These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25339515)

  • 1. Establishment of a germ carrier assay to assess disinfectant efficacy against oocysts of coccidian parasites.
    Dresely I; Daugschies A; Lendner M
    Parasitol Res; 2015 Jan; 114(1):273-81. PubMed ID: 25339515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combination of cell culture and quantitative PCR (cc-qPCR) to assess disinfectants efficacy on Cryptosporidium oocysts under standardized conditions.
    Shahiduzzaman M; Dyachenko V; Keidel J; Schmäschke R; Daugschies A
    Vet Parasitol; 2010 Jan; 167(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 19850414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improvement of in vitro evaluation of chemical disinfectants for efficacy on Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts.
    Delling C; Lendner M; Müller U; Daugschies A
    Vet Parasitol; 2017 Oct; 245():5-13. PubMed ID: 28969838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficacy of two peroxygen-based disinfectants for inactivation of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts.
    Quilez J; Sanchez-Acedo C; Avendaño C; del Cacho E; Lopez-Bernad F
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2005 May; 71(5):2479-83. PubMed ID: 15870337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy of amine-based disinfectant KENO™COX on the infectivity of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts.
    Naciri M; Mancassola R; Fort G; Danneels B; Verhaeghe J
    Vet Parasitol; 2011 Jun; 179(1-3):43-9. PubMed ID: 21354705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of viability assays for Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts after disinfection.
    Joachim A; Eckert E; Petry F; Bialek R; Daugschies A
    Vet Parasitol; 2003 Jan; 111(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 12523978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inactivation of Cryptosporidium parvum under laboratory conditions.
    Delling C; Holzhausen I; Daugschies A; Lendner M
    Parasitol Res; 2016 Feb; 115(2):863-6. PubMed ID: 26566617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy of glutaraldehyde disinfectant against Cryptosporidium parvum in the presence of various organic soils.
    Wilson J; Margolin AB
    J AOAC Int; 2003; 86(1):96-100. PubMed ID: 12607746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A non-biological surrogate for sequential disinfection processes.
    Baeza C; Ducoste J
    Water Res; 2004; 38(14-15):3400-10. PubMed ID: 15276757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An immunomagnetic separation-reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (IMS-RT-PCR) test for sensitive and rapid detection of viable waterborne Cryptosporidium parvum.
    Hallier-Soulier S; Guillot E
    Environ Microbiol; 2003 Jul; 5(7):592-8. PubMed ID: 12823191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cell Culture Infectivity to Assess Chlorine Disinfection of Cryptosporidium Oocysts in Water.
    Murphy JL; Arrowood MJ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2052():283-302. PubMed ID: 31452168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Effect of the mixed-oxidant solution on infectivity of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in a neonatal mouse model].
    Sasahara T; Aoki M; Sekiguchi T; Takahashi A; Satoh Y; Kitasato H; Inoue M
    Kansenshogaku Zasshi; 2003 Feb; 77(2):75-82. PubMed ID: 12661082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The efficacy of three common hospital liquid germicides to inactivate Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts.
    Wilson JA; Margolin AB
    J Hosp Infect; 1999 Jul; 42(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 10439996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) for Eimeria tenella replication--Implications for experimental refinement and animal welfare.
    Nolan MJ; Tomley FM; Kaiser P; Blake DP
    Parasitol Int; 2015 Oct; 64(5):464-70. PubMed ID: 26141544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of two commercial disinfectants on the viability and infectivity of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts.
    Castro-Hermida JA; Pors I; Méndez-Hermida F; Ares-Mazás E; Chartier C
    Vet J; 2006 Mar; 171(2):340-5. PubMed ID: 16490718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro evaluation of the disinfection efficacy on Eimeria tenella unsporulated oocysts isolated from broilers.
    Guimarães JS; Bogado AL; da Cunha TC; Garcia JL
    Rev Bras Parasitol Vet; 2007; 16(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 17706006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inactivation of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts and Clostridium perfringens spores by a mixed-oxidant disinfectant and by free chlorine.
    Venczel LV; Arrowood M; Hurd M; Sobsey MD
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 1997 Apr; 63(4):1598-601. PubMed ID: 9097455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of a Ct equation taking into consideration the effect of lot variability on the inactivation of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts with ozone.
    Sivaganesan M; Mariñas BJ
    Water Res; 2005 Jun; 39(11):2429-37. PubMed ID: 15963550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development and application of a standardized assay for chemical disinfection of coccidia oocysts.
    Daugschies A; Böse R; Marx J; Teich K; Friedhoff KT
    Vet Parasitol; 2002 Feb; 103(4):299-308. PubMed ID: 11777608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of molecular markers for determining the viability and infectivity of Cryptosporidium oocysts and validation of molecular methods against animal infectivity assay.
    Alum A; Rubino JR; Khalid Ijaz M
    Int J Infect Dis; 2011 Mar; 15(3):e197-200. PubMed ID: 21185212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.