These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25343620)

  • 1. Random-effects, fixed-effects and the within-between specification for clustered data in observational health studies: a simulation study.
    Dieleman JL; Templin T
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e110257. PubMed ID: 25343620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of number of clusters and magnitude of within-cluster homogeneity in outcomes on the performance of four variance estimators for a marginal multivariable Cox regression model fit to clustered data in the context of observational research.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2024 Jul; 43(17):3264-3279. PubMed ID: 38822699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A readily available improvement over method of moments for intra-cluster correlation estimation in the context of cluster randomized trials and fitting a GEE-type marginal model for binary outcomes.
    Westgate PM
    Clin Trials; 2019 Feb; 16(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 30295512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving causal inference with a doubly robust estimator that combines propensity score stratification and weighting.
    Linden A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 23(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 28116816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unbiased K-L estimator for the linear regression model.
    Aladeitan B; Lukman AF; Davids E; Oranye EH; Kibria GBM
    F1000Res; 2021; 10():832. PubMed ID: 35186270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating overdispersion in sparse multinomial data.
    Afroz F; Parry M; Fletcher D
    Biometrics; 2020 Sep; 76(3):834-842. PubMed ID: 31785150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimation After a Group Sequential Trial.
    Milanzi E; Molenberghs G; Alonso A; Kenward MG; Tsiatis AA; Davidian M; Verbeke G
    Stat Biosci; 2015 Oct; 7(2):187-205. PubMed ID: 26478751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of methods to handle skew distributed cost variables in the analysis of the resource consumption in schizophrenia treatment.
    Kilian R; Matschinger H; Löeffler W; Roick C; Angermeyer MC
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2002 Mar; 5(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 12529567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modified Liu estimators in the linear regression model: An application to Tobacco data.
    Babar I; Ayed H; Chand S; Suhail M; Khan YA; Marzouki R
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0259991. PubMed ID: 34807916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On a preference-based instrumental variable approach in reducing unmeasured confounding-by-indication.
    Li Y; Lee Y; Wolfe RA; Morgenstern H; Zhang J; Port FK; Robinson BM
    Stat Med; 2015 Mar; 34(7):1150-68. PubMed ID: 25546152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Better performance for right-skewed data using an alternative gamma model.
    Veazie P; Intrator O; Kinosian B; Phibbs CS
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Dec; 23(1):298. PubMed ID: 38102539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing causal treatment effect estimation when using large observational datasets.
    John ER; Abrams KR; Brightling CE; Sheehan NA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):207. PubMed ID: 31726969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimators and confidence intervals for the marginal odds ratio using logistic regression and propensity score stratification.
    Stampf S; Graf E; Schmoor C; Schumacher M
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):760-9. PubMed ID: 20213703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of statistical approaches for physician-randomized trials with survival outcomes.
    Stedman MR; Lew RA; Losina E; Gagnon DR; Solomon DH; Brookhart MA
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2012 Jan; 33(1):104-15. PubMed ID: 21924382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in combining results of studies.
    Sidik K; Jonkman JN
    Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(9):1964-81. PubMed ID: 16955539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simple estimators of the intensity of seasonal occurrence.
    Brookhart MA; Rothman KJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2008 Oct; 8():67. PubMed ID: 18945366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A bootstrap version of the Hausman test to assess the impact of cluster-level endogeneity beyond the random intercept model.
    Talloen W; Loeys T; Moerkerke B
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 30663379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Comparison of Fixed-Effects and Random-Effects Models for Multivariate Meta-Analysis Using an SEM Approach.
    Cai Z; Fan X
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(6):839-854. PubMed ID: 31726881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Blinded sample size re-estimation in three-arm trials with 'gold standard' design.
    Mütze T; Friede T
    Stat Med; 2017 Oct; 36(23):3636-3653. PubMed ID: 28608469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantifying and reducing inequity in average treatment effect estimation.
    Nieser KJ; Cochran AL
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Dec; 23(1):297. PubMed ID: 38102563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.