BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25343019)

  • 1. Masking Release for Igbo and English.
    Ebem DU; Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD; Uguru JO
    Afr J Comput Ict; 2013 Sep; 6(3):119-126. PubMed ID: 25343019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reception thresholds for sentences in quiet and noise for monolingual English and bilingual Mandarin-English listeners.
    Stuart A; Zhang J; Swink S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Apr; 21(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 20388450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech perception in quiet and noise using the hearing in noise test and the Japanese hearing in noise test by Japanese listeners.
    Nakamura K; Gordon-Salant S
    Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):121-31. PubMed ID: 20628303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO.
    Tamati TN; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct; 25(9):869-92. PubMed ID: 25405842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech-on-speech masking with variable access to the linguistic content of the masker speech for native and nonnative english speakers.
    Calandruccio L; Bradlow AR; Dhar S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Apr; 25(4):355-66. PubMed ID: 25126683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Listening Effort During Sentence Processing Is Increased for Non-native Listeners: A Pupillometry Study.
    Borghini G; Hazan V
    Front Neurosci; 2018; 12():152. PubMed ID: 29593489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Similarity and familiarity: Second language sentence recognition in first- and second-language multi-talker babble.
    Van Engen KJ
    Speech Commun; 2010 Dec; 52(11-12):943-953. PubMed ID: 21179561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
    Peng ZE; Wang LM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intelligibility of Noise-Adapted and Clear Speech in Energetic and Informational Maskers for Native and Nonnative Listeners.
    Meemann K; Smiljanić R
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Apr; 65(4):1263-1281. PubMed ID: 35235410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Audibility of American English vowels produced by English-, Chinese-, and Korean-native speakers in long-term speech-shaped noise.
    Liu C; Jin SH
    Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):49-55. PubMed ID: 21920420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of speech-shaped noise on the recognition of malayalam and english consonants by malayalam listeners.
    Kalaiah MK; Bhat JS; Shastri U
    Noise Health; 2019; 21(99):55-61. PubMed ID: 32174639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Second Language Experience Facilitates Sentence Recognition in Temporally-Modulated Noise for Non-native Listeners.
    Guan J; Cao X; Liu C
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():631060. PubMed ID: 33897538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mandarin Chinese vowel-plus-tone identification in noise: Effects of language experience.
    Li M; Wang W; Tao S; Dong Q; Guan J; Liu C
    Hear Res; 2016 Jan; 331():109-18. PubMed ID: 26611794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech Recognition in Noise in Adults and Children Who Speak English or Chinese as Their First Language.
    Schafer EC; Aoyama K; Ho T; Castillo P; Conlin J; Jones J; Thompson S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018; 29(10):885-897. PubMed ID: 30479261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of noise and proficiency on intelligibility of Chinese-accented English.
    Rogers CL; Dalby J; Nishi K
    Lang Speech; 2004; 47(Pt 2):139-54. PubMed ID: 15581189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Toward a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of masker type and signal-to-noise ratio on the pupillary response while performing a speech-in-noise test.
    Wendt D; Koelewijn T; Książek P; Kramer SE; Lunner T
    Hear Res; 2018 Nov; 369():67-78. PubMed ID: 29858121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. English vowel identification in quiet and noise: effects of listeners' native language background.
    Jin SH; Liu C
    Front Neurosci; 2014; 8():305. PubMed ID: 25400538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does the degree of linguistic experience (native versus nonnative) modulate the degree to which listeners can benefit from a delay between the onset of the maskers and the onset of the target speech?
    Ben-David BM; Avivi-Reich M; Schneider BA
    Hear Res; 2016 Nov; 341():9-18. PubMed ID: 27496539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech perception in noise by monolingual, bilingual and trilingual listeners.
    Tabri D; Abou Chacra KM; Pring T
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2011; 46(4):411-22. PubMed ID: 21771217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relative Weighting of Semantic and Syntactic Cues in Native and Non-Native Listeners' Recognition of English Sentences.
    Shi LF; Koenig LL
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):424-33. PubMed ID: 26783854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.