359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25353214)
1. Trends of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Germany from 1990 to 2012: a population-based study.
Kyvernitakis I; Reichelt J; Kyvernitakis A; Misselwitz B; Hadji P; Schmidt S; Kalder M
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2014 Oct; 218(5):203-9. PubMed ID: 25353214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Recent trends and patterns in cesarean and vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) deliveries in the United States.
MacDorman M; Declercq E; Menacker F
Clin Perinatol; 2011 Jun; 38(2):179-92. PubMed ID: 21645788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Population-based study on trends in the mode of delivery subsequent to stillbirth, infant mortality and severe infant malformations in the state of Hesse, Germany between 1990 and 2012.
Kalder M; Reichelt J; Kyvernitakis I; Misselwitz B; Hadji P; Schmidt S
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2014 Jun; 218(3):113-21. PubMed ID: 24999789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Success rate of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital.
Tongsong T; Jitawong C
J Med Assoc Thai; 2003 Sep; 86(9):829-35. PubMed ID: 14649967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Trends and patterns of vaginal birth after cesarean availability in the United States.
Gregory KD; Fridman M; Korst L
Semin Perinatol; 2010 Aug; 34(4):237-43. PubMed ID: 20654773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Obstetric outcomes in women with two prior cesarean deliveries: is vaginal birth after cesarean delivery a viable option?
Macones GA; Cahill A; Pare E; Stamilio DM; Ratcliffe S; Stevens E; Sammel M; Peipert J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 192(4):1223-8; discussion 1228-9. PubMed ID: 15846208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Vaginal birth after Cesarean delivery: predicting success, risks of failure.
Durnwald C; Mercer B
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Jun; 15(6):388-93. PubMed ID: 15280110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vaginal birth after Cesarean rates are declining rapidly in the rural state of Maine.
Pinette MG; Kahn J; Gross KL; Wax JR; Blackstone J; Cartin A
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Jul; 16(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 15370081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery.
Landon MB; Leindecker S; Spong CY; Hauth JC; Bloom S; Varner MW; Moawad AH; Caritis SN; Harper M; Wapner RJ; Sorokin Y; Miodovnik M; Carpenter M; Peaceman AM; O'Sullivan MJ; Sibai BM; Langer O; Thorp JM; Ramin SM; Mercer BM; Gabbe SG;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Sep; 193(3 Pt 2):1016-23. PubMed ID: 16157104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. State variation in rates of cesarean and VBAC delivery: 1989 and 1993.
Clarke SC; Taffel SM
Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co; 1996; 77(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 8744893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Do They Stand a Chance? Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Section in Adolescents Compared to Adult Women.
Damle LF; Wilson K; Huang CC; Landy HJ; Gomez-Lobo V
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2015 Aug; 28(4):219-23. PubMed ID: 26024936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Temporal trends in the rates of trial of labor in low-risk pregnancies and their impact on the rates and success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
Yeh J; Wactawski-Wende J; Shelton JA; Reschke J
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jan; 194(1):144. PubMed ID: 16389024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: practice patterns of obstetrician-gynecologists.
Coleman VH; Erickson K; Schulkin J; Zinberg S; Sachs BP
J Reprod Med; 2005 Apr; 50(4):261-6. PubMed ID: 15916210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Declining cesarean section rates: a continuing trend?
Millar WJ; Nair C; Wadhera S
Health Rep; 1996; 8(1):17-24 (Eng); 17-24 (Fre). PubMed ID: 8844177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vaginal birth after cesarean birth--California, 1996-2000.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2002 Nov; 51(44):996-8. PubMed ID: 12455908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Vaginal birth after cesarean section-The world trend and local experience in Taiwan.
Tsai HT; Wu CH
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 56(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 28254224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Trends in cesarean birth and vaginal birth after previous cesarean, 1991-99.
Menacker F; Curtin SC
Natl Vital Stat Rep; 2001 Dec; 49(13):1-16. PubMed ID: 11793867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rates of caesarian section and trials and success of vaginal birth after caesarean sections in secondary care hospital.
Bano R; Mushtaq A; Adhi M; Saleem MD; Saif A; Siddiqui A; Parveen T; Saif A
J Pak Med Assoc; 2015 Jan; 65(1):81-3. PubMed ID: 25831682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of prior vaginal delivery or prior vaginal birth after cesarean delivery on obstetric outcomes in women undergoing trial of labor.
Hendler I; Bujold E
Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Aug; 104(2):273-7. PubMed ID: 15291999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
