These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25344758)

  • 41. Mario Monicelli's Grande guerra: the right of living and the choice of dying.
    Gulino M; Frati G; Vergallo GM; Frati P
    J Med Ethics; 2011 Sep; 37(9):573-6. PubMed ID: 21685146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. To die, to sleep: US physicians' religious and other objections to physician-assisted suicide, terminal sedation, and withdrawal of life support.
    Curlin FA; Nwodim C; Vance JL; Chin MH; Lantos JD
    Am J Hosp Palliat Care; 2008; 25(2):112-20. PubMed ID: 18198363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Care for the dying patient: what is allowed for the physician?].
    Oberhofer E
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2015 Nov; 157(19):18-9. PubMed ID: 26953390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Concepts and debates in end-of-life care.
    Chakravarty A; Kapoor P
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2012; 9(3):202-6. PubMed ID: 22864083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The effect of statutory limitations on the authority of substitute decision makers on the care of patients in the intensive care unit: case examples and review of state laws affecting withdrawing or withholding life-sustaining treatment.
    Venkat A; Becker J
    J Intensive Care Med; 2014; 29(2):71-80. PubMed ID: 22257784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Religious advance directives: the convergence of law, religion, medicine, and public health.
    Grodin MA
    Am J Public Health; 1993 Jun; 83(6):899-903. PubMed ID: 8498633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment in a patient's best interests: Australian judicial deliberations.
    Willmott L; White B; Smith MK; Wilkinson DJ
    Med J Aust; 2014 Nov; 201(9):545-7. PubMed ID: 25358584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Legal issues of physician-assisted euthanasia. Part III--Passive euthanasia, comparison of international legislation, conclusions for medical practice].
    Laux J; Röbel A; Parzeller M
    Arch Kriminol; 2013; 231(3-4):73-115. PubMed ID: 23678624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Israel: bioethics in a Jewish-democratic state.
    Gross ML; Ravitsky V
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2003; 12(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 12889328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Orthodox Jewish perspectives on withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment.
    Baeke G; Wils JP; Broeckaert B
    Nurs Ethics; 2011 Nov; 18(6):835-46. PubMed ID: 21974944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The case of Samuel Golubchuk and the right to be spared an excruciating death.
    Bailey TM; Leier B
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Mar; 10(3):67-8. PubMed ID: 20229429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Informed consent in the patients' rights law].
    Figueroa G R
    Rev Med Chil; 2012 Oct; 140(10):1347-51. PubMed ID: 23559295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Legal and policy lessons from the Schiavo case: is our right to choose the medical care we want seriously at risk?
    Lazzarini Z; Arons S; Wisniewski A
    Palliat Support Care; 2006 Jun; 4(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 16903585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Ethical and legal issues in cases of withdrawing treatment from an incompetent patient in Italy.
    Veshi D
    Med Law; 2013 Dec; 32(4):577-85. PubMed ID: 24552117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Navigating the chasm between religious and secular perspectives in modern bioethics.
    Jotkowitz AB; Glick S
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Jun; 35(6):357-60. PubMed ID: 19482978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Medical decisions concerning the end of life: a discussion with Japanese physicians.
    Asai A; Fukuhara S; Inoshita O; Miura Y; Tanabe N; Kurokawa K
    J Med Ethics; 1997 Oct; 23(5):323-7. PubMed ID: 9358355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Choosing life after death: respecting religious beliefs and moral convictions in near death decisions.
    Goldberg CK
    Syracuse Law Rev; 1988; 39(4):1197-260. PubMed ID: 11653917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The United States Revised Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (2006): new challenges to balancing patient rights and physician responsibilities.
    Verheijde JL; Rady MY; McGregor JL
    Philos Ethics Humanit Med; 2007 Sep; 2():19. PubMed ID: 17850664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Clinically assisted hydration and the Liverpool Care Pathway: Catholic ethics and clinical evidence.
    Nowarska A
    J Med Ethics; 2015 Aug; 41(8):645-9. PubMed ID: 25034970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Is the clock ticking for terminally ill patients in Israel? Preliminary comment on a proposal for a bill of rights for the terminally ill.
    Barilan YM
    J Med Ethics; 2004 Aug; 30(4):353-7; discussion 358. PubMed ID: 15289517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.