These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25352920)

  • 1. Biomechanics and force system of butterfly arch: A device for three-dimensional controlling of upper molars.
    Nikkerdar A
    J Dent Biomech; 2014; 5():1758736014552149. PubMed ID: 25352920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Butterfly arch: a device for precise controlling of the upper molars in three planes of space.
    Nikkerdar A
    J Dent (Tehran); 2013 May; 10(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 25512748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the effectiveness of butterfly arch versus transpalatal arch in anchorage reinforcement: A linear 3D finite element study.
    Bano N; M SK; Shivamurthy PG; Sabrish S; Mathew S
    J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2022; 16(2):101-106. PubMed ID: 36561379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development and biomechanical investigation of a new compound palatal arch.
    Wichelhaus A; Sander C; Sander FG
    J Orofac Orthop; 2004 Mar; 65(2):104-22. PubMed ID: 15206093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modified Transpalatal Arch (m-TPA) for Vertical Control and Anchorage.
    Shastri D; Tandon P; Singh GP; Singh S
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2015; 26(2):45-6. PubMed ID: 26349290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Symmetric and asymmetric expansion of molars using a Burstone-type transpalatal arch. Biomechanical and clinical analysis.
    Tsetsilas M; Konermann AC; Keilig L; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C
    J Orofac Orthop; 2015 Sep; 76(5):377-90. PubMed ID: 26250453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An active, skeletally anchored transpalatal appliance for derotation, distalization and vertical control of maxillary first molars.
    Hourfar J; Ludwig B; Kanavakis G
    J Orthod; 2014 Sep; 41 Suppl 1():S24-32. PubMed ID: 25138362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Orthodontic treatment for distalising upper first molars in children and adolescents.
    Jambi S; Thiruvenkatachari B; O'Brien KD; Walsh T
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Oct; 2013(10):CD008375. PubMed ID: 24155018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of anchorage reinforcement with temporary anchorage devices or a Herbst appliance during lingual orthodontic protraction of mandibular molars without maxillary counterbalance extraction.
    Metzner R; Schwestka-Polly R; Helms HJ; Wiechmann D
    Head Face Med; 2015 Jun; 11():22. PubMed ID: 26092262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mini-screw implant or transpalatal arch-mediated anchorage reinforcement during canine retraction: a randomized clinical trial.
    Sharma M; Sharma V; Khanna B
    J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 39(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 22773673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Herbst appliance with skeletal anchorage versus dental anchorage in adolescents with Class II malocclusion: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Batista KBDSL; Lima T; Palomares N; Carvalho FA; Quintão C; Miguel JAM; Lin YL; Su TL; O'Brien K
    Trials; 2017 Nov; 18(1):564. PubMed ID: 29178932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Midpalatal miniscrews and high-pull headgear for anteroposterior and vertical anchorage control: cephalometric comparisons of treatment changes.
    Lee J; Miyazawa K; Tabuchi M; Kawaguchi M; Shibata M; Goto S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):238-50. PubMed ID: 23910205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The biomechanics of posterior maxillary arch expansion using fixed labial and lingual appliances.
    Kaur H; Owen B; Tran B; Guan R; Luo J; Granley A; Carey JP; Major PW; Romanyk DL
    Angle Orthod; 2020 Sep; 90(5):688-694. PubMed ID: 33378485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative evaluation of transpalatal arch and vertical holding appliance at different heights.
    Nayak TK; Nanda SB; Sinha A; Pradhan R; Pattanaik S; Sahoo SN
    J Taibah Univ Med Sci; 2022 Jun; 17(3):401-407. PubMed ID: 35722232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of the transpalatal arch during extraction treatment.
    Zablocki HL; McNamara JA; Franchi L; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):852-60. PubMed ID: 18538249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness of the transpalatal arch in controlling orthodontic anchorage in maxillary premolar extraction cases: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Diar-Bakirly S; Feres MF; Saltaji H; Flores-Mir C; El-Bialy T
    Angle Orthod; 2017 Jan; 87(1):147-158. PubMed ID: 27504820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correction of a skeletal Class II malocclusion with severe crowding by a specially designed rapid maxillary expander.
    Wang H; Feng J; Lu P; Shen G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Feb; 147(2):242-51. PubMed ID: 25636559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of temporary anchorage devices and transpalatal arch-mediated anchorage reinforcement during canine retraction.
    Kecik D
    Eur J Dent; 2016; 10(4):512-516. PubMed ID: 28042267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of the effects of 2 mandibular anchorage systems used with a 3-dimensional bimetric maxillary distalizing arch.
    Okay C; Gülsen A; Keykubat A; Ucem TT; Yüksel S
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 16779970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Molar distalization with the assistance of Temporary Anchorage Devices.
    Palencar AJ
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2015; 26(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 25881377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.