123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25347247)
1. [A practical guide to perform a good peer review].
Rosenberg J
Ugeskr Laeger; 2014 Jan; 176(4A):V07130432. PubMed ID: 25347247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript.
Provenzale JM; Stanley RJ
J Nucl Med Technol; 2006 Jun; 34(2):92-9. PubMed ID: 16751587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Peer Review of a Manuscript Submission: A How-To Guide for Effective and Efficient Commentary.
Allen LA; Ho PM
Circ Heart Fail; 2017 Dec; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 29237709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Reviewing dermatology manuscripts and publications.
Nelson CA; Freeman SR; Dellavalle RP
Dermatol Clin; 2009 Apr; 27(2):201-4, viii. PubMed ID: 19254664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Guide for peer reviewers of scientific articles in the Croatian Medical Journal.
Marusić M; Sambunjak D; Marusić A
Croat Med J; 2005 Apr; 46(2):326-32. PubMed ID: 15849858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A review committee's guide for evaluating qualitative proposals.
Morse JM
Qual Health Res; 2003 Jul; 13(6):833-51. PubMed ID: 12891717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Critical review of a scientific manuscript: a practical guide for reviewers.
Falavigna A; Blauth M; Kates SL
J Neurosurg; 2018 Jan; 128(1):312-321. PubMed ID: 29053077
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. How to review scientific manuscripts and clinical case reports for Journal of Oral Implantology.
Rutkowski JL; Cairone JV
J Oral Implantol; 2009; 35(6):310-4. PubMed ID: 20017649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stewards of the discipline: The role of referees and peer review.
Broome ME
Nurs Outlook; 2010; 58(4):169-70. PubMed ID: 20637926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. On becoming a peer reviewer for a neuropsychology journal.
Duff K; O'Bryant SE; Westervelt HJ; Sweet JJ; Reynolds CR; van Gorp WG; Tranel D; McCaffrey RJ
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2009 May; 24(3):201-7. PubMed ID: 19640873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Peer review.
Twaij H; Oussedik S; Hoffmeyer P
Bone Joint J; 2014 Apr; 96-B(4):436-41. PubMed ID: 24692607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript.
Provenzale JM; Stanley RJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Oct; 185(4):848-54. PubMed ID: 16177399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How to critique qualitative research articles.
Forchuk C; Roberts J
Can J Nurs Res; 1993; 25(4):47-55; quiz 56. PubMed ID: 10603806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Peer review of manuscripts.
Ludbrook J
J Clin Neurosci; 2002 Mar; 9(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 11922694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The introduction of a performance-based system for funding research.
Smith T
Nurs Prax N Z; 2006 Mar; 22(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 17205666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. How to critique a research study.
Fosbinder D; Loveridge C
Adv Pract Nurs Q; 1996; 2(3):68-71. PubMed ID: 9447093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Guide for peer reviewers of scientific article].
Marusić M; Sambunjak D; Marusić A
Lijec Vjesn; 2005; 127(5-6):107-11. PubMed ID: 16281469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Consider the source.
Mason DJ
Am J Nurs; 2009 Apr; 109(4):7. PubMed ID: 19325281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Hitting the bull's eye rather than shooting yourself between the eyes.
Froman RD
Res Nurs Health; 2008 Oct; 31(5):399-401. PubMed ID: 18613067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Authors' Submission Toolkit: a practical guide to getting your research published.
Chipperfield L; Citrome L; Clark J; David FS; Enck R; Evangelista M; Gonzalez J; Groves T; Magrann J; Mansi B; Miller C; Mooney LA; Murphy A; Shelton J; Walson PD; Weigel A
Curr Med Res Opin; 2010 Aug; 26(8):1967-82. PubMed ID: 20569069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
