206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25354089)
1. Biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes: positively contributing factors of Sphingomonas.
Gutman J; Herzberg M; Walker SL
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Dec; 48(23):13941-50. PubMed ID: 25354089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of higher alginate expression on deposition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in radial stagnation point flow and reverse osmosis systems.
Herzberg M; Rezene TZ; Ziemba C; Gillor O; Mathee K
Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Oct; 43(19):7376-83. PubMed ID: 19848149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Viscoelastic Properties of Extracellular Polymeric Substances Can Strongly Affect Their Washing Efficiency from Reverse Osmosis Membranes.
Ferrando Chavez DL; Nejidat A; Herzberg M
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Sep; 50(17):9206-13. PubMed ID: 27404109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Role of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes.
Herzberg M; Kang S; Elimelech M
Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Jun; 43(12):4393-8. PubMed ID: 19603652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multispecies biofilms on reverse osmosis membrane dictate the function and characteristics of the bacterial communities rather than their structure.
Ran N; Sorek G; Stein N; Sharon-Gojman R; Herzberg M; Gillor O
Environ Res; 2023 Aug; 231(Pt 1):115999. PubMed ID: 37105294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of antiscalants on biofouling of RO membranes in seawater desalination.
Sweity A; Oren Y; Ronen Z; Herzberg M
Water Res; 2013 Jun; 47(10):3389-98. PubMed ID: 23615335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Feasibility of supercritical CO₂ treatment for controlling biofouling in the reverse osmosis process.
Mun S; Baek Y; Kim C; Lee YW; Yoon J
Biofouling; 2012; 28(6):627-33. PubMed ID: 22726211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bacterial growth through microfiltration membranes and NOM characteristics in an MF-RO integrated membrane system: Lab-scale and full-scale studies.
Park JW; Lee YJ; Meyer AS; Douterelo I; Maeng SK
Water Res; 2018 Nov; 144():36-45. PubMed ID: 30014977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of organic nutrient load on biomass accumulation, feed channel pressure drop increase and permeate flux decline in membrane systems.
Bucs SS; Valladares Linares R; van Loosdrecht MC; Kruithof JC; Vrouwenvelder JS
Water Res; 2014 Dec; 67():227-42. PubMed ID: 25282091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Monitoring biofouling based on aerobic respiration in reverse osmosis system.
Yu Y; Park KY; Jung J; Song W; Kim J; Ryu J; Lade H; Kweon J
J Environ Sci (China); 2019 Apr; 78():247-256. PubMed ID: 30665643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combination of cupric ion with hydroxylamine and hydrogen peroxide for the control of bacterial biofilms on RO membranes.
Lee HJ; Kim HE; Lee C
Water Res; 2017 Mar; 110():83-90. PubMed ID: 27998786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes: effects of cleaning on biofilm microbial communities, membrane performance, and adherence of extracellular polymeric substances.
Al Ashhab A; Sweity A; Bayramoglu B; Herzberg M; Gillor O
Biofouling; 2017 May; 33(5):397-409. PubMed ID: 28468513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Review - Bacteria and their extracellular polymeric substances causing biofouling on seawater reverse osmosis desalination membranes.
Nagaraj V; Skillman L; Li D; Ho G
J Environ Manage; 2018 Oct; 223():586-599. PubMed ID: 29975885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Role of Reverse Divalent Cation Diffusion in Forward Osmosis Biofouling.
Xie M; Bar-Zeev E; Hashmi SM; Nghiem LD; Elimelech M
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Nov; 49(22):13222-9. PubMed ID: 26503882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bacterial adhesion onto nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes: effect of permeate flux.
Semião AJ; Habimana O; Casey E
Water Res; 2014 Oct; 63():296-305. PubMed ID: 25016321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In-situ biofilm characterization in membrane systems using Optical Coherence Tomography: formation, structure, detachment and impact of flux change.
Dreszer C; Wexler AD; Drusová S; Overdijk T; Zwijnenburg A; Flemming HC; Kruithof JC; Vrouwenvelder JS
Water Res; 2014 Dec; 67():243-54. PubMed ID: 25282092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diminished swelling of cross-linked aromatic oligoamide surfaces revealing a new fouling mechanism of reverse-osmosis membranes.
Ying W; Kumar R; Herzberg M; Kasher R
Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jun; 49(11):6815-22. PubMed ID: 25920584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Non-destructive approaches for assessing biofouling of household reverse osmosis membranes.
Markwardt SD; Ronnie N; Camper AK
Biofouling; 2018 Aug; 34(7):740-752. PubMed ID: 30270657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Different bacterial species and their extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) significantly affected reverse osmosis (RO) membrane fouling potentials in wastewater reclamation.
Yu T; Sun H; Chen Z; Wang YH; Huo ZY; Ikuno N; Ishii K; Jin Y; Hu HY; Wu YH; Lu Y
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Dec; 644():486-493. PubMed ID: 29990899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Chlorine disinfection significantly aggravated the biofouling of reverse osmosis membrane used for municipal wastewater reclamation.
Wang YH; Wu YH; Tong X; Yu T; Peng L; Bai Y; Zhao XH; Huo ZY; Ikuno N; Hu HY
Water Res; 2019 May; 154():246-257. PubMed ID: 30798179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
