These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25347314)
1. The diffusion model is not a deterministic growth model: comment on Jones and Dzhafarov (2014). Smith PL; Ratcliff R; McKoon G Psychol Rev; 2014 Oct; 121(4):679-88. PubMed ID: 25347314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analyzability, ad hoc restrictions, and excessive flexibility of evidence-accumulation models: reply to two critical commentaries. Jones M; Dzhafarov EN Psychol Rev; 2014 Oct; 121(4):689-95. PubMed ID: 25347315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The falsifiability of actual decision-making models. Heathcote A; Wagenmakers EJ; Brown SD Psychol Rev; 2014 Oct; 121(4):676-8. PubMed ID: 25347313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sequential sampling models without random between-trial variability: the racing diffusion model of speeded decision making. Tillman G; Van Zandt T; Logan GD Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Oct; 27(5):911-936. PubMed ID: 32424622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Unfalsifiability and mutual translatability of major modeling schemes for choice reaction time. Jones M; Dzhafarov EN Psychol Rev; 2014 Jan; 121(1):1-32. PubMed ID: 24079307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reexamining the effects of speed-accuracy instructions with a diffusion-model-based analysis. Ratcliff R; McKoon G J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Nov; 49(11):1732-1751. PubMed ID: 37676126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modeling evidence accumulation decision processes using integral equations: Urgency-gating and collapsing boundaries. Smith PL; Ratcliff R Psychol Rev; 2022 Mar; 129(2):235-267. PubMed ID: 34410765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sequential Sampling Models in Cognitive Neuroscience: Advantages, Applications, and Extensions. Forstmann BU; Ratcliff R; Wagenmakers EJ Annu Rev Psychol; 2016; 67():641-66. PubMed ID: 26393872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modeling accuracy, response time, and bias in continuous orientation judgments. Kvam PD J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):301-318. PubMed ID: 30714760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Racing against the clock: Evidence-based versus time-based decisions. Hawkins GE; Heathcote A Psychol Rev; 2021 Mar; 128(2):222-263. PubMed ID: 33600202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Ratcliff R; McKoon G Neural Comput; 2008 Apr; 20(4):873-922. PubMed ID: 18085991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Double responding: A new constraint for models of speeded decision making. Evans NJ; Dutilh G; Wagenmakers EJ; van der Maas HLJ Cogn Psychol; 2020 Sep; 121():101292. PubMed ID: 32217348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Slow and steady: Training induced improvements to response time consistency are due to overall slowing and minimized extremely slow responses. Vasquez BP; Anderson ND Psychol Aging; 2018 Dec; 33(8):1181-1194. PubMed ID: 30475010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Background music changes the policy of human decision-making: Evidence from experimental and drift-diffusion model-based approaches on different decision tasks. Perez Santangelo A; Ludwig CJH; Navajas J; Sigman M; Leone MJ J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Sep; 151(9):2222-2236. PubMed ID: 35324240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Internal and external sources of variability in perceptual decision-making. Ratcliff R; Voskuilen C; McKoon G Psychol Rev; 2018 Jan; 125(1):33-46. PubMed ID: 29035076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modeling continuous outcome color decisions with the circular diffusion model: Metric and categorical properties. Smith PL; Saber S; Corbett EA; Lilburn SD Psychol Rev; 2020 Jul; 127(4):562-590. PubMed ID: 32150425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modeling 2-alternative forced-choice tasks: Accounting for both magnitude and difference effects. Ratcliff R; Voskuilen C; Teodorescu A Cogn Psychol; 2018 Jun; 103():1-22. PubMed ID: 29501775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]