These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25339410)

  • 1. The impact of fellowship training on pathological outcomes following radical prostatectomy: a population based analysis.
    Nayak JG; Drachenberg DE; Mau E; Suderman D; Bucher O; Lambert P; Quon H
    BMC Urol; 2014 Oct; 14():82. PubMed ID: 25339410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. UK radical prostatectomy outcomes and surgeon case volume: based on an analysis of the British Association of Urological Surgeons Complex Operations Database.
    Vesey SG; McCabe JE; Hounsome L; Fowler S
    BJU Int; 2012 Feb; 109(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 21771246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of surgical margin status on prostate-cancer-specific mortality.
    Chalfin HJ; Dinizo M; Trock BJ; Feng Z; Partin AW; Walsh PC; Humphreys E; Han M
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1684-9. PubMed ID: 22788795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Re: The Impact of fellowship training on pathological outcomes following radical prostatectomy: a population based analysis.
    Taneja SS
    J Urol; 2015 May; 193(5):1539-40. PubMed ID: 25895762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Positive surgical margins during robotic radical prostatectomy: a contemporary analysis of risk factors.
    Liss M; Osann K; Ornstein D
    BJU Int; 2008 Aug; 102(5):603-8. PubMed ID: 18435807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Supervisor volume affects oncological outcomes of trainees performing open radical prostatectomy.
    O'Kane D; Papa N; Lawrentschuk N; Syme R; Giles G; Bolton D
    ANZ J Surg; 2016 Apr; 86(4):249-54. PubMed ID: 25916513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fellowship training as a modifier of the surgical learning curve.
    Bianco FJ; Cronin AM; Klein EA; Pontes JE; Scardino PT; Vickers AJ
    Acad Med; 2010 May; 85(5):863-8. PubMed ID: 20520043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of fellowship training on pathologic outcomes and complication rates of radical prostatectomy.
    Rosser CJ; Kamat AM; Pendleton J; Robinson TL; Pisters LL; Swanson DA; Babaian RJ
    Cancer; 2006 Jul; 107(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 16708356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of pathologist experience on positive surgical margins following radical prostatectomy.
    Tallman JE; Packiam VT; Wroblewski KE; Paner GP; Eggener SE
    Urol Oncol; 2017 Jul; 35(7):461.e1-461.e6. PubMed ID: 28302349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
    Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
    BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Primary Gleason grade 4 at the positive margin is associated with metastasis and death among patients with Gleason 7 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
    Viers BR; Sukov WR; Gettman MT; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Frank I; Tollefson MK; Thompson RH; Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ
    Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1116-24. PubMed ID: 25052213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictors of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy at a single institution: preoperative and pathologic factors, and the impact of surgeon variability and technique on incidence and location.
    Lallas CD; Fashola Y; Den RB; Gelpi-Hammerschmidt F; Calvaresi AE; McCue P; Birbe R; Gomella LG; Trabulsi EJ
    Can J Urol; 2014 Oct; 21(5):7479-86. PubMed ID: 25347375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Association of Urologic Oncology Fellowship Training and Diagnostic Yield of Prostate Biopsy.
    DeWitt-Foy ME; Klein EA; ElShafei A; Coronado WM; Campbell S; Gong M; Berglund R; Ulchaker J; Fareed K; Abouassaly R
    Urology; 2020 Mar; 137():115-120. PubMed ID: 31785277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Australian laparoscopic non robotic radical prostatectomy experience - analysis of 2943 cases (USANZ supplement).
    Louie-Johnsun MW; Handmer MM; Calopedos RJ; Chabert C; Cohen RJ; Gianduzzo TR; Kearns PA; Moon DA; Ooi J; Shannon T; Sofield D; Tan AH
    BJU Int; 2016 Oct; 118 Suppl 3():43-48. PubMed ID: 27659257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
    J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of robot-assisted and open retropubic radical prostatectomy for risk of biochemical progression in men with positive surgical margins.
    Shapiro EY; Scarberry K; Patel T; Bergman A; Ahn JJ; Sahi N; RoyChoudhury A; Deutch I; McKiernan JM; Benson MC; Badani KK
    J Endourol; 2014 Feb; 28(2):208-13. PubMed ID: 24044423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Impact of the learning curve on positive surgical margins.
    Erdogru T; Celik O; Akand M; Akin Y; Sahin AF; Ciftcioglu MA
    Arch Esp Urol; 2013 May; 66(4):359-66. PubMed ID: 23676539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on biochemical recurrence in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
    Preisser F; Coxilha G; Heinze A; Oh S; Chun FK; Sauter G; Pompe RS; Huland H; Graefen M; Tilki D
    Prostate; 2019 Dec; 79(16):1832-1836. PubMed ID: 31553506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preoperative characteristics of high-Gleason disease predictive of favourable pathological and clinical outcomes at radical prostatectomy.
    Pierorazio PM; Ross AE; Lin BM; Epstein JI; Han M; Walsh PC; Partin AW; Pavlovich CP; Schaeffer EM
    BJU Int; 2012 Oct; 110(8):1122-8. PubMed ID: 22373045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.