These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25349892)
1. Assimilation theory, attention, and asymmetry in Müller-Lyer illusions: quantitative predictions. Pressey AW Percept Mot Skills; 2014 Oct; 119(2):509-29. PubMed ID: 25349892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Note on the ontogeny of assimilative illusions: a reply to Pressey (1987). Jaeger T Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Aug; 79(1 Pt 2):531-5. PubMed ID: 7808892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assimilation theory, attentive fields, and the Müller-Lyer illusion. Bross M; Blair R; Longtin P Perception; 1978; 7(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 693229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of method, orientation, and size of angle on the Ponzo illusion. Kincade S; Wilson AE Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Dec; 91(3 Pt 1):837-47. PubMed ID: 11153859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Size and direction of distortion in geometric-optical illusions: conciliation between the Müller-Lyer and Titchener configurations. Nemati F Perception; 2009; 38(11):1585-600. PubMed ID: 20120258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Examination of Pressey's assimilation theory of the Poggendorff illusion. Hill AL Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Feb; 38(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 4815506 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Signal-detection analysis of the Müller-Lyer and the Horizontal-Vertical illusions. Brosvic GM; Civale NA; Long P; Kieley D; Kristoff K; Memblatt N; Gordon R; Parris L; Giambelluca C; Dihoff RE Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Dec; 79(3 Pt 1):1299-304. PubMed ID: 7899013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of varying fins in Müller-Lyer and Holding illusions. Pressey A; Martin NS Psychol Res; 1990; 52(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 2377725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Illusions within an Illusion. Deręgowski JB Perception; 2015 Dec; 44(12):1416-21. PubMed ID: 26562856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The reversed Müller-Lyer illusion and figure-ground organization theory. Taya R; Ohashi Y Perception; 1992; 21(5):611-26. PubMed ID: 1488264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of gap size between shaft and fins and of angle of fins on the Müller--Lyer illusion. Pressey AW; Di Lollo V; Tait RW Perception; 1977; 6(4):435-9. PubMed ID: 917731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Illusional effects of spatial distance between focal and contextual parts of a modified Müller-Lyer figure. Kolbert J; Sarris V Percept Mot Skills; 1984 Aug; 59(1):88-90. PubMed ID: 6493957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mathematical model for assimilation and contrast in perception of extent. Brigner WL Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Aug; 45(1):103-18. PubMed ID: 905070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of the Müller-Lyer illusion on map reading. Gillan DJ; Schmidt W; Hanowski RJ Percept Psychophys; 1999 Aug; 61(6):1154-67. PubMed ID: 10497434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Attentive fields are related to focal and contextual features: a study of Müller-Lyer distortions. Pressey AW; Pressey CA Percept Psychophys; 1992 May; 51(5):423-36. PubMed ID: 1594432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Attention and the Müller-Lyer illusion: simulation of an experiment by Larsen and Garn. Pressey AW; Kersten B Percept Mot Skills; 1989 Jun; 68(3 Pt 2):1323-9. PubMed ID: 2762095 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Inaccurate feedback and performance on the Müller-Lyer illusion. Brosvic GM; Finizio S Percept Mot Skills; 1995 Jun; 80(3 Pt 1):896-8. PubMed ID: 7567409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The two illusions of Müller-Lyer: confusion theory reexamined. Sekuler R; Erlebacher A Am J Psychol; 1971 Dec; 84(4):477-86. PubMed ID: 5142060 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]