187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25344296)
1. Does the benefit of testing depend on lag, and if so, why? Evaluating the elaborative retrieval hypothesis.
Rawson KA; Vaughn KE; Carpenter SK
Mem Cognit; 2015 May; 43(4):619-33. PubMed ID: 25344296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: the benefits of elaborative retrieval.
Carpenter SK
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1563-9. PubMed ID: 19857026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differentiation of subsequent memory effects between retrieval practice and elaborative study.
Liu Y; Rosburg T; Gao C; Weber C; Guo C
Biol Psychol; 2017 Jul; 127():134-147. PubMed ID: 28552619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Why is test-restudy practice beneficial for memory? An evaluation of the mediator shift hypothesis.
Pyc MA; Rawson KA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):737-46. PubMed ID: 22060276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The testing effect under divided attention.
Buchin ZL; Mulligan NW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1934-1947. PubMed ID: 28504527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Elaborative retrieval: Do semantic mediators improve memory?
Lehman M; Karpicke JD
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1573-1591. PubMed ID: 26974674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention: support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect.
Carpenter SK; DeLosh EL
Mem Cognit; 2006 Mar; 34(2):268-76. PubMed ID: 16752591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Are judgments of learning made after correct responses during retrieval practice sensitive to lag and criterion level effects?
Pyc MA; Rawson KA
Mem Cognit; 2012 Aug; 40(6):976-88. PubMed ID: 22399224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Metacognitive control in self-regulated learning: Conditions affecting the choice of restudying versus retrieval practice.
Toppino TC; LaVan MH; Iaconelli RT
Mem Cognit; 2018 Oct; 46(7):1164-1177. PubMed ID: 29845590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dissociating neural correlates of retrieval practice and elaborative study in associative recognition memory.
Liu Y; Mao X; Peng Y; Lu B; Guo C
Neuroreport; 2019 Oct; 30(15):985-992. PubMed ID: 31464838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping.
Karpicke JD; Blunt JR
Science; 2011 Feb; 331(6018):772-5. PubMed ID: 21252317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retrieval activates related words more than presentation.
Hausman H; Rhodes MG
Memory; 2018 Oct; 26(9):1265-1280. PubMed ID: 29571266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Testing and feedback effects on front-end control over later retrieval.
Thomas RC; McDaniel MA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):437-50. PubMed ID: 22732026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diminishing-cues retrieval practice: A memory-enhancing technique that works when regular testing doesn't.
Fiechter JL; Benjamin AS
Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1868-1876. PubMed ID: 28849580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transfer of Test-Enhanced Learning.
DiMarco D; Marmurek H
Exp Psychol; 2022 May; 69(3):119-131. PubMed ID: 35975624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Test-potentiated learning: three independent replications, a disconfirmed hypothesis, and an unexpected boundary condition.
Wissman KT; Rawson KA
Memory; 2018 Apr; 26(4):406-414. PubMed ID: 28691577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Benefits from retrieval practice are greater for students with lower working memory capacity.
Agarwal PK; Finley JR; Rose NS; Roediger HL
Memory; 2017 Jul; 25(6):764-771. PubMed ID: 27531308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Testing the primary and convergent retrieval model of recall: Recall practice produces faster recall success but also faster recall failure.
Hopper WJ; Huber DE
Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):816-841. PubMed ID: 30737729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The testing effect for mediator final test cues and related final test cues in online and laboratory experiments.
Coppens LC; Verkoeijen PP; Bouwmeester S; Rikers RM
BMC Psychol; 2016 May; 4(1):25. PubMed ID: 27240421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Attention and the testing effect.
Mulligan NW; Picklesimer M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jun; 42(6):938-50. PubMed ID: 26618913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
