These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. The Supreme Court, the Texas Abortion Law (SB8), and the Beginning of the End of Roe v Wade? Cohen IG; Adashi EY; Gostin LO JAMA; 2021 Oct; 326(15):1473-1474. PubMed ID: 34554180 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. US abortion: Supreme Court allows Texas to continue to ban emergency abortions. Tanne JH BMJ; 2024 Oct; 387():q2234. PubMed ID: 39389609 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Implications of the Federal Abortion Ban for Women's Health in the United States. Weitz TA; Yanow S Reprod Health Matters; 2008 May; 16(31 Suppl):99-107. PubMed ID: 18772090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inverting the viability test for abortion law. Ching B Womens Rights Law Report; 2000; 22(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 16281341 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. US Supreme Court to hear challenge to restrictive Texas abortion law. McCarthy M BMJ; 2015 Nov; 351():h6177. PubMed ID: 26573104 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion wars, once again. The case being argued this week before the Supreme Court may determine just how far state restrictions can go. Halloran L US News World Rep; 2005 Dec; 139(21):29-30. PubMed ID: 16389673 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Abortion Disclosure Laws and the First Amendment: The Broader Public Health Implications of the Supreme Court's Becerra Decision. Pomeranz JL Am J Public Health; 2019 Mar; 109(3):412-418. PubMed ID: 30676798 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Family law I: abortion. Koscs ME Annu Surv Am Law; 1984; 2():929-60. PubMed ID: 16086473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. US judge again rules that partial birth abortion is unconstitutional. Tanne JH BMJ; 2004 Sep; 329(7467):644. PubMed ID: 15374909 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Legislative restrictions on abortion. Hill BJ Virtual Mentor; 2012 Feb; 14(2):133-6. PubMed ID: 23116955 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Resignation of US judge puts reproductive rights at risk. Hopkins Tanne J BMJ; 2005 Jul; 331(7509):130. PubMed ID: 16020851 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Forgotten Supreme Court abortion cases: Drs. Hawker and Hurwitz in the deck and defrocked. Lucas R Pepperdine Law Rev; 2003 May; 30(4):641-70. PubMed ID: 15237509 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. What Lawrence v. Texas says about the history and future of reproductive rights. Dailard C Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):717-23. PubMed ID: 16700117 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. What happens if Roe is overruled? Extraterritorial regulation of abortion by the states. Bradford CS Ariz Law Rev; 1993; 35(1):87-171. PubMed ID: 12645556 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The law of the sacred cow: sacrificing the First Amendment to defend abortion on demand. Lugosi C Denver Univ Law Rev; 2001; 79(1):91-135. PubMed ID: 12769120 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Reading the abortion ruling. Tolson J US News World Rep; 2007 Apr; 142(15):36. PubMed ID: 17491476 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Supreme Court and the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care. Poppema ST MedGenMed; 2007; 9(3):41; author reply 41. PubMed ID: 18159625 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]