These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25345816)
1. Performance of two neutral oral contrast agents in CT enterography. Wong J; Roger M; Moore H J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2015 Feb; 59(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 25345816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. CT enterography: Mannitol versus VoLumen. Wong J; Moore H; Roger M; McKee C J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2016 Oct; 60(5):593-598. PubMed ID: 27469175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the performance of two neutral oral contrast agents in computed tomography enterography: A randomized controlled trial. Zheng MQ; Zeng QS; Yu YQ; Ji R; Li YY; Zhang MM; Sun YN; Li LX; Zuo XL; Yang XY; Li YQ J Dig Dis; 2020 Feb; 21(2):112-119. PubMed ID: 31825554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of bowel distension and bowel wall visualization according to patient positions during administration of oral contrast media for CT enterography. Lee SB; Kim SH; Son JH; Baik JY Br J Radiol; 2017 Dec; 90(1080):20170352. PubMed ID: 28972790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Comparative Study of Four Oral Contrast Agents for Small Bowel Distension with Computed Tomography Enterography. Leduc F; De A; Rebello R; Muhn N; Ioannidis G Can Assoc Radiol J; 2015 May; 66(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 25585562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of 3% sorbitol vs psyllium fibre as oral contrast agents in MR enterography. Saini S; Colak E; Anthwal S; Vlachou PA; Raikhlin A; Kirpalani A Br J Radiol; 2014 Oct; 87(1042):20140100. PubMed ID: 25062448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multi-detector CT enterography with iso-osmotic mannitol as oral contrast for detecting small bowel disease. Zhang LH; Zhang SZ; Hu HJ; Gao M; Zhang M; Cao Q; Zhang QW World J Gastroenterol; 2005 Apr; 11(15):2324-9. PubMed ID: 15818746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of 2 different protocols for ingestion of low-attenuating oral contrast agent for multidetector computed tomography of the abdomen. Meindl TM; Hagl E; Reiser MF; Mueller-Lisse UG J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(2):218-22. PubMed ID: 17414757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computed tomography of the bowel: a prospective comparison study between four techniques. Paparo F; Garlaschi A; Biscaldi E; Bacigalupo L; Cevasco L; Rollandi GA Eur J Radiol; 2013 Jan; 82(1):e1-e10. PubMed ID: 22999647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Oral distension methods for small bowel MRI: comparison of different agents to optimize bowel distension. Schmidt SA; Baumann JA; Stanescu-Siegmund N; Froehlich E; Brambs HJ; Juchems MS Acta Radiol; 2016 Dec; 57(12):1460-1467. PubMed ID: 26868172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of two small bowel distending agents for enterography in pediatric small bowel imaging. Kolbe AB; Haas LA; Bartlett DJ; Iyer VR; Thomas KB; Tung J; Fidler JL; Fletcher JG Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Oct; 44(10):3252-3262. PubMed ID: 31218388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Individualized small bowel preparation for computed tomography enterography: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Sun YN; Li YY; Zheng MQ; Liang YF; Ji R; Yang XX; Qu JY; Li Z; Zuo XL; Li YQ J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2024 Jun; 39(6):1008-1015. PubMed ID: 38326979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of neutral oral contrast agents for assessment of the small bowel at abdominal staging CT. Kaireit TF; Huisinga C; Peperhove M; Wacker F; Ringe KI PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0225160. PubMed ID: 31725763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Small bowel obstruction following computed tomography and magnetic resonance enterography using psyllium seed husk as an oral contrast agent. Chen YA; Cervini P; Kirpalani A; Vlachou PA; Grover SC; Colak E Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014; 28(7):391-5. PubMed ID: 25157531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Active Crohn disease: CT findings and interobserver agreement for enteric phase CT enterography. Booya F; Fletcher JG; Huprich JE; Barlow JM; Johnson CD; Fidler JL; Solem CA; Sandborn WJ; Loftus EV; Harmsen WS Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):787-95. PubMed ID: 17032911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of neutral oral contrast versus positive oral contrast medium in abdominal multidetector CT. Berther R; Patak MA; Eckhardt B; Erturk SM; Zollikofer CL Eur Radiol; 2008 Sep; 18(9):1902-9. PubMed ID: 18414870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of pineapple juice and mannitol as oral contrast agents for magnetic resonance enterography. Zulkifle AF; Siti Soraya AR; Hamzaini AH Med J Malaysia; 2023 Nov; 78(6):774-779. PubMed ID: 38031220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Two Neutral Oral Contrast Agents in Pediatric Patients: A Prospective Randomized Study. Dillman JR; Towbin AJ; Imbus R; Young J; Gates E; Trout AT Radiology; 2018 Jul; 288(1):245-251. PubMed ID: 29737955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of low-density neutral oral contrast material in PET/CT for tumor imaging: results of a randomized clinical trial. Otero HJ; Yap JT; Patak MA; Erturk SM; Israel DA; Johnston CJ; Sakellis C; Rybicki FJ; Van den Abbeele AD; Ros PR AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Aug; 193(2):326-32. PubMed ID: 19620427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]