269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25344420)
1. Minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer: a comprehensive review.
Rabinovich A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Apr; 291(4):721-7. PubMed ID: 25344420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer.
Rabinovich A
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Aug; 27(4):302-7. PubMed ID: 26134173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Postoperative pain medication requirements in patients undergoing computer-assisted (“Robotic”) and standard laparoscopic procedures for newly diagnosed endometrial cancer.
Leitao MM; Malhotra V; Briscoe G; Suidan R; Dholakiya P; Santos K; Jewell EL; Brown CL; Sonoda Y; Abu-Rustum NR; Barakat RR; Gardner GJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Oct; 20(11):3561-7. PubMed ID: 23797751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Robot assisted endometrial cancer staging - evaluation the first 100 operations and comparing the first andthe last 30 operations].
Marek R; Dzvinčuk P; Kudela M; Hambálek P; Maděrka M; Zapletalová J; Pilka R
Ceska Gynekol; 2015 Oct; 80(5):324-32. PubMed ID: 26606116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgical staging for endometrial cancer are equivalent to traditional laparoscopic staging at a minimally invasive surgical center.
Cardenas-Goicoechea J; Adams S; Bhat SB; Randall TC
Gynecol Oncol; 2010 May; 117(2):224-8. PubMed ID: 20144471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical outcomes in endometrial cancer care when the standard of care shifts from open surgery to robotics.
Mok ZW; Yong EL; Low JJ; Ng JS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jun; 22(5):819-25. PubMed ID: 22561178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surgical and oncological outcome of robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic and abdominal surgery in the management of endometrial cancer.
Corrado G; Cutillo G; Pomati G; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Vincenzoni C; Baiocco E; Vizza E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1074-81. PubMed ID: 26002986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Perioperative and Oncologic Outcomes with Laparotomy, and Laparoscopic or Robotic Surgery for Women with Endometrial Cancer.
Manchana T; Puangsricharoen P; Sirisabya N; Worasethsin P; Vasuratna A; Termrungruanglert W; Tresukosol D
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(13):5483-8. PubMed ID: 26225698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimally invasive surgical approaches for patients with endometrial cancer.
Frumovitz M; Escobar P; Ramirez PT
Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jun; 54(2):226-34. PubMed ID: 21508692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of age on surgical staging and approaches (laparotomy, laparoscopy and robotic surgery) in endometrial cancer management.
Bourgin C; Lambaudie E; Houvenaeghel G; Foucher F; Levêque J; Lavoué V
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):703-709. PubMed ID: 27955835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of Robotic Platforms on Surgical Approach and Costs in the Management of Morbidly Obese Patients with Newly Diagnosed Uterine Cancer.
Leitao MM; Narain WR; Boccamazzo D; Sioulas V; Cassella D; Ducie JA; Eriksson AG; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Brown CL; Levine DA; Jewell EL; Zivanovic O; Barakat RR; Abu-Rustum NR; Gardner GJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Jul; 23(7):2192-8. PubMed ID: 26744108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of three surgical approaches for staging lymphadenectomy in high-risk endometrial cancer.
Pulman KJ; Dason ES; Philp L; Bernardini MQ; Ferguson SE; Laframboise S; Atenafu EG; May T
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Mar; 136(3):315-319. PubMed ID: 28078775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of two minimally invasive approaches to endometrial cancer staging: a single-surgeon experience.
Frey MK; Lin JF; Stewart LE; Makaroun L; Panico VJ; Holcomb K
J Reprod Med; 2015; 60(3-4):127-34. PubMed ID: 25898475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
Mäenpää MM; Nieminen K; Tomás EI; Laurila M; Luukkaala TH; Mäenpää JU
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):588.e1-588.e7. PubMed ID: 27288987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer: does operative start time impact surgical and oncologic outcomes?
Slaughter KN; Frumovitz M; Schmeler KM; Nick AM; Fleming ND; dos Reis R; Munsell MF; Westin SN; Soliman PT; Ramirez PT
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Aug; 134(2):248-52. PubMed ID: 24945591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective, comparative study on robotic versus open-surgery hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma.
Eklind S; Lindfors A; Sjöli P; Dahm-Kähler P
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Feb; 25(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 25611898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surgical outcome of robotic surgery in morbidly obese patient with endometrial cancer compared to laparotomy.
Bernardini MQ; Gien LT; Tipping H; Murphy J; Rosen BP
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jan; 22(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 22134121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
