BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25351495)

  • 21. The attentional template is shifted and asymmetrically sharpened by distractor context.
    Yu X; Geng JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):336-353. PubMed ID: 30742475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Learned suppression for multiple distractors in visual search.
    Won BY; Geng JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1128-1141. PubMed ID: 29733673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Zooming in on the cause of the perceptual load effect in the go/no-go paradigm.
    Chen Z; Cave KR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1072-87. PubMed ID: 26820251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The time-course of component processes of selective attention.
    Wen T; Duncan J; Mitchell DJ
    Neuroimage; 2019 Oct; 199():396-407. PubMed ID: 31150787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Context homogeneity facilitates both distractor inhibition and target enhancement.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Schubö A
    J Vis; 2013 May; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23650629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Failed Suppression of Salient Stimuli Precedes Behavioral Errors.
    Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Busch NA; Schubö A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Feb; 32(2):367-377. PubMed ID: 31702429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
    Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Adding details to the attentional template offsets search difficulty: Evidence from contralateral delay activity.
    Schmidt J; Zelinsky GJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Mar; 43(3):429-437. PubMed ID: 28240928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Rapid Attentional Selection of Non-native Stimuli despite Perceptual Narrowing.
    Wu R; Nako R; Band J; Pizzuto J; Ghoreishi Y; Scerif G; Aslin R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Nov; 27(11):2299-307. PubMed ID: 26244720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Salience-based selection: attentional capture by distractors less salient than the target.
    Zehetleitner M; Koch AI; Goschy H; Müller HJ
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e52595. PubMed ID: 23382820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Contingent attentional capture across multiple feature dimensions in a temporal search task.
    Ito M; Kawahara JI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Jan; 163():107-13. PubMed ID: 26637932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Alpha Oscillations in the Human Brain Implement Distractor Suppression Independent of Target Selection.
    Wöstmann M; Alavash M; Obleser J
    J Neurosci; 2019 Dec; 39(49):9797-9805. PubMed ID: 31641052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Selective target processing: perceptual load or distractor salience?
    Eltiti S; Wallace D; Fox E
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Jul; 67(5):876-85. PubMed ID: 16334059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Altering spatial priority maps via statistical learning of target selection and distractor filtering.
    Ferrante O; Patacca A; Di Caro V; Della Libera C; Santandrea E; Chelazzi L
    Cortex; 2018 May; 102():67-95. PubMed ID: 29096874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jan; 44(1):13-17. PubMed ID: 29309194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Distinct Mechanisms for Distractor Suppression and Target Facilitation.
    Noonan MP; Adamian N; Pike A; Printzlau F; Crittenden BM; Stokes MG
    J Neurosci; 2016 Feb; 36(6):1797-807. PubMed ID: 26865606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Attentional selection by distractor suppression.
    Caputo G; Guerra S
    Vision Res; 1998 Mar; 38(5):669-89. PubMed ID: 9604099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
    Kumada T
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Top-down deactivation of interference from irrelevant spatial or verbal stimulus features.
    Frings C; Wühr P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Nov; 76(8):2360-74. PubMed ID: 24980154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence reveals the effects of trait anxiety on contingent attentional capture.
    Tsai YC; Lu HJ; Chang CF; Liang WK; Muggleton NG; Juan CH
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 17(5):973-983. PubMed ID: 28656503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.