216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25353076)
1. Comparison of total and segmental body composition using DXA and multifrequency bioimpedance in collegiate female athletes.
Esco MR; Snarr RL; Leatherwood MD; Chamberlain NA; Redding ML; Flatt AA; Moon JR; Williford HN
J Strength Cond Res; 2015 Apr; 29(4):918-25. PubMed ID: 25353076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Total and Segmental Body Composition Examination in Collegiate Football Players Using Multifrequency Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis and Dual X-ray Absorptiometry.
Raymond CJ; Dengel DR; Bosch TA
J Strength Cond Res; 2018 Mar; 32(3):772-782. PubMed ID: 29120982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Agreement between single-frequency bioimpedance analysis and dual energy x-ray absorptiometry varies based on sex and segmental mass.
Nickerson BS
Nutr Res; 2018 Jun; 54():33-39. PubMed ID: 29914665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Appendicular Body Composition Analysis: Validity of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Compared With Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in Division I College Athletes.
Brewer GJ; Blue MNM; Hirsch KR; Peterjohn AM; Smith-Ryan AE
J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Nov; 33(11):2920-2925. PubMed ID: 31469766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Offseason Body Composition Changes Detected by Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry versus Multifrequency Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in Collegiate American Football Athletes.
Boykin JR; Tinsley GM; Harrison CM; Prather J; Zaragoza J; Tinnin M; Smith S; Wilson C; Taylor LW
Sports (Basel); 2021 Aug; 9(8):. PubMed ID: 34437373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Agreement Between 2 Segmental Bioimpedance Devices, BOD POD, and DXA in Obese Adults.
Nickerson BS; McLester CN; McLester JR; Kliszczewicz BM
J Clin Densitom; 2020; 23(1):138-148. PubMed ID: 31122829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Explaining Discrepancies Between Total and Segmental DXA and BIA Body Composition Estimates Using Bayesian Regression.
Tinsley GM; Moore ML; Rafi Z; Griffiths N; Harty PS; Stratton MT; Benavides ML; Dellinger JR; Adamson BT
J Clin Densitom; 2021; 24(2):294-307. PubMed ID: 32571645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. New bioimpedance analysis system: improved phenotyping with whole-body analysis.
Pietrobelli A; Rubiano F; St-Onge MP; Heymsfield SB
Eur J Clin Nutr; 2004 Nov; 58(11):1479-84. PubMed ID: 15138459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of bioelectrical impedance and DXA for measuring body composition among adults with Down syndrome.
Esco MR; Nickerson BS; Russell AR
Disabil Health J; 2017 Oct; 10(4):548-551. PubMed ID: 28411023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development and validation of BIA prediction equations of upper and lower limb lean soft tissue in athletes.
Sardinha LB; Correia IR; Magalhães JP; Júdice PB; Silva AM; Hetherington-Rauth M
Eur J Clin Nutr; 2020 Dec; 74(12):1646-1652. PubMed ID: 32472025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability and Agreement of Various InBody Body Composition Analyzers as Compared to Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in Healthy Men and Women.
McLester CN; Nickerson BS; Kliszczewicz BM; McLester JR
J Clin Densitom; 2020; 23(3):443-450. PubMed ID: 30472111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of octa-polar bioelectrical impedance analysis for the assessment of total and appendicular body composition in children and adolescents with HIV: comparison with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and air displacement plethysmography.
de Castro JAC; de Lima LRA; Silva DAS
J Hum Nutr Diet; 2018 Apr; 31(2):276-285. PubMed ID: 28799180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Good agreement between bioelectrical impedance and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for estimating changes in body composition during weight loss in overweight young women.
Thomson R; Brinkworth GD; Buckley JD; Noakes M; Clifton PM
Clin Nutr; 2007 Dec; 26(6):771-7. PubMed ID: 17936443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of body composition assessment across body mass index categories by two multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis devices and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in clinical settings.
Lahav Y; Goldstein N; Gepner Y
Eur J Clin Nutr; 2021 Aug; 75(8):1275-1282. PubMed ID: 33483630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Multifrequency Bioelectrical Impedance vs. Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry for Assessing Body Composition Changes After Participation in a 10-Week Resistance Training Program.
Schoenfeld BJ; Nickerson BS; Wilborn CD; Urbina SL; Hayward SB; Krieger J; Aragon AA; Tinsley GM
J Strength Cond Res; 2020 Mar; 34(3):678-688. PubMed ID: 29927888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Agreement Between Standard Body Composition Methods to Estimate Percentage of Body Fat in Young Male Athletes.
Ferri-Morales A; Nascimento-Ferreira MV; Vlachopoulos D; Ubago-Guisado E; Torres-Costoso A; De Moraes ACF; Barker AR; Moreno LA; Martínez-Vizcaino V; Gracia-Marco L
Pediatr Exerc Sci; 2018 Aug; 30(3):402-410. PubMed ID: 29543127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparative analysis of body composition assessment methods in healthy men and in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: anthropometry, bioelectrical impedance and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry].
Freitas Júnior IF; Rupp de Paiva SA; de Godoy I; Smaili Santos SM; Campana AO
Arch Latinoam Nutr; 2005 Jun; 55(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 16335221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of a portable bioelectrical impedance analyzer for the assessment of body composition.
Karelis AD; Chamberland G; Aubertin-Leheudre M; Duval C;
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2013 Jan; 38(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 23368825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Urine Specific Gravity Effect on Total and Segmental Body Composition Validity of Multifrequency Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Compared With Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.
Fleck SJ; Hayes A; Stadler G; Goesch T; Goldammer M; Braun S
J Strength Cond Res; 2021 Feb; 35(2):373-384. PubMed ID: 33337697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Body composition assessment in adults with cystic fibrosis: comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with skinfolds and bioelectrical impedance analysis.
King S; Wilson J; Kotsimbos T; Bailey M; Nyulasi I
Nutrition; 2005; 21(11-12):1087-94. PubMed ID: 16183254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
