These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25337942)

  • 1. Effects of non-differential exposure misclassification on false conclusions in hypothesis-generating studies.
    Burstyn I; Yang Y; Schnatter AR
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2014 Oct; 11(10):10951-66. PubMed ID: 25337942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Curious phenomena in Bayesian adjustment for exposure misclassification.
    Gustafson P; Greenland S
    Stat Med; 2006 Jan; 25(1):87-103. PubMed ID: 16220473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inappropriate use of statistical power.
    Fraser RA
    Bone Marrow Transplant; 2023 May; 58(5):474-477. PubMed ID: 36869191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is probabilistic bias analysis approximately Bayesian?
    MacLehose RF; Gustafson P
    Epidemiology; 2012 Jan; 23(1):151-8. PubMed ID: 22157311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Bayesian approach to strengthen inference for case-control studies with multiple error-prone exposure assessments.
    Zhang J; Cole SR; Richardson DB; Chu H
    Stat Med; 2013 Nov; 32(25):4426-37. PubMed ID: 23661263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Subgroup analyses in randomised controlled trials: quantifying the risks of false-positives and false-negatives.
    Brookes ST; Whitley E; Peters TJ; Mulheran PA; Egger M; Davey Smith G
    Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(33):1-56. PubMed ID: 11701102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adjusting for differential misclassification in matched case-control studies utilizing health administrative data.
    Högg T; Zhao Y; Gustafson P; Petkau J; Fisk J; Marrie RA; Tremlett H
    Stat Med; 2019 Aug; 38(19):3669-3681. PubMed ID: 31115088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Bayesian approach to prospective binary outcome studies with misclassification in a binary risk factor.
    Prescott GJ; Garthwaite PH
    Stat Med; 2005 Nov; 24(22):3463-77. PubMed ID: 16237661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bayesian adjustment for exposure misclassification in case-control studies.
    Chu R; Gustafson P; Le N
    Stat Med; 2010 Apr; 29(9):994-1003. PubMed ID: 20087839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using biological data from field studies with multiple reference sites as a basis for environmental management: the risks for false positives and false negatives.
    Hanson N
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Mar; 92(3):610-9. PubMed ID: 21035245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Bayesian decision procedure for testing multiple hypotheses in DNA microarray experiments.
    Gómez-Villegas MA; Salazar I; Sanz L
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2014 Feb; 13(1):49-65. PubMed ID: 24317791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Partial identification arising from nondifferential exposure misclassification: how informative are data on the unlikely, maybe, and likely exposed?
    Wang D; Shen T; Gustafson P
    Int J Biostat; 2012 Nov; 8(1):31. PubMed ID: 23152432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robust bayesian sensitivity analysis for case-control studies with uncertain exposure misclassification probabilities.
    Mak TS; Best N; Rushton L
    Int J Biostat; 2015 May; 11(1):135-49. PubMed ID: 25720128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Part 2. Development of Enhanced Statistical Methods for Assessing Health Effects Associated with an Unknown Number of Major Sources of Multiple Air Pollutants.
    Park ES; Symanski E; Han D; Spiegelman C
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2015 Jun; (183 Pt 1-2):51-113. PubMed ID: 26333239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A method to increase the power of multiple testing procedures through sample splitting.
    Rubin D; Dudoit S; van der Laan M
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article19. PubMed ID: 17049030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bayesian methods for correcting misclassification: an example from birth defects epidemiology.
    MacLehose RF; Olshan AF; Herring AH; Honein MA; Shaw GM; Romitti PA;
    Epidemiology; 2009 Jan; 20(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 19234399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of sensitivity-specificity imputation, direct imputation and fully Bayesian analysis to adjust for exposure misclassification when validation data are unavailable.
    Corbin M; Haslett S; Pearce N; Maule M; Greenland S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 46(3):1063-1072. PubMed ID: 28338966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A tutorial on testing hypotheses using the Bayes factor.
    Hoijtink H; Mulder J; van Lissa C; Gu X
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Oct; 24(5):539-556. PubMed ID: 30742472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patterns of bias due to differential misclassification by case-control status in a case-control study.
    Chyou PH
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2007; 22(1):7-17. PubMed ID: 17225958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Empirical Bayes estimation of posterior probabilities of enrichment: a comparative study of five estimators of the local false discovery rate.
    Yang Z; Li Z; Bickel DR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Mar; 14():87. PubMed ID: 23497228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.