These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2534806)

  • 1. Evaluation of a glass ionomer cement and a microfilled composite resin in the treatment of root surface caries.
    Levy SM; Jenson ME; Doering JV; Sheth JJ
    Gen Dent; 1989; 37(6):468-72. PubMed ID: 2534806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A clinical comparison of a glass ionomer cement and a microfilled composite resin in restoring root caries: two-year results.
    Kaurich M; Kawakami K; Perez P; Munn T; Hasse AL; Garrett NR
    Gen Dent; 1991; 39(5):346-9. PubMed ID: 1839833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations.
    Powell LV; Johnson GH; Gordon GE
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8700767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical evaluation of direct esthetic restorations in cervical abrasion/erosion lesions: one-year results.
    Powell LV; Gordon GE; Johnson GH
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Sep; 22(9):687-92. PubMed ID: 1835107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The clinical evaluation of glass ionomer cements and microfilled composite resins in the treatment of cervical lesions of the teeth (confirmed with scanning electron microscopy).
    Shahani DR; Kolwalkar NS
    J Indian Dent Assoc; 1986 Jan; 58(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 3457864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dentin bonding, caries control.
    Swift EJ
    J Esthet Dent; 2000; 12(5):236-7. PubMed ID: 11338489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in the treatment of cervical caries in xerostomic head and neck radiation patients.
    McComb D; Erickson RL; Maxymiw WG; Wood RE
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 12216559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.
    Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hinkel R
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 3-year clinical evaluation of glass ionomer cements as Class III restorations.
    Osborne JW; Berry TG
    Am J Dent; 1990 Apr; 3(2):40-3. PubMed ID: 2150170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of various surface coatings on fluoride release from glass-ionomer cement.
    Castro GW; Gray SE; Buikema DJ; Reagan SE
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(5):194-8. PubMed ID: 8700760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fluoride release and caries inhibition associated with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement at varying fluoride loading doses.
    Donly KJ; Segura A
    Am J Dent; 2002 Feb; 15(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 12074234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical evaluation of five adhesive systems.
    Tyas MJ
    Am J Dent; 1994 Apr; 7(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 8054189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Treatment of root surface caries--a literature survey].
    van Pelt AW; Saathof JN; van der Veen JH; van de Poel AC
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1988 Aug; 95(8):285-92. PubMed ID: 3077803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite in Class III restorations.
    van Dijken JW
    Am J Dent; 1996 Oct; 9(5):195-8. PubMed ID: 9545903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contemporary treatment strategies for root surface dental caries.
    Billings RJ; Brown LR; Kaster AG
    Gerodontics; 1985 Feb; 1(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 3858185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Volumetric microleakage assessment of glass-ionomer-resin composite hybrid materials.
    de Magalhães CS; Serra MC; Rodrigues Júnior AL
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Feb; 30(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 10356563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of a dentinal adhesive system: three-year results.
    Duke ES; Robbins JW; Snyder DS
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Nov; 22(11):889-95. PubMed ID: 1839860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fluid flow after resin-composite restoration in extracted carious teeth.
    Banomyong D; Palamara JE; Messer HH; Burrow MF
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 19583764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Composite resin and glass-ionomer cement: current status for use in cervical restorations.
    Brackett WW; Robinson PB
    Quintessence Int; 1990 Jun; 21(6):445-7. PubMed ID: 2243948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.
    Ermiş RB
    Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.