180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25351173)
1. Comparing CTVs for permanent prostate brachytherapy.
Oton CA; Blanco L; Oton LF; Moral S
Clin Transl Oncol; 2015 May; 17(5):393-7. PubMed ID: 25351173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dosimetric comparison between treatment plans of patients treated with low-dose-rate vs. high-dose-rate interstitial prostate brachytherapy as monotherapy: Initial findings of a randomized clinical trial.
Major T; Polgár C; Jorgo K; Stelczer G; Ágoston P
Brachytherapy; 2017; 16(3):608-615. PubMed ID: 28325472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of planning margin on dosimetric quality in 131Cs permanent prostate brachytherapy.
Li T; Fountain BL; Duffy EW
Brachytherapy; 2010; 9(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 19853535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Re-distribution of brachytherapy dose using a differential dose prescription adapted to risk of local failure in low-risk prostate cancer patients.
Rylander S; Polders D; Steggerda MJ; Moonen LM; Tanderup K; Van der Heide UA
Radiother Oncol; 2015 Jun; 115(3):308-13. PubMed ID: 26091576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dosimetric evaluation of clinical target volume in the postimplant analysis of low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer.
Nasser NJ; Sappiatzer J; Wang Y; Borg J; Saibishkumar EP
Brachytherapy; 2015; 14(2):189-96. PubMed ID: 25301338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. High-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy consistently results in high quality dosimetry.
White EC; Kamrava MR; Demarco J; Park SJ; Wang PC; Kayode O; Steinberg ML; Demanes DJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Feb; 85(2):543-8. PubMed ID: 22652111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dosimetry Modeling for Focal Low-Dose-Rate Prostate Brachytherapy.
Al-Qaisieh B; Mason J; Bownes P; Henry A; Dickinson L; Ahmed HU; Emberton M; Langley S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jul; 92(4):787-93. PubMed ID: 25936808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a comparison of four consensus guidelines and dosimetric evaluation of 3D-CRT versus tomotherapy IMRT.
Malone S; Croke J; Roustan-Delatour N; Belanger E; Avruch L; Malone C; Morash C; Kayser C; Underhill K; Li Y; Malone K; Nyiri B; Spaans J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Nov; 84(3):725-32. PubMed ID: 22444999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy, high-dose rate brachytherapy, and low-dose rate permanent seeds implant for localized prostate cancer.
Yang R; Zhao N; Liao A; Wang H; Qu A
Med Dosim; 2016; 41(3):236-41. PubMed ID: 27400663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of source batch S dispersion on dosimetry for prostate cancer treatment with permanent implants.
Nuñez-Cumplido E; Perez-Calatayud J; Casares-Magaz O; Hernandez-Armas J
Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4933-40. PubMed ID: 26233219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Loose versus stranded seeds in permanent prostate brachytherapy: dosimetric comparison of intraoperative plans.
Major T; Agoston P; Fröhlich G; Baricza K; Szabo Z; Jorgo K; Herein A; Polgar C
Phys Med; 2014 Dec; 30(8):909-13. PubMed ID: 25175151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On the determination of an effective planning volume for permanent prostate implants.
Lee EK; Zaider M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Mar; 49(4):1197-206. PubMed ID: 11240263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 192Ir or 125I prostate brachytherapy as a boost to external beam radiotherapy in locally advanced prostatic cancer: a dosimetric point of view.
Nickers P; Thissen B; Jansen N; Deneufbourg JM
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Jan; 78(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 16216365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Treatment technique evolution and dosimetry trends over seven years of low dose rate prostate brachytherapy at an Australian institution.
Rutten TP; Lawson JM; Marcu LG
Phys Med; 2013 Nov; 29(6):662-9. PubMed ID: 22975428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Brachytherapy for prostate carcinoma].
Yorozu A
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2005 Apr; 65(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 15920966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of treatment planning techniques for low-dose-rate (LDR) prostate brachytherapy.
Connolly D; Sands G; Winter H; Foley MJ; Kleefeld C
Brachytherapy; 2021; 20(2):410-419. PubMed ID: 33234407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A detailed examination of the difference between planned and treated margins in 125I permanent prostate brachytherapy.
Patel AB; Waterman FM; Dicker AP
Brachytherapy; 2003; 2(4):223-8. PubMed ID: 15062130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) recommendations for transperineal permanent brachytherapy of prostate cancer.
Nag S; Beyer D; Friedland J; Grimm P; Nath R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Jul; 44(4):789-99. PubMed ID: 10386635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Intraoperative and post-implant dosimetry in patients treated with permanent prostate implant brachytherapy].
Herein A; Ágoston P; Szabó Z; Jorgo K; Markgruber B; Pesznyák C; Polgár C; Major T
Magy Onkol; 2015 Jun; 59(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 26035163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An open-source genetic algorithm for determining optimal seed distributions for low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
McGeachy P; Madamesila J; Beauchamp A; Khan R
Brachytherapy; 2015; 14(5):692-702. PubMed ID: 26023047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
