These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25341315)

  • 41. Aruna Shanbaug and the right to die with dignity: the battle continues.
    Kishore RR
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2016; 1(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 26826660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Compassion in Dying v. State of Washington.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, en banc
    Fed Report; 1996 Mar; 79():790-859. PubMed ID: 11648417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Decision-making at the end of life: the termination of life-prolonging treatment, euthanasia (mercy-killing) and assisted suicide in Canada in South Africa.
    Sneiderman B; McQuoid-Mason D
    Comp Int Law J South Afr; 2000 Jul; 33(2):193-209. PubMed ID: 12425314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The Terry Schiavo case: possible implications for India.
    Mamdani B
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2005; 2(3):97-8. PubMed ID: 16276660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Withdrawal of feeding-tubes from incompetent patients: the Terri Schiavo case raises new issues regarding who decides in end-of-life decision making.
    Silverman HJ
    Intensive Care Med; 2005 Mar; 31(3):480-1. PubMed ID: 15666141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [End-of-life care and end-of-life medical decisions: the ITAELD study].
    Miccinesi G; Puliti D; Paci E
    Epidemiol Prev; 2011; 35(3-4):178-87. PubMed ID: 21914914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Deciding for others: New York law and the rights of incompetent persons to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining medical treatment.
    Martino M
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1996; 41(1):285-308. PubMed ID: 12718312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Interpretation: a confounding factor.
    Gupta M
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2016; 1(2):130. PubMed ID: 27260827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. End-of-life decision making, therapeutic jurisprudence, and preventive law: hierarchical v. consensus-based decision-making model.
    Hafemeister TL
    Ariz Law Rev; 1999; 41(2):329-73. PubMed ID: 12666690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Whose rite is it anyway?: the search for a constitutional permit to die.
    Berman MB
    Southwest Univ Law Rev; 1992; 22(1):105-58. PubMed ID: 11656255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Ethics roundtable debate: withdrawal of tube feeding in a patient with persistent vegetative state where the patients wishes are unclear and there is family dissension.
    Buckley T; Crippen D; DeWitt AL; Fisher M; Liolios A; Scheetz CL; Whetstine LM
    Crit Care; 2004 Apr; 8(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 15025760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Moral reasoning and legal change: observations on the termination of medical treatment and the development of law.
    Jarrett C
    Rutgers Law J; 1988; 19(4):999-1028. PubMed ID: 11650183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Paradox and Pandora's box: the tragedy of current right-to-die jurisprudence.
    Roach CA
    Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1991; 25(1):133-90. PubMed ID: 16145810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Euthanasia and other decisions at the end of life (Proposal for a more transparent terminology and some thoughts on the legal framework of medical treatment)].
    Vadász G
    Orv Hetil; 2010 Oct; 151(43):1769-75. PubMed ID: 20940116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Pettis v. Smith and Braddock. In the Louisiana Court of Appeal.
    Bostrom BA
    Issues Law Med; 2005; 20(3):271-3. PubMed ID: 15916260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Physician-assisted suicide and New York law.
    Alesandro JA
    Albany Law Rev; 1994; 57(3):819-925. PubMed ID: 11652867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Do Legal Issues Deserve Space in Specialty Medical Journals ?
    Nagpal N
    J Assoc Physicians India; 2016 Feb; 64(2):86-87. PubMed ID: 27730795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Whose life is it anyway?: an analysis and commentary on the emerging law of physician-assisted suicide.
    Gaumer CP; Griffith PR
    S D Law Rev; 1997; 42(3):357-98. PubMed ID: 16086516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Give me liberty and give me death: assisted suicide as a fundamental liberty interest.
    Kline RL
    Boston Univ Public Interest Law J; 1997; 6(2):527-50. PubMed ID: 16485372
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Letting patients die: legal and moral reflections.
    Kadish SH
    Calif Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 80(4):857-88. PubMed ID: 11652646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.