These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25341974)

  • 1. Biomechanical analysis of differential pull-out strengths of bone screws using cervical anterior transpedicular technique in normal and osteoporotic cervical cadaveric spines.
    Wu C; Chen C; Wu W; Zhao W; Sun P; Fan J; Bi Z; Zhang J; Ouyang J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jan; 40(1):E1-8. PubMed ID: 25341974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A biomechanical study to evaluate the effect of PMMA augmentation and restoration of the strength of cervical vertebral screws inserted in an osteoporotic vertebral body.
    Chen C; Zhao W; Liu D; Sun P; Wu C; Ouyang J
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Jun; 27(4):224-31. PubMed ID: 24866906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength.
    Burval DJ; McLain RF; Milks R; Inceoglu S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):1077-83. PubMed ID: 17471088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of the degree of osteoporosis on the biomechanical anchoring strength of the sacral pedicle screws: an in vitro comparison between unaugmented bicortical screws and polymethylmethacrylate augmented unicortical screws.
    Zhuang XM; Yu BS; Zheng ZM; Zhang JF; Lu WW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):E925-31. PubMed ID: 20098349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of screw augmentation in posterior dynamic and rigid stabilization systems in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: a biomechanical cadaveric study.
    Hoppe S; Loosli Y; Baumgartner D; Heini P; Benneker L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(6):E384-9. PubMed ID: 24384660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cervical anterior transpedicular screw fixation (ATPS)--Part II. Accuracy of manual insertion and pull-out strength of ATPS.
    Koller H; Acosta F; Tauber M; Fox M; Martin H; Forstner R; Augat P; Penzkofer R; Pirich C; Kässmann H; Resch H; Hitzl W
    Eur Spine J; 2008 Apr; 17(4):539-55. PubMed ID: 18224357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Construct stability of an instrumented 2-level cervical corpectomy model following fatigue testing: biomechanical comparison of circumferential antero-posterior instrumentation versus a novel anterior-only transpedicular screw-plate fixation technique.
    Koller H; Schmoelz W; Zenner J; Auffarth A; Resch H; Hitzl W; Malekzadeh D; Ernstbrunner L; Blocher M; Mayer M
    Eur Spine J; 2015 Dec; 24(12):2848-56. PubMed ID: 25612849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical Comparisons of Pull Out Strengths After Pedicle Screw Augmentation with Hydroxyapatite, Calcium Phosphate, or Polymethylmethacrylate in the Cadaveric Spine.
    Yi S; Rim DC; Park SW; Murovic JA; Lim J; Park J
    World Neurosurg; 2015 Jun; 83(6):976-81. PubMed ID: 25769482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anterior transpedicular screw fixation of cervical spine: Is it safe? Morphological feasibility, technical properties, and accuracy of manual insertion.
    Koktekir E; Toktas ZO; Seker A; Akakin A; Konya D; Kilic T
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jun; 22(6):596-604. PubMed ID: 25815805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical comparative study of the stability of injectable pedicle screws with different lateral holes augmented with different volumes of polymethylmethacrylate in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae.
    Liu D; Sheng J; Luo Y; Huang C; Wu HH; Zhou JJ; Zhang XJ; Zheng W
    Spine J; 2018 Sep; 18(9):1637-1644. PubMed ID: 29567517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical study of injectable hollow pedicle screws for PMMA augmentation in severely osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: effect of PMMA distribution and volume on screw stability.
    Liu D; Sheng J; Wu HH; Kang X; Xie QY; Luo Y; Zhou JJ; Zheng W
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Dec; 29(6):639-646. PubMed ID: 30192220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical comparison of pedicle screw augmented with different volumes of polymethylmethacrylate in osteoporotic and severely osteoporotic cadaveric lumbar vertebrae: an experimental study.
    Liu D; Zhang B; Xie QY; Kang X; Zhou JJ; Wang CR; Lei W; Zheng W
    Spine J; 2016 Sep; 16(9):1124-32. PubMed ID: 27130374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cervical anterior transpedicular screw fixation. Part I: Study on morphological feasibility, indications, and technical prerequisites.
    Koller H; Hempfing A; Acosta F; Fox M; Scheiter A; Tauber M; Holz U; Resch H; Hitzl W
    Eur Spine J; 2008 Apr; 17(4):523-38. PubMed ID: 18224358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparison of statics characteristics between anterior transpedicular screws system and vertebral body screws system in lower cervical spine].
    Zhao LJ; Li J; Jiang WY; Xu RM; Ma WH; Qi F; Yu L; Zhang M; Wang YJ
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2014 Feb; 27(2):118-22. PubMed ID: 24826474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. PMMA-augmentation of incompletely cannulated pedicle screws: a cadaver study to determine the benefits in the osteoporotic spine.
    Goost H; Deborre C; Wirtz DC; Burger C; Prescher A; Fölsch C; Pflugmacher R; Kabir K
    Technol Health Care; 2014; 22(4):607-15. PubMed ID: 24837053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Metaphyseal screw augmentation of the LISS-PLT plate with polymethylmethacrylate improves angular stability in osteoporotic proximal third tibial fractures: a biomechanical study in human cadaveric tibiae.
    Goetzen M; Nicolino T; Hofmann-Fliri L; Blauth M; Windolf M
    J Orthop Trauma; 2014 May; 28(5):294-9. PubMed ID: 24296600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical comparison of two-level cervical locking posterior screw/rod and hook/rod techniques.
    Espinoza-Larios A; Ames CP; Chamberlain RH; Sonntag VK; Dickman CA; Crawford NR
    Spine J; 2007; 7(2):194-204. PubMed ID: 17321969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine reconstructive techniques after a multilevel corpectomy of the cervical spine.
    Singh K; Vaccaro AR; Kim J; Lorenz EP; Lim TH; An HS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):2352-8; discussion 2358. PubMed ID: 14560082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical comparison of different techniques in primary spinal surgery in osteoporotic cadaveric lumbar vertebrae: expansive pedicle screw versus polymethylmethacrylate-augmented pedicle screw.
    Liu D; Wu ZX; Pan XM; Fu SC; Gao MX; Shi L; Lei W
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2011 Sep; 131(9):1227-32. PubMed ID: 21387138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of fluoroscopy versus computer-assisted navigation for the placement of anterior cervical pedicle screws.
    Patton AG; Morris RP; Kuo YF; Lindsey RW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Apr; 40(7):E404-10. PubMed ID: 25599290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.