These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25338170)

  • 1. Do I have my attention? Speed of processing advantages for the self-face are not driven by automatic attention capture.
    Keyes H; Dlugokencka A
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e110792. PubMed ID: 25338170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Self-face recognition is characterized by "bilateral gain" and by faster, more accurate performance which persists when faces are inverted.
    Keyes H; Brady N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 May; 63(5):840-7. PubMed ID: 20198537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Categorical perception effects for facial identity in robustly represented familiar and self-faces: the role of configural and featural information.
    Keyes H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(4):760-72. PubMed ID: 22248095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Priming with threatening faces modulates the self-face advantage by enhancing the other-face processing rather than suppressing the self-face processing.
    Guan L; Qi M; Li H; Hitchman G; Yang J; Liu Y
    Brain Res; 2015 May; 1608():97-107. PubMed ID: 25765156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attention to self-referential stimuli: can I ignore my own face?
    Devue C; Brédart S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Jun; 128(2):290-7. PubMed ID: 18413272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is the self always better than a friend? Self-face recognition in Christians and atheists.
    Ma Y; Han S
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e37824. PubMed ID: 22662231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [No difference found between cognitive processing of self-face (self-name) and other's face (other's name) using a priming task].
    Shiota M; Horiuchi T
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2008 Dec; 79(5):432-8. PubMed ID: 19172912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Self-prioritization of fully unfamiliar stimuli.
    Woźniak M; Knoblich G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Aug; 72(8):2110-2120. PubMed ID: 30727822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Putting a name to a face: the role of name labels in the formation of face memories.
    Gordon I; Tanaka JW
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Nov; 23(11):3280-93. PubMed ID: 21557646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Do pictures of faces, and which ones, capture attention in the inattentional-blindness paradigm?
    Devue C; Laloyaux C; Feyers D; Theeuwes J; Brédart S
    Perception; 2009; 38(4):552-68. PubMed ID: 19522323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differences in own-face but not own-name discrimination between autistic and neurotypical adults: A fast periodic visual stimulation-EEG study.
    Nijhof AD; Catmur C; Brewer R; Coll MP; Wiersema JR; Bird G
    Cortex; 2024 Feb; 171():308-318. PubMed ID: 38070386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attentional capture by completely task-irrelevant faces.
    Sato S; Kawahara JI
    Psychol Res; 2015 Jul; 79(4):523-33. PubMed ID: 25030814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What's in the name? Categorical perception for unfamiliar faces can occur through labeling.
    Kikutani M; Roberson D; Hanley JR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Aug; 15(4):787-94. PubMed ID: 18792505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The self-face captures attention without consciousness: Evidence from the N2pc ERP component analysis.
    Bola M; Paź M; Doradzińska Ł; Nowicka A
    Psychophysiology; 2021 Apr; 58(4):e13759. PubMed ID: 33355938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ERP responses differentiate inverted but not upright face processing in adults with ASD.
    Webb SJ; Merkle K; Murias M; Richards T; Aylward E; Dawson G
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2012 Jun; 7(5):578-87. PubMed ID: 19454620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Task-irrelevant angry faces capture attention in visual search while modulated by resources.
    Huang SL; Chang YC; Chen YJ
    Emotion; 2011 Jun; 11(3):544-52. PubMed ID: 21517157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relationship between visual search and categorization of own- and other-age faces.
    Craig BM; Lipp OV
    Br J Psychol; 2018 Nov; 109(4):736-757. PubMed ID: 29536506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neural correlates of own name and own face detection in autism spectrum disorder.
    Cygan HB; Tacikowski P; Ostaszewski P; Chojnicka I; Nowicka A
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e86020. PubMed ID: 24465847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attentional capture by spatiotemporally task-irrelevant faces: supportive evidence for Sato and Kawahara (2015).
    Ariga A; Arihara K
    Psychol Res; 2018 Sep; 82(5):859-865. PubMed ID: 28455652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The generality of the attentional boost effect for famous, unfamiliar, and inverted faces.
    Oliver GW; Lee VG
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Feb; 31(1):234-241. PubMed ID: 37537318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.