These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25341406)

  • 1. Fundamental rate-loss tradeoff for optical quantum key distribution.
    Takeoka M; Guha S; Wilde MM
    Nat Commun; 2014 Oct; 5():5235. PubMed ID: 25341406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Overcoming the rate-distance limit of quantum key distribution without quantum repeaters.
    Lucamarini M; Yuan ZL; Dynes JF; Shields AJ
    Nature; 2018 May; 557(7705):400-403. PubMed ID: 29720656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fundamental limits of repeaterless quantum communications.
    Pirandola S; Laurenza R; Ottaviani C; Banchi L
    Nat Commun; 2017 Apr; 8():15043. PubMed ID: 28443624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fundamental rate-loss trade-off for the quantum internet.
    Azuma K; Mizutani A; Lo HK
    Nat Commun; 2016 Nov; 7():13523. PubMed ID: 27886172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perspectives and limitations of QKD integration in metropolitan area networks.
    Aleksic S; Hipp F; Winkler D; Poppe A; Schrenk B; Franzl G
    Opt Express; 2015 Apr; 23(8):10359-73. PubMed ID: 25969077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. All-photonic intercity quantum key distribution.
    Azuma K; Tamaki K; Munro WJ
    Nat Commun; 2015 Dec; 6():10171. PubMed ID: 26671044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Limitations on quantum key repeaters.
    Bäuml S; Christandl M; Horodecki K; Winter A
    Nat Commun; 2015 Apr; 6():6908. PubMed ID: 25903096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lower and upper bounds on the secret-key rate for quantum key distribution protocols using one-way classical communication.
    Kraus B; Gisin N; Renner R
    Phys Rev Lett; 2005 Aug; 95(8):080501. PubMed ID: 16196841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Finite-key analysis for twin-field quantum key distribution based on generalized operator dominance condition.
    Wang RQ; Yin ZQ; Lu FY; Wang R; Wang S; Chen W; Huang W; Xu BJ; Guo GC; Han ZF
    Opt Express; 2020 Jul; 28(15):22594-22605. PubMed ID: 32752517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Proof-of-Principle Experimental Demonstration of Twin-Field Type Quantum Key Distribution.
    Zhong X; Hu J; Curty M; Qian L; Lo HK
    Phys Rev Lett; 2019 Sep; 123(10):100506. PubMed ID: 31573297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Entanglement-based secure quantum cryptography over 1,120 kilometres.
    Yin J; Li YH; Liao SK; Yang M; Cao Y; Zhang L; Ren JG; Cai WQ; Liu WY; Li SL; Shu R; Huang YM; Deng L; Li L; Zhang Q; Liu NL; Chen YA; Lu CY; Wang XB; Xu F; Wang JY; Peng CZ; Ekert AK; Pan JW
    Nature; 2020 Jun; 582(7813):501-505. PubMed ID: 32541968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantum-locked key distribution at nearly the classical capacity rate.
    Lupo C; Lloyd S
    Phys Rev Lett; 2014 Oct; 113(16):160502. PubMed ID: 25361242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. All-photonic quantum repeaters.
    Azuma K; Tamaki K; Lo HK
    Nat Commun; 2015 Apr; 6():6787. PubMed ID: 25873153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. More optimal relativistic quantum key distribution.
    Bebrov G
    Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):15377. PubMed ID: 36100618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution.
    Lo HK; Curty M; Qi B
    Phys Rev Lett; 2012 Mar; 108(13):130503. PubMed ID: 22540686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Satellite-to-ground quantum key distribution.
    Liao SK; Cai WQ; Liu WY; Zhang L; Li Y; Ren JG; Yin J; Shen Q; Cao Y; Li ZP; Li FZ; Chen XW; Sun LH; Jia JJ; Wu JC; Jiang XJ; Wang JF; Huang YM; Wang Q; Zhou YL; Deng L; Xi T; Ma L; Hu T; Zhang Q; Chen YA; Liu NL; Wang XB; Zhu ZC; Lu CY; Shu R; Peng CZ; Wang JY; Pan JW
    Nature; 2017 Sep; 549(7670):43-47. PubMed ID: 28825707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Unconstrained Capacities of Quantum Key Distribution and Entanglement Distillation for Pure-Loss Bosonic Broadcast Channels.
    Takeoka M; Seshadreesan KP; Wilde MM
    Phys Rev Lett; 2017 Oct; 119(15):150501. PubMed ID: 29077433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sending-or-Not-Sending with Independent Lasers: Secure Twin-Field Quantum Key Distribution over 509 km.
    Chen JP; Zhang C; Liu Y; Jiang C; Zhang W; Hu XL; Guan JY; Yu ZW; Xu H; Lin J; Li MJ; Chen H; Li H; You L; Wang Z; Wang XB; Zhang Q; Pan JW
    Phys Rev Lett; 2020 Feb; 124(7):070501. PubMed ID: 32142314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multi-tenant secret-key assignment over quantum key distribution networks.
    Cao Y; Zhao Y; Lin R; Yu X; Zhang J; Chen J
    Opt Express; 2019 Feb; 27(3):2544-2561. PubMed ID: 30732291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Parameter Estimation with Almost No Public Communication for Continuous-Variable Quantum Key Distribution.
    Lupo C; Ottaviani C; Papanastasiou P; Pirandola S
    Phys Rev Lett; 2018 Jun; 120(22):220505. PubMed ID: 29906175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.