269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25345445)
1. A comparison of conventional compression plates and locking compression plates using cantilever bending in an ilial fracture model.
Bruce CW; Gibson TW; Runciman RJ
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2014; 27(6):430-5. PubMed ID: 25345445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A biomechanical comparison of conventional dynamic compression plates and string-of-pearls™ locking plates using cantilever bending in a canine Ilial fracture model.
Kenzig AR; Butler JR; Priddy LB; Lacy KR; Elder SH
BMC Vet Res; 2017 Jul; 13(1):222. PubMed ID: 28705189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the mechanical behaviors of semicontoured, locking plate-rod fixation and anatomically contoured, conventional plate-rod fixation applied to experimentally induced gap fractures in canine femora.
Goh CS; Santoni BG; Puttlitz CM; Palmer RH
Am J Vet Res; 2009 Jan; 70(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 19119945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro biomechanical comparison of a 4.5 mm narrow locking compression plate construct versus a 4.5 mm limited contact dynamic compression plate construct for arthrodesis of the equine proximal interphalangeal joint.
Ahern BJ; Showalter BL; Elliott DM; Richardson DW; Getman LM
Vet Surg; 2013 Apr; 42(3):335-9. PubMed ID: 23445267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro biomechanical comparison of 3.5 string of pearl plate fixation to 3.5 locking compression plate fixation in a canine fracture gap model.
Malenfant RC; Sod GA
Vet Surg; 2014 May; 43(4):465-70. PubMed ID: 24720361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ex vivo cyclic mechanical behaviour of 2.4 mm locking plates compared with 2.4 mm limited contact plates in a cadaveric diaphyseal gap model.
Irubetagoyena I; Verset M; Palierne S; Swider P; Autefage A
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2013; 26(6):479-88. PubMed ID: 24080774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical Comparison of Locking Compression Plate and Limited Contact Dynamic Compression Plate Combined with an Intramedullary Rod in a Canine Femoral Fracture-Gap Model.
Matres-Lorenzo L; Diop A; Maurel N; Boucton MC; Bernard F; Bernardé A
Vet Surg; 2016 Apr; 45(3):319-26. PubMed ID: 26909507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ex vivo biomechanical comparison of a 3.5 mm locking compression plate applied cranially and a 2.7 mm locking compression plate applied medially in a gap model of the distal aspect of the canine radius.
Uhl JM; Kapatkin AS; Garcia TC; Stover SM
Vet Surg; 2013 Oct; 42(7):840-6. PubMed ID: 24033354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A mechanical comparison of the locking compression plate (LCP) and the low contact-dynamic compression plate (DCP) in an osteoporotic bone model.
Snow M; Thompson G; Turner PG
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Feb; 22(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 18349780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A biomechanical comparison of 3.5 locking compression plate fixation to 3.5 limited contact dynamic compression plate fixation in a canine cadaveric distal humeral metaphyseal gap model.
Filipowicz D; Lanz O; McLaughlin R; Elder S; Werre S
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2009; 22(4):270-7. PubMed ID: 19597629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro biomechanical comparison of limited contat dynamic compression plate and locking compression plate.
Aguila AZ; Manos JM; Orlansky AS; Todhunter RJ; Trotter EJ; Van der Meulen MC
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2005; 18(4):220-6. PubMed ID: 16594390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can DCP and LCP plates generate more compression? The effect of multiple eccentrically placed screws and their drill positioning guides.
Ya'ish FM; Nanu AM; Cross AT
Injury; 2011 Oct; 42(10):1095-100. PubMed ID: 21450288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A mechanical comparison of equine proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis techniques: an axial locking compression plate and two abaxial transarticular cortical screws versus an axial dynamic compression plate and two abaxial transarticular cortical screws.
Sod GA; Riggs LM; Mitchell CF; Martin GS
Vet Surg; 2011 Jul; 40(5):571-8. PubMed ID: 21521241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical Properties of the 1.5 mm Locking Compression Plate: Comparison with the 1.5 and 2.0 mm Straight Plates in Compression and Torsion.
Watrous GK; Moens NMM; Runciman J; Gibson TWG
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2018 Nov; 31(6):438-444. PubMed ID: 30357797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical comparison of mono- and bicortical screws in an experimentally induced gap fracture.
Demner D; Garcia TC; Serdy MG; Hayashi K; Nir BA; Stover SM
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2014; 27(6):422-9. PubMed ID: 25327936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mechanical properties of 18 different AO bone plates and the clamp-rod internal fixation system tested on a gap model construct.
Zahn K; Frei R; Wunderle D; Linke B; Schwieger K; Guerguiev B; Pohler O; Matis U
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2008; 21(3):185-94. PubMed ID: 18536843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical testing of a hybrid locking plate fixation of equine sesamoid osteotomies.
Almeida da Silveira E; Levasseur A; Lacourt M; Elce Y; Petit Y
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2014; 27(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 24441589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro biomechanical evaluation and comparison of a new prototype locking plate and a limited-contact self compression plate for equine fracture repair.
Quinteros DD; García-López JM; Abuja GA; Tarkanian M; Maranda LS; Bubeck K; Kowaleski MP
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2012; 25(4):273-80. PubMed ID: 22695636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro biomechanical comparison of dynamic compression plates with a rough contact surface and a polished contact surface for fixation of osteotomized equine third metacarpal bones.
Sod GA; Riggs LM; Mitchell CF; Martin GS; Gill MS
Vet Surg; 2011 Jul; 40(5):579-85. PubMed ID: 21539578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical testing of locking and nonlocking plates in the canine scapula.
Acquaviva AE; Miller EI; Eisenmann DJ; Stone RT; Kraus KH
J Am Anim Hosp Assoc; 2012; 48(6):372-8. PubMed ID: 23033465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
