280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25351495)
1. Predictive distractor context facilitates attentional selection of high, but not intermediate and low, salience targets.
Töllner T; Conci M; Müller HJ
Hum Brain Mapp; 2015 Mar; 36(3):935-44. PubMed ID: 25351495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electrophysiological evidence of low salience distractor interference during visual search.
Fortier-Gauthier U; Jolicœur P
Psychophysiology; 2018 Jul; 55(7):e13068. PubMed ID: 29423999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The guidance of visual search by shape features and shape configurations.
McCants CW; Berggren N; Eimer M
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1072-1085. PubMed ID: 29494192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rewarded visual items capture attention only in heterogeneous contexts.
Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Brandhofer R; Schubö A
Psychophysiology; 2016 Jul; 53(7):1063-73. PubMed ID: 26997364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perceptual Competition Promotes Suppression of Reward Salience in Behavioral Selection and Neural Representation.
Gong M; Jia K; Li S
J Neurosci; 2017 Jun; 37(26):6242-6252. PubMed ID: 28539425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Learned distractor rejection in the face of strong target guidance.
Stilwell BT; Vecera SP
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Sep; 46(9):926-941. PubMed ID: 32391708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Opening the window: Size of the attentional window dominates perceptual load and familiarity in visual selection.
Biggs AT; Gibson BS
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1780-1798. PubMed ID: 30247049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tracking target and distractor processing in fixed-feature visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology.
Jannati A; Gaspar JM; McDonald JJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Dec; 39(6):1713-30. PubMed ID: 23527999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Attentional Access to Multiple Target Objects in Visual Search.
Berggren N; Eimer M
J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Feb; 32(2):283-300. PubMed ID: 31560272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Category-based attentional capture can be influenced by color- and shape-dimensions independently in the conjunction search task.
Wu X; Wang X; Saab R; Jiang Y
Psychophysiology; 2020 Apr; 57(4):e13526. PubMed ID: 31953842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The allocation of resources in visual working memory and multiple attentional templates.
Kerzel D; Witzel C
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 May; 45(5):645-658. PubMed ID: 30920252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perceptual learning induces active suppression of physically nonsalient shapes.
Hu L; Ding Y; Qu Z
Psychophysiology; 2019 Sep; 56(9):e13393. PubMed ID: 31087676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Visual search does not always predict performance in tasks that require finding targets among distractors: The case of line-ending illusory contours.
Hardy NLA; Terry M; Trick LM
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102870. PubMed ID: 31301573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dynamics of Feature-based Attentional Selection during Color-Shape Conjunction Search.
Lee J; Leonard CJ; Luck SJ; Geng JJ
J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 30(12):1773-1787. PubMed ID: 30063176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Processing overlap-dependent distractor dilution rather than perceptual target load determines attentional selectivity.
Tan J; Yin S; Wang L; Chen A; Egner T
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Nov; 80(8):2048-2059. PubMed ID: 29968079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Overt attention in contextual cuing of visual search is driven by the attentional set, but not by the predictiveness of distractors.
Beesley T; Hanafi G; Vadillo MA; Shanks DR; Livesey EJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):707-721. PubMed ID: 29608077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Salience detection and attentional capture.
Schubö A
Psychol Res; 2009 Mar; 73(2):233-43. PubMed ID: 19066945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early and Late Electrophysiological Effects of Distractor Frequency in Picture Naming: Reconciling Input and Output Accounts.
Riès SK; Fraser D; McMahon KL; de Zubicaray GI
J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Oct; 27(10):1936-47. PubMed ID: 26042502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Distractor probability changes the shape of the attentional template.
Geng JJ; DiQuattro NE; Helm J
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1993-2007. PubMed ID: 28425732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anticipatory Distractor Suppression Elicited by Statistical Regularities in Visual Search.
Wang B; van Driel J; Ort E; Theeuwes J
J Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Oct; 31(10):1535-1548. PubMed ID: 31180265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
