BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

387 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25345738)

  • 21. Finite-sample corrected generalized estimating equation of population average treatment effects in stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.
    Scott JM; deCamp A; Juraska M; Fay MP; Gilbert PB
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Apr; 26(2):583-597. PubMed ID: 25267551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of two bias-corrected covariance estimators for generalized estimating equations.
    Lu B; Preisser JS; Qaqish BF; Suchindran C; Bangdiwala SI; Wolfson M
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):935-41. PubMed ID: 17825023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of population-averaged and cluster-specific models for the analysis of cluster randomized trials with missing binary outcomes: a simulation study.
    Ma J; Raina P; Beyene J; Thabane L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Jan; 13():9. PubMed ID: 23343209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters: which analyses should be used?
    Leyrat C; Morgan KE; Leurent B; Kahan BC
    Int J Epidemiol; 2018 Feb; 47(1):321-331. PubMed ID: 29025158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sample size determination for GEE analyses of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.
    Li F; Turner EL; Preisser JS
    Biometrics; 2018 Dec; 74(4):1450-1458. PubMed ID: 29921006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. ORTH.Ord: An R package for analyzing correlated ordinal outcomes using alternating logistic regressions with orthogonalized residuals.
    Meng C; Ryan M; Rathouz PJ; Turner EL; Preisser JS; Li F
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Jul; 237():107567. PubMed ID: 37207384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sample size considerations for GEE analyses of three-level cluster randomized trials.
    Teerenstra S; Lu B; Preisser JS; van Achterberg T; Borm GF
    Biometrics; 2010 Dec; 66(4):1230-7. PubMed ID: 20070297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Optimal designs in three-level cluster randomized trials with a binary outcome.
    Liu J; Liu L; Colditz GA
    Stat Med; 2019 Sep; 38(20):3733-3746. PubMed ID: 31162709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bias-reduced and separation-proof GEE with small or sparse longitudinal binary data.
    Mondol MH; Rahman MS
    Stat Med; 2019 Jun; 38(14):2544-2560. PubMed ID: 30793784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Appropriate statistical methods for analysing partially nested randomised controlled trials with continuous outcomes: a simulation study.
    Candlish J; Teare MD; Dimairo M; Flight L; Mandefield L; Walters SJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):105. PubMed ID: 30314463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A general method for calculating power for GEE analysis of complete and incomplete stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.
    Zhang Y; Preisser JS; Turner EL; Rathouz PJ; Toles M; Li F
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Jan; 32(1):71-87. PubMed ID: 36253078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Developing appropriate methods for cost-effectiveness analysis of cluster randomized trials.
    Gomes M; Ng ES; Grieve R; Nixon R; Carpenter J; Thompson SG
    Med Decis Making; 2012; 32(2):350-61. PubMed ID: 22016450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Finite-sample adjustments in variance estimators for clustered competing risks regression.
    Chen X; Li F
    Stat Med; 2022 Jun; 41(14):2645-2664. PubMed ID: 35288959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Maintaining the validity of inference in small-sample stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes when using generalized estimating equations.
    Ford WP; Westgate PM
    Stat Med; 2020 Sep; 39(21):2779-2792. PubMed ID: 32578264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Leveraging baseline covariates to analyze small cluster-randomized trials with a rare binary outcome.
    Zhu AY; Mitra N; Hemming K; Harhay MO; Li F
    Biom J; 2024 Jan; 66(1):e2200135. PubMed ID: 37035941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of bias-corrected covariance estimators for MMRM analysis in longitudinal data with dropouts.
    Gosho M; Hirakawa A; Noma H; Maruo K; Sato Y
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2389-2406. PubMed ID: 26265765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Imputation strategies for missing binary outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
    Ma J; Akhtar-Danesh N; Dolovich L; Thabane L;
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Feb; 11():18. PubMed ID: 21324148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sample size considerations for stratified cluster randomization design with binary outcomes and varying cluster size.
    Xu X; Zhu H; Ahn C
    Stat Med; 2019 Aug; 38(18):3395-3404. PubMed ID: 31033011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. xtgeebcv: A command for bias-corrected sandwich variance estimation for GEE analyses of cluster randomized trials.
    Gallis JA; Li F; Turner EL
    Stata J; 2020 Jun; 20(2):363-381. PubMed ID: 35330784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Power considerations for generalized estimating equations analyses of four-level cluster randomized trials.
    Wang X; Turner EL; Preisser JS; Li F
    Biom J; 2022 Apr; 64(4):663-680. PubMed ID: 34897793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.