These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25350557)

  • 1. Trap array configuration influences estimates and precision of black bear density and abundance.
    Wilton CM; Puckett EE; Beringer J; Gardner B; Eggert LS; Belant JL
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e111257. PubMed ID: 25350557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Precision and bias of spatial capture-recapture estimates: A multi-site, multi-year Utah black bear case study.
    Schmidt GM; Graves TA; Pederson JC; Carroll SL
    Ecol Appl; 2022 Jul; 32(5):e2618. PubMed ID: 35368131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trap configuration and spacing influences parameter estimates in spatial capture-recapture models.
    Sun CC; Fuller AK; Royle JA
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e88025. PubMed ID: 24505361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hierarchical models for estimating density from DNA mark-recapture studies.
    Gardner B; Royle JA; Wegan MT
    Ecology; 2009 Apr; 90(4):1106-15. PubMed ID: 19449704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How does spatial study design influence density estimates from spatial capture-recapture models?
    Sollmann R; Gardner B; Belant JL
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(4):e34575. PubMed ID: 22539949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Explaining detection heterogeneity with finite mixture and non-Euclidean movement in spatially explicit capture-recapture models.
    Marrotte RR; Howe EJ; Beauclerc KB; Potter D; Northrup JM
    PeerJ; 2022; 10():e13490. PubMed ID: 35694380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating density-weighted connectivity of black bears (Ursus americanus) in Glacier National Park with spatial capture-recapture models.
    Carroll SL; Schmidt GM; Waller JS; Graves TA
    Mov Ecol; 2024 Jan; 12(1):8. PubMed ID: 38263096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating animal abundance at multiple scales by spatially explicit capture-recapture.
    Howe EJ; Potter D; Beauclerc KB; Jackson KE; Northrup JM
    Ecol Appl; 2022 Oct; 32(7):e2638. PubMed ID: 35441452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating and integrating spatial capture-recapture models with data of variable individual identifiability.
    Ruprecht JS; Eriksson CE; Forrester TD; Clark DA; Wisdom MJ; Rowland MM; Johnson BK; Levi T
    Ecol Appl; 2021 Oct; 31(7):e02405. PubMed ID: 34245619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modeling spatiotemporal abundance and movement dynamics using an integrated spatial capture-recapture movement model.
    Hostetter NJ; Regehr EV; Wilson RR; Royle JA; Converse SJ
    Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3772. PubMed ID: 35633152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Grizzly Bear Noninvasive Genetic Tagging Surveys: Estimating the Magnitude of Missed Detections.
    Fisher JT; Heim N; Code S; Paczkowski J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0161055. PubMed ID: 27603134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Comparison of Grizzly Bear Demographic Parameters Estimated from Non-Spatial and Spatial Open Population Capture-Recapture Models.
    Whittington J; Sawaya MA
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0134446. PubMed ID: 26230262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consequences of severe habitat fragmentation on density, genetics, and spatial capture-recapture analysis of a small bear population.
    Murphy SM; Augustine BC; Ulrey WA; Guthrie JM; Scheick BK; McCown JW; Cox JJ
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181849. PubMed ID: 28738077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using spatial mark-recapture for conservation monitoring of grizzly bear populations in Alberta.
    Boulanger J; Nielsen SE; Stenhouse GB
    Sci Rep; 2018 Mar; 8(1):5204. PubMed ID: 29581471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Incorporating citizen science data in spatially explicit integrated population models.
    Sun CC; Royle JA; Fuller AK
    Ecology; 2019 Sep; 100(9):e02777. PubMed ID: 31168779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A hierarchical model for estimating the spatial distribution and abundance of animals detected by continuous-time recorders.
    Dorazio RM; Karanth KU
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0176966. PubMed ID: 28520796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing small-mammal trapping design using spatially explicit capture recapture (SECR) modeling on long-term monitoring data.
    Freeman CM; Barthman-Thompson L; Klinger R; Woo I; Thorne KM
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(7):e0270082. PubMed ID: 35788575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimating grizzly and black bear population abundance and trend in Banff National Park using noninvasive genetic sampling.
    Sawaya MA; Stetz JB; Clevenger AP; Gibeau ML; Kalinowski ST
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e34777. PubMed ID: 22567089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatially explicit capture recapture density estimates: Robustness, accuracy and precision in a long-term study of jaguars (Panthera onca).
    Harmsen BJ; Foster RJ; Quigley H
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0227468. PubMed ID: 32511240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Demographic connectivity for ursid populations at wildlife crossing structures in Banff National Park.
    Sawaya MA; Clevenger AP; Kalinowski ST
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Aug; 27(4):721-30. PubMed ID: 23758532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.