329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25350693)
1. Extended template-based modeling and evaluation method using consensus of binding mode of GPCRs for virtual screening.
Sato M; Hirokawa T
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Nov; 54(11):3153-61. PubMed ID: 25350693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. From heptahelical bundle to hits from the Haystack: structure-based virtual screening for GPCR ligands.
Kooistra AJ; Roumen L; Leurs R; de Esch IJ; de Graaf C
Methods Enzymol; 2013; 522():279-336. PubMed ID: 23374191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Docking and Virtual Screening Strategies for GPCR Drug Discovery.
Beuming T; Lenselink B; Pala D; McRobb F; Repasky M; Sherman W
Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1335():251-76. PubMed ID: 26260606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Homology model-based virtual screening for GPCR ligands using docking and target-biased scoring.
Radestock S; Weil T; Renner S
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):1104-17. PubMed ID: 18442221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sequence-derived three-dimensional pharmacophore models for G-protein-coupled receptors and their application in virtual screening.
Klabunde T; Giegerich C; Evers A
J Med Chem; 2009 May; 52(9):2923-32. PubMed ID: 19374402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Function-specific virtual screening for GPCR ligands using a combined scoring method.
Kooistra AJ; Vischer HF; McNaught-Flores D; Leurs R; de Esch IJ; de Graaf C
Sci Rep; 2016 Jun; 6():28288. PubMed ID: 27339552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. From three-dimensional GPCR structure to rational ligand discovery.
Kooistra AJ; Leurs R; de Esch IJ; de Graaf C
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2014; 796():129-57. PubMed ID: 24158804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ligand-steered modeling and docking: A benchmarking study in class A G-protein-coupled receptors.
Phatak SS; Gatica EA; Cavasotto CN
J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Dec; 50(12):2119-28. PubMed ID: 21080692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Finding ligands for G protein-coupled receptors based on the protein-compound affinity matrix.
Fukunishi Y; Kubota S; Nakamura H
J Mol Graph Model; 2007 Jan; 25(5):633-43. PubMed ID: 16777448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ligand-optimized homology models of D₁ and D₂ dopamine receptors: application for virtual screening.
Kołaczkowski M; Bucki A; Feder M; Pawłowski M
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Mar; 53(3):638-48. PubMed ID: 23398329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An unbiased method to build benchmarking sets for ligand-based virtual screening and its application to GPCRs.
Xia J; Jin H; Liu Z; Zhang L; Wang XS
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 May; 54(5):1433-50. PubMed ID: 24749745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Virtual screening of biogenic amine-binding G-protein coupled receptors: comparative evaluation of protein- and ligand-based virtual screening protocols.
Evers A; Hessler G; Matter H; Klabunde T
J Med Chem; 2005 Aug; 48(17):5448-65. PubMed ID: 16107144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Combinatorial Consensus Scoring for Ligand-Based Virtual Fragment Screening: A Comparative Case Study for Serotonin 5-HT(3)A, Histamine H(1), and Histamine H(4) Receptors.
Schultes S; Kooistra AJ; Vischer HF; Nijmeijer S; Haaksma EE; Leurs R; de Esch IJ; de Graaf C
J Chem Inf Model; 2015 May; 55(5):1030-44. PubMed ID: 25815783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing GPCR homology models constructed from templates of various transmembrane sequence identities: Binding mode prediction and docking enrichment.
Loo JSE; Emtage AL; Ng KW; Yong ASJ; Doughty SW
J Mol Graph Model; 2018 Mar; 80():38-47. PubMed ID: 29306746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Current assessment of docking into GPCR crystal structures and homology models: successes, challenges, and guidelines.
Beuming T; Sherman W
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Dec; 52(12):3263-77. PubMed ID: 23121495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Selection of in silico drug screening results for G-protein-coupled receptors by using universal active probes.
Wada M; Kanamori E; Nakamura H; Fukunishi Y
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Sep; 51(9):2398-407. PubMed ID: 21848279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of virtual screening against GPCR homology models: Impact of template selection and treatment of binding site plasticity.
Jaiteh M; Rodríguez-Espigares I; Selent J; Carlsson J
PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Mar; 16(3):e1007680. PubMed ID: 32168319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and application of hybrid structure based method for efficient screening of ligands binding to G-protein coupled receptors.
Kortagere S; Welsh WJ
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2006 Dec; 20(12):789-802. PubMed ID: 17054015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving virtual screening of G protein-coupled receptors via ligand-directed modeling.
Coudrat T; Simms J; Christopoulos A; Wootten D; Sexton PM
PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Nov; 13(11):e1005819. PubMed ID: 29131821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An efficient multistep ligand-based virtual screening approach for GPR40 agonists.
Yao S; Lu T; Zhou Z; Liu H; Yuan H; Ran T; Lu S; Zhang Y; Ke Z; Xu J; Xiong X; Chen Y
Mol Divers; 2014 Feb; 18(1):183-93. PubMed ID: 24307222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
