127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25339841)
1. AIMS65: a promising upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk score but further validation required.
Boyapati R; Majumdar A; Robertson M
World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Oct; 20(39):14515-6. PubMed ID: 25339841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is the AIMS65 score useful in predicting outcomes in peptic ulcer bleeding?
Jung SH; Oh JH; Lee HY; Jeong JW; Go SE; You CR; Jeon EJ; Choi SW
World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Feb; 20(7):1846-51. PubMed ID: 24587662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validity of the Pre-endoscopic Scoring Systems for the Prediction of the Failure of Endoscopic Hemostasis in Bleeding Gastroduodenal Peptic Ulcers.
Iino C; Shimoyama T; Igarashi T; Aihara T; Ishii K; Sakamoto J; Tono H; Fukuda S
Intern Med; 2018 May; 57(10):1355-1360. PubMed ID: 29321420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Scoring systems for predicting clinical outcomes in peptic ulcer bleeding.
Noh JH; Cha B; Ahn JY; Na HK; Lee JH; Jung KW; Kim DH; Choi KD; Song HJ; Lee GH; Jung HY
Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Sep; 101(36):e30410. PubMed ID: 36086775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Red Blood Cell Transfusion Volumes According to AIMS65 Scores in Patients with Peptic Ulcer Bleeding.
Lee MW; Lee HJ; Shin KH; Kim GH; Kim HH
Lab Med; 2022 Mar; 53(2):190-193. PubMed ID: 34522953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A multicenter prospective study of the treatment and outcome of patients with gastroduodenal peptic ulcer bleeding in Japan.
Kawaguchi K; Yoshida A; Yuki T; Shibagaki K; Tanaka H; Fujishiro H; Miyaoka Y; Yanagitani A; Koda M; Ikuta Y; Hamamoto T; Mukoyama T; Sasaki Y; Kushiyama Y; Yuki M; Noguchi N; Miura M; Ikebuchi Y; Yashima K; Kinoshita Y; Ishihara S; Isomoto H
Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Dec; 101(49):e32281. PubMed ID: 36626498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Emergency endoscopy for acute gastrointestinal bleeding: prognostic value of endoscopic hemostasis and the AIMS65 score in Japanese patients.
Nakamura S; Matsumoto T; Sugimori H; Esaki M; Kitazono T; Hashizume M
Dig Endosc; 2014 May; 26(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 24168099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
Yaka E; Yılmaz S; Doğan NÖ; Pekdemir M
Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jan; 22(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 25556538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems.
Robertson M; Majumdar A; Boyapati R; Chung W; Worland T; Terbah R; Wei J; Lontos S; Angus P; Vaughan R
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun; 83(6):1151-60. PubMed ID: 26515955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treatment and prognosis in peptic ulcer bleeding.
Laursen SB
Dan Med J; 2014 Jan; 61(1):B4797. PubMed ID: 24547604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparison between Glascow-Blatchford, Rockall and AIMS65 scores in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a hospital in Lima, Peru].
Espinoza-Ríos J; Aguilar Sánchez V; Bravo Paredes EA; Pinto Valdivia J; Huerta-Mercado Tenorio J
Rev Gastroenterol Peru; 2016; 36(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 27409091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endoscopic findings and management of dengue patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Chiu YC; Wu KL; Kuo CH; Hu TH; Chou YP; Chuah SK; Kuo CM; Kee KM; Changchien CS; Liu JW; Chiu KW
Am J Trop Med Hyg; 2005 Aug; 73(2):441-4. PubMed ID: 16103618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of AIMS65 Score and Other Scoring Systems for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Koreans with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
Park SM; Yeum SC; Kim BW; Kim JS; Kim JH; Sim EH; Ji JS; Choi H
Gut Liver; 2016 Jul; 10(4):526-31. PubMed ID: 27377742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [AIMS65 score validation for upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the National Hospital Cayetano Heredia].
Aguilar Sánchez V; Bravo Paredes EA; Pinto Valdivia JL; Valenzuela Granados V; Espinoza-Rios JL
Rev Gastroenterol Peru; 2015; 35(4):323-8. PubMed ID: 26802886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Glasgow Blatchford, pre-endoscopic Rockall and AIMS65 scores show no difference in predicting rebleeding rate and mortality in variceal bleeding.
Budimir I; Gradišer M; Nikolić M; Baršić N; Ljubičić N; Kralj D; Budimir I
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Nov; 51(11):1375-9. PubMed ID: 27356670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The use of a Doppler ultrasound probe for localising arterial blood flow during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Beckly DE; Casebow MP; Pettengell KE
Endoscopy; 1982 Jul; 14(4):146-7. PubMed ID: 6980115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The AIMS65 Score Is a Useful Predictor of Mortality in Patients with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Urgent Endoscopy in Patients with High AIMS65 Scores.
Park SW; Song YW; Tak DH; Ahn BM; Kang SH; Moon HS; Sung JK; Jeong HY
Clin Endosc; 2015 Nov; 48(6):522-7. PubMed ID: 26668799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The benefits of endoscopy in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Rutgeerts P; Vantrappen G
Endoscopy; 1986 May; 18 Suppl 2():15-7. PubMed ID: 3519189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study.
Stanley AJ; Laine L; Dalton HR; Ngu JH; Schultz M; Abazi R; Zakko L; Thornton S; Wilkinson K; Khor CJ; Murray IA; Laursen SB;
BMJ; 2017 Jan; 356():i6432. PubMed ID: 28053181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of three scoring systems for risk stratification in elderly patients wıth acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Kalkan Ç; Soykan I; Karakaya F; Tüzün A; Gençtürk ZB
Geriatr Gerontol Int; 2017 Apr; 17(4):575-583. PubMed ID: 27075860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
