These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25341022)

  • 1. A 20 min window is optimal in a non-wear algorithm for tri-axial thigh-worn accelerometry in overweight people.
    Berendsen BA; Hendriks MR; Willems P; Meijer K; Schaper NC; Savelberg HH
    Physiol Meas; 2014 Nov; 35(11):2205-12. PubMed ID: 25341022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and application of an automated algorithm to identify a window of consecutive days of accelerometer wear for large-scale studies.
    Rillamas-Sun E; Buchner DM; Di C; Evenson KR; LaCroix AZ
    BMC Res Notes; 2015 Jun; 8():270. PubMed ID: 26113170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is the pain of activity log-books worth the gain in precision when distinguishing wear and non-wear time for tri-axial accelerometers?
    Peeters G; van Gellecum Y; Ryde G; Farías NA; Brown WJ
    J Sci Med Sport; 2013 Nov; 16(6):515-9. PubMed ID: 23294696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison and validation of accelerometer wear time and non-wear time algorithms for assessing physical activity levels in children and adolescents.
    Vanhelst J; Vidal F; Drumez E; Béghin L; Baudelet JB; Coopman S; Gottrand F
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):72. PubMed ID: 30940079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identifying ActiGraph non-wear time in pregnant women with overweight or obesity.
    Leonard KS; Pauley AM; Hohman EE; Guo P; Rivera DE; Savage JS; Buman MP; Symons Downs D
    J Sci Med Sport; 2020 Dec; 23(12):1197-1201. PubMed ID: 32859522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Field evaluation of a random forest activity classifier for wrist-worn accelerometer data.
    Pavey TG; Gilson ND; Gomersall SR; Clark B; Trost SG
    J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Jan; 20(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 27372275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Classification of accelerometer wear and non-wear events in seconds for monitoring free-living physical activity.
    Zhou SM; Hill RA; Morgan K; Stratton G; Gravenor MB; Bijlsma G; Brophy S
    BMJ Open; 2015 May; 5(5):e007447. PubMed ID: 25968000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of wear/nonwear time classification algorithms for triaxial accelerometer.
    Choi L; Ward SC; Schnelle JF; Buchowski MS
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2012 Oct; 44(10):2009-16. PubMed ID: 22525772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of accelerometer data processing decisions on the sample size, wear time and physical activity level of a large cohort study.
    Keadle SK; Shiroma EJ; Freedson PS; Lee IM
    BMC Public Health; 2014 Nov; 14():1210. PubMed ID: 25421941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating the performance of raw and epoch non-wear algorithms using multiple accelerometers and electrocardiogram recordings.
    Syed S; Morseth B; Hopstock LA; Horsch A
    Sci Rep; 2020 Apr; 10(1):5866. PubMed ID: 32246080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detecting accelerometer non-wear periods using change in acceleration combined with rate-of-change in temperature.
    Vert A; Weber KS; Thai V; Turner E; Beyer KB; Cornish BF; Godkin FE; Wong C; McIlroy WE; Van Ooteghem K
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 May; 22(1):147. PubMed ID: 35596151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identifying accelerometer nonwear and wear time in older adults.
    Hutto B; Howard VJ; Blair SN; Colabianchi N; Vena JE; Rhodes D; Hooker SP
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2013 Oct; 10():120. PubMed ID: 24156309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Potential corner case cautions regarding publicly available implementations of the National Cancer Institute's nonwear/wear classification algorithm for accelerometer data.
    Moore HE; Haydel KF; Banda JA; Fiterau M; Desai M; Robinson TN
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0210006. PubMed ID: 30596771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accelerometer wear-site detection: When one site does not suit all, all of the time.
    Rowlands AV; Olds TS; Bakrania K; Stanley RM; Parfitt G; Eston RG; Yates T; Fraysse F
    J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Apr; 20(4):368-372. PubMed ID: 28117147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validity of a Non-Proprietary Algorithm for Identifying Lying Down Using Raw Data from Thigh-Worn Triaxial Accelerometers.
    Hettiarachchi P; Aili K; Holtermann A; Stamatakis E; Svartengren M; Palm P
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jan; 21(3):. PubMed ID: 33572815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of accelerometer wear and nonwear time classification algorithm.
    Choi L; Liu Z; Matthews CE; Buchowski MS
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2011 Feb; 43(2):357-64. PubMed ID: 20581716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Varying behavior of different window sizes on the classification of static and dynamic physical activities from a single accelerometer.
    Fida B; Bernabucci I; Bibbo D; Conforto S; Schmid M
    Med Eng Phys; 2015 Jul; 37(7):705-11. PubMed ID: 25983067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An investigation into the minimum accelerometry wear time for reliable estimates of habitual physical activity and definition of a standard measurement day in pre-school children.
    Hislop J; Law J; Rush R; Grainger A; Bulley C; Reilly JJ; Mercer T
    Physiol Meas; 2014 Nov; 35(11):2213-28. PubMed ID: 25340328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. 24 h-accelerometry in epidemiological studies: automated detection of non-wear time in comparison to diary information.
    Jaeschke L; Luzak A; Steinbrecher A; Jeran S; Ferland M; Linkohr B; Schulz H; Pischon T
    Sci Rep; 2017 May; 7(1):2227. PubMed ID: 28533553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validity of an automated algorithm to identify waking and in-bed wear time in hip-worn accelerometer data collected with a 24 h wear protocol in young adults.
    McVeigh JA; Winkler EA; Healy GN; Slater J; Eastwood PR; Straker LM
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Oct; 37(10):1636-1652. PubMed ID: 27652717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.