These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25348628)
1. Clinical trials registries are under-utilized in the conduct of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional analysis. Jones CW; Keil LG; Weaver MA; Platts-Mills TF Syst Rev; 2014 Oct; 3():126. PubMed ID: 25348628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical trial registry use in anaesthesiology systematic reviews: A cross-sectional study of systematic reviews published in anaesthesiology journals and the Cochrane Library. Umberham BA; Detweiler BN; Sims MT; Vassar M Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2017 Dec; 34(12):797-807. PubMed ID: 28731924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Systematic Reviews Published in Emergency Medicine Journals Do Not Routinely Search Clinical Trials Registries: A Cross-Sectional Analysis. Keil LG; Platts-Mills TF; Jones CW Ann Emerg Med; 2015 Oct; 66(4):424-427.e2. PubMed ID: 25447560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Trial Registry Use in Surgery Systematic Reviews: A Cross-Sectional Study. Gray HM; Simpson A; Bowers A; Johnson AL; Vassar M J Surg Res; 2020 Mar; 247():323-331. PubMed ID: 31708197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future? Lefebvre C; Glanville J; Wieland LS; Coles B; Weightman AL Syst Rev; 2013 Sep; 2():78. PubMed ID: 24066664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The future of Cochrane Neonatal. Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical Trial Registry Use in Orthopaedic Surgery Systematic Reviews. Reddy AK; Anderson JM; Gray HM; Fishbeck K; Vassar M J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2021 May; 103(10):e41. PubMed ID: 33983151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Infrequent use of clinical trials registries in published systematic reviews in urology. Aro T; Koo K; Matlaga BR World J Urol; 2020 May; 38(5):1335-1340. PubMed ID: 31444605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical trial registry searches are under-utilized in systematic reviews from critical care journals: A bibliometric analysis. Greiner B; Corcoran A; Wheeler D J Crit Care; 2021 Jun; 63():175-178. PubMed ID: 33012585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical trials registries are underused in the pregnancy and childbirth literature: a systematic review of the top 20 journals. Yerokhin VV; Carr BK; Sneed G; Vassar M BMC Res Notes; 2016 Oct; 9(1):475. PubMed ID: 27769265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Trial Registry Searches in Plastic Surgery Systematic Reviews: A Meta-epidemiological Study. Hughes GK; Garrett EP; Staggs JD; Reddy AK; Wiebe JE; Vassar M J Surg Res; 2023 Aug; 288():21-27. PubMed ID: 36948029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Systematic Reviewers in Clinical Neurology Do Not Routinely Search Clinical Trials Registries. Sinnett PM; Carr B; Cook G; Mucklerath H; Varney L; Weiher M; Yerokhin V; Vassar M PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0134596. PubMed ID: 26225564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Searching ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform to inform systematic reviews: what are the optimal search approaches? Glanville JM; Duffy S; McCool R; Varley D J Med Libr Assoc; 2014 Jul; 102(3):177-83. PubMed ID: 25031558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry. Borah R; Brown AW; Capers PL; Kaiser KA BMJ Open; 2017 Feb; 7(2):e012545. PubMed ID: 28242767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of searching clinical trial registries in systematic reviews of pharmaceutical treatments: methodological systematic review and reanalysis of meta-analyses. Baudard M; Yavchitz A; Ravaud P; Perrodeau E; Boutron I BMJ; 2017 Feb; 356():j448. PubMed ID: 28213479 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Utilization of Clinical Trials Registries in Obstetrics and Gynecology Systematic Reviews. Bibens ME; Chong AB; Vassar M Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):248-53. PubMed ID: 26942350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How do authors of systematic reviews deal with research malpractice and misconduct in original studies? A cross-sectional analysis of systematic reviews and survey of their authors. Elia N; von Elm E; Chatagner A; Pöpping DM; Tramèr MR BMJ Open; 2016 Mar; 6(3):e010442. PubMed ID: 26936908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical trial registry use in minimally invasive surgical oncology systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Fuller K; Bowers A; Vassar M BMJ Evid Based Med; 2020 Apr; 25(2):1-2. PubMed ID: 31427352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Handsearching versus electronic searching to identify reports of randomized trials. Hopewell S; Clarke M; Lefebvre C; Scherer R Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Apr; 2007(2):MR000001. PubMed ID: 17443625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does information from ClinicalTrials.gov increase transparency and reduce bias? Results from a five-report case series. Adam GP; Springs S; Trikalinos T; Williams JW; Eaton JL; Von Isenburg M; Gierisch JM; Wilson LM; Robinson KA; Viswanathan M; Middleton JC; Forman-Hoffman VL; Berliner E; Kaplan RM Syst Rev; 2018 Apr; 7(1):59. PubMed ID: 29661214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]