155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25351990)
1. Inter- and intra-observer agreement on Miller's classification of gingival tissue recessions.
Bertl K; Ruckenbauer D; Müller-Kern M; Durstberger G; Lettner S; Bruckmann C; Ulm C
Odontology; 2015 Sep; 103(3):292-300. PubMed ID: 25351990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing the Reliability of Miller's Classification and Cairo's Classification in Classifying Gingival Recession Defects: A Comparison Study.
Fageeh HI; Fageeh HN; Bhati AK; Thubab AY; Sharrahi HMH; Aljabri YS; Alotaibi FI
Medicina (Kaunas); 2024 Jan; 60(2):. PubMed ID: 38399493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability study of Mahajan's classification of gingival recession: A pioneer clinical study.
Mahajan A; Kashyap D; Kumar A; Mahajan P
J Indian Soc Periodontol; 2014 Jan; 18(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 24744542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Inter- and intra-examiner agreement of three classification systems of gingival recession.
Sarlati F; Moghaddas O; Shabahangfar R; Safari S; Valaei N
J Adv Periodontol Implant Dent; 2019; 11(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 35919627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the clinical applicability of Miller's classification system to Kumar and Masamatti's classification system of gingival recession.
Kumar A; Gupta G; Puri K; Bansal M; Jain D; Khatri M; Masamatti SS
J Indian Soc Periodontol; 2015; 19(5):563-8. PubMed ID: 26644724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic reproducibility of the 2018 Classification of Gingival Recession Defects and Gingival Phenotype: A multicenter inter- and intra-examiner agreement study.
Pini Prato G; Di Gianfilippo R; Pannuti CM; Allen EP; Aroca S; Avila-Ortiz G; Bouchard P; Cairo F; Chackartchi T; Cortellini P; Franceschi D; Mahajan A; Mancini EA; McGuire MK; Natsvlishvili T; Santamaria MP; Scheyer ET; Wang HL; Kornman K; Chambrone L
J Periodontol; 2023 May; 94(5):661-672. PubMed ID: 36464773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The interproximal clinical attachment level to classify gingival recessions and predict root coverage outcomes: an explorative and reliability study.
Cairo F; Nieri M; Cincinelli S; Mervelt J; Pagliaro U
J Clin Periodontol; 2011 Jul; 38(7):661-6. PubMed ID: 21507033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The precision of gingival recession measurements is increased by an automated curvature analysis method.
Kuralt M; Gašperšič R; Fidler A
BMC Oral Health; 2021 Oct; 21(1):505. PubMed ID: 34620155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Treatment of gingival recessions by guided tissue regeneration and coronally advanced flap.
Banihashemrad A; Aghassizadeh E; Radvar M
N Y State Dent J; 2009 Jan; 75(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 19280831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Classification systems for gingival recession and suggestion of a new classification system.
Guttiganur N; Aspalli S; Sanikop MV; Desai A; Gaddale R; Devanoorkar A
Indian J Dent Res; 2018; 29(2):233-237. PubMed ID: 29652020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of orthodontics in the repair of gingival recessions.
Laursen MG; Rylev M; Melsen B
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Jan; 157(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 31901274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Classification of dental surface defects in areas of gingival recession.
Pini-Prato G; Franceschi D; Cairo F; Nieri M; Rotundo R
J Periodontol; 2010 Jun; 81(6):885-90. PubMed ID: 20450362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intra- and inter-rater agreement of a new classification system of gingival recession defects.
Rotundo R; Mori M; Bonaccini D; Baldi C
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2011; 4(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 21808762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A new classification system for gingival and palatal recession.
Kumar A; Masamatti SS
J Indian Soc Periodontol; 2013 Mar; 17(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 23869122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Coronally advanced flap: the post-surgical position of the gingival margin is an important factor for achieving complete root coverage.
Pini Prato GP; Baldi C; Nieri M; Franseschi D; Cortellini P; Clauser C; Rotundo R; Muzzi L
J Periodontol; 2005 May; 76(5):713-22. PubMed ID: 15898931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Treatment of gingival recessions by combined periodontal regenerative technique, guided tissue regeneration, and subpedicle connective tissue graft. A comparative clinical study.
Paolantonio M
J Periodontol; 2002 Jan; 73(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 11846201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of 2 techniques of subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recessions.
Cordioli G; Mortarino C; Chierico A; Grusovin MG; Majzoub Z
J Periodontol; 2001 Nov; 72(11):1470-6. PubMed ID: 11759857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surgical microscope may enhance root coverage with subepithelial connective tissue graft: a randomized-controlled clinical trial.
Bittencourt S; Del Peloso Ribeiro E; Sallum EA; Nociti FH; Casati MZ
J Periodontol; 2012 Jun; 83(6):721-30. PubMed ID: 21870975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An evaluation of the effectiveness and predictability of transpositional flap vs connective tissue graft for coverage of Miller's class-I and class-II facial marginal tissue recession lesions: a clinical study.
Baghele ON; Pol DG
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 22945709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of semilunar coronally advanced flap alone and in combination with button technique in the treatment of Miller's Class I and II gingival recessions: A pilot study.
Bhandari R; Uppal RS; Kahlon KS
Indian J Dent Res; 2015; 26(6):609-12. PubMed ID: 26888240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
