BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25341156)

  • 1. Imaging management of palpable breast abnormalities.
    Lehman CD; Lee AY; Lee CI
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Nov; 203(5):1142-53. PubMed ID: 25341156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Utility of Diagnostic Mammography as the Primary Imaging Modality for Palpable Lumps in Women With Almost Entirely Fatty Breasts.
    Linden OE; Hayward JH; Price ER; Kelil T; Joe BN; Lee AY
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Apr; 214(4):938-944. PubMed ID: 32023120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Specificity of mammography and US in the evaluation of a palpable abnormality: retrospective review.
    Moy L; Slanetz PJ; Moore R; Satija S; Yeh ED; McCarthy KA; Hall D; Staffa M; Rafferty EA; Halpern E; Kopans DB
    Radiology; 2002 Oct; 225(1):176-81. PubMed ID: 12355002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Value of palpation findings in breast examination].
    Mühlberger G; Lauth G
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1993 Nov; 53(11):772-5. PubMed ID: 8293942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with palpable breast abnormalities and negative mammographic and sonographic findings.
    Yalniz C; Campbell D; Le-Petross C; Shin K; Bevers TB; Hess KR; Whitman GJ
    Breast J; 2020 Jul; 26(7):1289-1295. PubMed ID: 32108973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Utility and Outcomes of Imaging Evaluation for Palpable Lumps in the Postmastectomy Patient.
    Dashevsky BZ; Hayward JH; Woodard GA; Joe BN; Lee AY
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Aug; 213(2):464-472. PubMed ID: 31039027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
    Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical Value of Mammography in the Evaluation of Palpable Breast Lumps in Women 30 Years Old and Older.
    Brown AL; Phillips J; Slanetz PJ; Fein-Zachary V; Venkataraman S; Dialani V; Mehta TS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Oct; 209(4):935-942. PubMed ID: 28777649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Breast biopsy avoidance: the value of normal mammograms and normal sonograms in the setting of a palpable lump.
    Dennis MA; Parker SH; Klaus AJ; Stavros AT; Kaske TI; Clark SB
    Radiology; 2001 Apr; 219(1):186-91. PubMed ID: 11274555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. US as the Primary Imaging Modality in the Evaluation of Palpable Breast Masses in Breastfeeding Women, Including Those of Advanced Maternal Age.
    Chung M; Hayward JH; Woodard GA; Knobel A; Greenwood HI; Ray KM; Joe BN; Lee AY
    Radiology; 2020 Nov; 297(2):316-324. PubMed ID: 32870133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Short-term follow-up of palpable breast lesions with benign imaging features: evaluation of 375 lesions in 320 women.
    Harvey JA; Nicholson BT; Lorusso AP; Cohen MA; Bovbjerg VE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Dec; 193(6):1723-30. PubMed ID: 19933671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Role of high frequency ultrasonography in the evaluation of palpable breast masses in Chinese women: alternative to mammography?
    Yang WT; Mok CO; King W; Tang A; Metreweli C
    J Ultrasound Med; 1996 Sep; 15(9):637-44. PubMed ID: 8866446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinically palpable breast abnormalities with normal imaging: is clinically guided biopsy still required?
    Gumus H; Gumus M; Mills P; Fish D; Devalia H; Jones SE; Jones PA; Sever AR
    Clin Radiol; 2012 May; 67(5):437-40. PubMed ID: 22119297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Palpable masses in breast during lactation.
    Obenauer S; Dammert S
    Clin Imaging; 2007; 31(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 17189838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New Palpable Breast Lump With Recent Negative Mammogram: Is Repeat Mammography Necessary?
    Leung SE; Ben-Nachum I; Kornecki A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jul; 207(1):200-4. PubMed ID: 27081707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detection and evaluation of a palpable breast mass.
    Pruthi S
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2001 Jun; 76(6):641-7; quiz 647-8. PubMed ID: 11393504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breast pain in Ghanaian women: clinical, ultrasonographic, mammographic and histological findings in 1612 consecutive patients.
    Ohene-Yeboah M
    West Afr J Med; 2008 Jan; 27(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 18689298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of diagnostic mammography and breast ultrasound during pregnancy and lactation.
    Robbins J; Jeffries D; Roubidoux M; Helvie M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Mar; 196(3):716-22. PubMed ID: 21343518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted?
    Graf O; Helbich TH; Fuchsjaeger MH; Hopf G; Morgun M; Graf C; Mallek R; Sickles EA
    Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):850-6. PubMed ID: 15486217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Breast leukemia: an update.
    Surov A; Wienke A; Abbas J
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Apr; 53(3):261-6. PubMed ID: 22496426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.