444 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25347375)
1. Predictors of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy at a single institution: preoperative and pathologic factors, and the impact of surgeon variability and technique on incidence and location.
Lallas CD; Fashola Y; Den RB; Gelpi-Hammerschmidt F; Calvaresi AE; McCue P; Birbe R; Gomella LG; Trabulsi EJ
Can J Urol; 2014 Oct; 21(5):7479-86. PubMed ID: 25347375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
Ploussard G; Agamy MA; Alenda O; Allory Y; Mouracade P; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A; Salomon L
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The importance of surgical margins in prostate cancer.
Sooriakumaran P; Dev HS; Skarecky D; Ahlering T
J Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 113(3):310-5. PubMed ID: 27004601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome.
De La Roca RL; Da Cunha IW; Bezerra SM; Da Fonseca FP
Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 25010296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictive factors and oncological outcomes of persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen in patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Kumar A; Samavedi S; Mouraviev V; Bates AS; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR
J Robot Surg; 2017 Mar; 11(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 27245233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Site of positive surgical margins influences biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Godoy G; Tareen BU; Lepor H
BJU Int; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1610-4. PubMed ID: 19549257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk factors for biochemical recurrence after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon experience.
Tanimoto R; Fashola Y; Scotland KB; Calvaresi AE; Gomella LG; Trabulsi EJ; Lallas CD
BMC Urol; 2015 Apr; 15():27. PubMed ID: 25879548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Race and prostate weight as independent predictors for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Schroeck FR; Sun L; Freedland SJ; Jayachandran J; Robertson CN; Moul JW
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2008; 11(4):371-6. PubMed ID: 18427570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prostate carcinoma with positive margins at radical prostatectomy: role of tumour zonal origin in biochemical recurrence.
O'Neil LM; Walsh S; Cohen RJ; Lee S
BJU Int; 2015 Oct; 116 Suppl 3():42-8. PubMed ID: 26218868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of single positive surgical margin features on biochemical recurrence after robotic radical prostatectomy.
Evren I; Hacıislamoğlu A; Ekşi M; Yavuzsan AH; Baytekin F; Çolakoğlu Y; Canoğlu D; Tugcu V
Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 30325603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Number of positive preoperative biopsy cores is a predictor of positive surgical margins (PSM) in small prostates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
Tuliao PH; Koo KC; Komninos C; Chang CH; Choi YD; Chung BH; Hong SJ; Rha KH
BJU Int; 2015 Dec; 116(6):897-904. PubMed ID: 25098818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk factors for biochemical recurrence following radical perineal prostatectomy in a large contemporary series: a detailed assessment of margin extent and location.
Sammon JD; Trinh QD; Sukumar S; Ravi P; Friedman A; Sun M; Schmitges J; Jeldres C; Jeong W; Mander N; Peabody JO; Karakiewicz PI; Harris M
Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1470-6. PubMed ID: 22534086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on biochemical or clinical progression?
Pfitzenmaier J; Pahernik S; Tremmel T; Haferkamp A; Buse S; Hohenfellner M
BJU Int; 2008 Nov; 102(10):1413-8. PubMed ID: 18537951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Apical surgical margins status in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy does not depend on disease characteristics.
Tsivian M; Zilberman DE; Ferrandino MN; Madden JF; Mouraviev V; Albala DM
J Endourol; 2012 Apr; 26(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 22192106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic factors identifying biochemical recurrence in patients with positive margins after radical prostatectomy.
Anastasiou I; Tyritzis SI; Adamakis I; Mitropoulos D; Stravodimos KG; Katafigiotis I; Balangas A; Kollias A; Pavlakis K; Constantinides CA
Int Urol Nephrol; 2011 Sep; 43(3):715-20. PubMed ID: 21053071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of positive surgical margin rates in high risk prostate cancer: open versus minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.
Harty NJ; Kozinn SI; Canes D; Sorcini A; Moinzadeh A
Int Braz J Urol; 2013; 39(5):639-46; discussion 647-8. PubMed ID: 24267107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognostic significance of perineural invasion in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.
Dell'Atti L
J BUON; 2016; 21(5):1219-1223. PubMed ID: 27837626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Identification of factors predicting response to adjuvant radiation therapy in patients with positive margins after radical prostatectomy.
Kamat AM; Babaian K; Cheung MR; Naya Y; Huang SH; Kuban D; Babaian RJ
J Urol; 2003 Nov; 170(5):1860-3. PubMed ID: 14532793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of surgical margin status on prostate-cancer-specific mortality.
Chalfin HJ; Dinizo M; Trock BJ; Feng Z; Partin AW; Walsh PC; Humphreys E; Han M
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1684-9. PubMed ID: 22788795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
