BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25344960)

  • 1. Effectiveness of safety-engineered devices in reducing sharp object injuries.
    Lu Y; Senthilselvan A; Joffe AM; Beach J
    Occup Med (Lond); 2015 Jan; 65(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 25344960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of the introduction of an engineered sharps injury prevention device on the percutaneous injury rate in healthcare workers.
    Azar-Cavanagh M; Burdt P; Green-McKenzie J
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 28(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 17265397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of gloves and reduction of risk of injury caused by needles or sharp medical devices in healthcare workers: results from a case-crossover study.
    Kinlin LM; Mittleman MA; Harris AD; Rubin MA; Fisman DN
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2010 Sep; 31(9):908-17. PubMed ID: 20658920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reducing needlestick injuries through safety-engineered devices: results of a Japanese multi-centre study.
    Fukuda H; Yamanaka N
    J Hosp Infect; 2016 Feb; 92(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 26601603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of implementing safety-engineered devices on percutaneous injury epidemiology.
    Sohn S; Eagan J; Sepkowitz KA; Zuccotti G
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2004 Jul; 25(7):536-42. PubMed ID: 15301024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How to evaluate sharp safety-engineered devices.
    Ford JL; Phillips P
    Nurs Times; 2008 Sep 9-15; 104(36):42-5. PubMed ID: 18822548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating sharps safety devices: meeting OSHA's intent. Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
    Pugliese G; Germanson TP; Bartley J; Luca J; Lamerato L; Cox J; Jagger J
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2001 Jul; 22(7):456-8. PubMed ID: 11583216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Needlestick prevention devices: data from hospital surveillance in Piedmont, Italy-comprehensive analysis on needlestick injuries between healthcare workers after the introduction of safety devices.
    Ottino MC; Argentero A; Argentero PA; Garzaro G; Zotti CM
    BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e030576. PubMed ID: 31748292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reducing needlesticks and blood exposure: tracking, training, technology.
    Hosp Secur Saf Manage; 1999 Mar; 19(11):5-10. PubMed ID: 10351477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of U.S. policies to protect healthcare workers from bloodborne pathogens: the critical role of safety-engineered devices.
    Jagger J; Perry J; Gomaa A; Phillips EK
    J Infect Public Health; 2008; 1(2):62-71. PubMed ID: 20701847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors Associated with Occupational Needle Stick and Sharps Injuries among Hospital Healthcare Workers in Bale Zone, Southeast Ethiopia.
    Bekele T; Gebremariam A; Kaso M; Ahmed K
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140382. PubMed ID: 26469776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A review of needle-protective devices to prevent sharps injuries.
    Trim JC
    Br J Nurs; 2004 Feb 12-25; 13(3):144, 146-53. PubMed ID: 14997076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of Safety-Engineered Devices on the Incidence of Occupational Blood and Body Fluid Exposures Among Healthcare Personnel in an Academic Facility, 2000-2014.
    Kanamori H; Weber DJ; DiBiase LM; Pitman KL; Consoli SA; Hill J; Sickbert-Bennett EE; Rutala WA
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2016 May; 37(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 26856246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of safety devices and the prevention of percutaneous injuries among healthcare workers.
    Valls V; Lozano MS; Yánez R; Martínez MJ; Pascual F; Lloret J; Ruiz JA
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 28(12):1352-60. PubMed ID: 17994515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Incidence of sharp and needle-stick injuries and mucocutaneous blood exposure among healthcare workers.
    Rapisarda V; Loreto C; Vitale E; Matera S; Ragusa R; Coco G; Rapisarda L; Ledda C
    Future Microbiol; 2019 Jun; 14():27-31. PubMed ID: 31187636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of a safety resheathable winged steel needle for prevention of percutaneous injuries associated with intravascular-access procedures among healthcare workers.
    Mendelson MH; Lin-Chen BY; Solomon R; Bailey E; Kogan G; Goldbold J
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2003 Feb; 24(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 12602692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of potential reduction in blood and body fluid exposures by use of alternative instruments.
    Waclawski ER
    Occup Med (Lond); 2004 Dec; 54(8):567-9. PubMed ID: 15576871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do safety engineered devices reduce needlestick injuries?
    Schuurmans J; Lutgens SP; Groen L; Schneeberger PM
    J Hosp Infect; 2018 Sep; 100(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 29738783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sharps injuries in UK health care: a review of injury rates, viral transmission and potential efficacy of safety devices.
    Elder A; Paterson C
    Occup Med (Lond); 2006 Dec; 56(8):566-74. PubMed ID: 17065314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sharp-device injuries to hospital staff nurses in 4 countries.
    Clarke SP; Schubert M; Körner T
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2007 Apr; 28(4):473-8. PubMed ID: 17385155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.