153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25349982)
1. Experimentally validated pencil beam scanning source model in TOPAS.
Lin L; Kang M; Solberg TD; Ainsley CG; McDonough JE
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Nov; 59(22):6859-73. PubMed ID: 25349982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A benchmarking method to evaluate the accuracy of a commercial proton monte carlo pencil beam scanning treatment planning system.
Lin L; Huang S; Kang M; Hiltunen P; Vanderstraeten R; Lindberg J; Siljamaki S; Wareing T; Davis I; Barnett A; McGhee J; Simone CB; Solberg TD; McDonough JE; Ainsley C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):44-49. PubMed ID: 28300385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Benchmarking a GATE/Geant4 Monte Carlo model for proton beams in magnetic fields.
Padilla-Cabal F; Alejandro Fragoso J; Franz Resch A; Georg D; Fuchs H
Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 47(1):223-233. PubMed ID: 31661559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Experimental validation of the TOPAS Monte Carlo system for passive scattering proton therapy.
Testa M; Schümann J; Lu HM; Shin J; Faddegon B; Perl J; Paganetti H
Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 40(12):121719. PubMed ID: 24320505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development and validation of the Dynamic Collimation Monte Carlo simulation package for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Nelson NP; Culberson WS; Hyer DE; Geoghegan TJ; Patwardhan KA; Smith BR; Flynn RT; Yu J; Rana S; Gutiérrez AN; Hill PM
Med Phys; 2021 Jun; 48(6):3172-3185. PubMed ID: 33740253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Single pencil beam benchmark of a module for Monte Carlo simulation of proton transport in the PENELOPE code.
Verbeek N; Wulff J; Bäumer C; Smyczek S; Timmermann B; Brualla L
Med Phys; 2021 Jan; 48(1):456-476. PubMed ID: 33217026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An MCNPX Monte Carlo model of a discrete spot scanning proton beam therapy nozzle.
Sawakuchi GO; Mirkovic D; Perles LA; Sahoo N; Zhu XR; Ciangaru G; Suzuki K; Gillin MT; Mohan R; Titt U
Med Phys; 2010 Sep; 37(9):4960-70. PubMed ID: 20964215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Determination of surface dose in pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Kern A; Bäumer C; Kröninger K; Mertens L; Timmermann B; Walbersloh J; Wulff J
Med Phys; 2020 Jun; 47(5):2277-2288. PubMed ID: 32037577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An analytical dose-averaged LET calculation algorithm considering the off-axis LET enhancement by secondary protons for spot-scanning proton therapy.
Hirayama S; Matsuura T; Ueda H; Fujii Y; Fujii T; Takao S; Miyamoto N; Shimizu S; Fujimoto R; Umegaki K; Shirato H
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3404-3416. PubMed ID: 29788552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dosimetric commissioning and quality assurance of scanned ion beams at the Italian National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy.
Mirandola A; Molinelli S; Vilches Freixas G; Mairani A; Gallio E; Panizza D; Russo S; Ciocca M; Donetti M; Magro G; Giordanengo S; Orecchia R
Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5287-300. PubMed ID: 26328978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dual ring multilayer ionization chamber and theory-based correction technique for scanning proton therapy.
Takayanagi T; Nihongi H; Nishiuchi H; Tadokoro M; Ito Y; Nakashima C; Fujitaka S; Umezawa M; Matsuda K; Sakae T; Terunuma T
Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 43(7):4150. PubMed ID: 27370135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A pencil beam algorithm for magnetic resonance image-guided proton therapy.
Padilla-Cabal F; Georg D; Fuchs H
Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):2195-2204. PubMed ID: 29532490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetric evaluation of a commercial proton spot scanning Monte-Carlo dose algorithm: comparisons against measurements and simulations.
Saini J; Maes D; Egan A; Bowen SR; St James S; Janson M; Wong T; Bloch C
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7659-7681. PubMed ID: 28749373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Imaging of prompt gamma rays emitted during delivery of clinical proton beams with a Compton camera: feasibility studies for range verification.
Polf JC; Avery S; Mackin DS; Beddar S
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Sep; 60(18):7085-99. PubMed ID: 26317610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Experimental and Monte Carlo studies of fluence corrections for graphite calorimetry in low- and high-energy clinical proton beams.
Lourenço A; Thomas R; Bouchard H; Kacperek A; Vondracek V; Royle G; Palmans H
Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 43(7):4122. PubMed ID: 27370132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Independent dose verification system with Monte Carlo simulations using TOPAS for passive scattering proton therapy at the National Cancer Center in Korea.
Shin WG; Testa M; Kim HS; Jeong JH; Lee SB; Kim YJ; Min CH
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7598-7616. PubMed ID: 28809759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the influence of double and triple Gaussian proton kernel models on accuracy of dose calculations for spot scanning technique.
Hirayama S; Takayanagi T; Fujii Y; Fujimoto R; Fujitaka S; Umezawa M; Nagamine Y; Hosaka M; Yasui K; Omachi C; Toshito T
Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1437-50. PubMed ID: 26936728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Design of a focused collimator for proton therapy spot scanning using Monte Carlo methods.
Geoghegan TJ; Nelson NP; Flynn RT; Hill PM; Rana S; Hyer DE
Med Phys; 2020 Jul; 47(7):2725-2734. PubMed ID: 32170750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of electromagnetic and nuclear scattering models in GATE/Geant4 for proton therapy.
Resch AF; Elia A; Fuchs H; Carlino A; Palmans H; Stock M; Georg D; Grevillot L
Med Phys; 2019 May; 46(5):2444-2456. PubMed ID: 30870583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of nuclear models in Geant4 using the dose distribution of a 177 MeV proton pencil beam.
Hall DC; Makarova A; Paganetti H; Gottschalk B
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jan; 61(1):N1-N10. PubMed ID: 26611861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
