BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25352389)

  • 61. Developing and Sustaining an Effective and Resilient Oncology Careforce: Opportunities for Action.
    Takvorian SU; Balogh E; Nass S; Valentin VL; Hoffman-Hogg L; Oyer RA; Carlson RW; Meropol NJ; Sheldon LK; Shulman LN
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2020 Jul; 112(7):663-670. PubMed ID: 31868912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Implementation of a performance improvement initiative in colorectal cancer care.
    Marshall JL; Cartwright TH; Berry CA; Stowell SA; Miller SC
    J Oncol Pract; 2012 Sep; 8(5):309-14. PubMed ID: 23277769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. An Assessment of the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative: Lessons Learned From a Detailed Assessment of a Well-Established Profession-Based Performance Measurement Program.
    Barysauskas CM; Dalby CK; Catalano PJ; Jacobson JO
    J Healthc Qual; 2017; 39(4):e49-e58. PubMed ID: 27631710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Advancing cancer care: the quality spiral: Sir Thomas Myles Lecture.
    O'Higgins N
    Ir J Med Sci; 2014 Mar; 183(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 24166048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. RightCare: wrong answers.
    Dropkin G
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2018 Sep; 40(3):e367-e374. PubMed ID: 29126274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. New Open-Source Safety and Quality Discussion Guide for Affiliating Oncology Practices.
    Zerillo JA; Lowery KW; Lagoo J; Sato L; Jacobson JO; Haas S
    J Oncol Pract; 2019 Aug; 15(8):417-418. PubMed ID: 31314654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Patient preference and contraindications in measuring quality of care: what do administrative data miss?
    Ryoo JJ; Ordin DL; Antonio AL; Oishi SM; Gould MK; Asch SM; Malin JL
    J Clin Oncol; 2013 Jul; 31(21):2716-23. PubMed ID: 23752110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Using routinely available data and statistical methods to monitor and evaluate quality of care.
    Chen W
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2018 May; 30(4):243. PubMed ID: 29608691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. ASO Author Reflections: A Call to Modify Factors Predictive of Noncompliance with Quality Measures in Breast Cancer Treatment.
    Zheleva V; Lai LL
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2020 Aug; 27(8):2626-2627. PubMed ID: 32236743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. It is possible: quality measurement during serious illness.
    Aldridge MD; Meier DE
    JAMA Intern Med; 2013 Dec 9-23; 173(22):2080-1. PubMed ID: 24126541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Measuring quality of care in the treatment of colorectal cancer: the moffitt quality practice initiative.
    Jacobsen PB; Shibata D; Siegel EM; Druta M; Lee JH; Marshburn J; Davenport L; Cruse H; Levine R; Gondi A; Brown R; Malafa M
    J Oncol Pract; 2007 Mar; 3(2):60-5. PubMed ID: 20859375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Non-target progression--the fine line between objectivity and subjectivity.
    Lheureux S; Wilson MK; O'Malley M; Sinaei M; Oza AM
    Eur J Cancer; 2014 Dec; 50(18):3271-2. PubMed ID: 25450948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. The value of quality of life scores in clinical cancer research.
    Selby P
    Eur J Cancer; 1993; 29A(12):1656-7. PubMed ID: 8398288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Oncologists should intervene.
    Dresler CM
    Cancer; 2012 Jun; 118(12):3012-3. PubMed ID: 22271640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Cancer control in Florida.
    SOWDER WT
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1948 Jul; 35(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 18871885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Integrated, cross-sectoral psycho-oncology (isPO): a new form of care for newly diagnosed cancer patients in Germany.
    Kusch M; Labouvie H; Schiewer V; Talalaev N; Cwik JC; Bussmann S; Vaganian L; Gerlach AL; Dresen A; Cecon N; Salm S; Krieger T; Pfaff H; Lemmen C; Derendorf L; Stock S; Samel C; Hagemeier A; Hellmich M; Leicher B; Hültenschmidt G; Swoboda J; Haas P; Arning A; Göttel A; Schwickerath K; Graeven U; Houwaart S; Kerek-Bodden H; Krebs S; Muth C; Hecker C; Reiser M; Mauch C; Benner J; Schmidt G; Karlowsky C; Vimalanandan G; Matyschik L; Galonska L; Francke A; Osborne K; Nestle U; Bäumer M; Schmitz K; Wolf J; Hallek M
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2022 Apr; 22(1):543. PubMed ID: 35459202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Quality indicators in lung cancer: a review and analysis.
    Chiew KL; Sundaresan P; Jalaludin B; Chong S; Vinod SK
    BMJ Open Qual; 2021 Aug; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 34344690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Screening for Depression in Younger Breast Cancer Survivors: Outcomes From Use of the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire.
    Ganz PA; Bower JE; Partridge AH; Wolff AC; Thorner ED; Joffe H; Irwin MR; Petersen L; Crespi CM
    JNCI Cancer Spectr; 2021 Jun; 5(3):. PubMed ID: 34164605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Importance of and Satisfaction with Psychosocial Support among Cancer Patients and Survivors in Puerto Rico: Gender, Health Status, and Quality of Life Associations.
    Castro EM; Asencio G; Quinn GP; Brandon T; Gwede CK; Vadaparampil S; Simmons V; McIntyre J; Jiménez J
    P R Health Sci J; 2017 Dec; 36(4):205-211. PubMed ID: 29220064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.