Res Methods; 2012 Jun; 44(2):374-9. PubMed ID: 22037976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A further examination of word frequency and age-of-acquisition effects in English lexical decision task performance: The role of frequency trajectory.
Juhasz BJ; Yap MJ; Raoul A; Kaye M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):82-96. PubMed ID: 29683706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of word prevalence on lexical decision times: Evidence from the Dutch Lexicon Project 2.
Brysbaert M; Stevens M; Mandera P; Keuleers E
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Mar; 42(3):441-58. PubMed ID: 26501839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A database of 629 English compound words: ratings of familiarity, lexeme meaning dominance, semantic transparency, age of acquisition, imageability, and sensory experience.
Juhasz BJ; Lai YH; Woodcock ML
Behav Res Methods; 2015 Dec; 47(4):1004-1019. PubMed ID: 25361864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contextual diversity is a main determinant of word identification times in young readers.
Perea M; Soares AP; Comesaña M
J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Sep; 116(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 23374607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Word recognition in Alzheimer's disease: Effects of semantic degeneration.
Cuetos F; Arce N; Martínez C; Ellis AW
J Neuropsychol; 2017 Mar; 11(1):26-39. PubMed ID: 26114914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
