These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25354191)
21. The Supreme Court and the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care. Gartner EC MedGenMed; 2007; 9(3):41; author reply 41. PubMed ID: 18159623 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Liberty and community in constitutional law: the abortion cases in comparative perspective. Kommer DP Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1985; 1985(3):371-410. PubMed ID: 12186067 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. United States Supreme Court and abortion. 1. Holman EJ JAMA; 1973 Jul; 225(2):215-6. PubMed ID: 4740289 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Abortion and the Supreme Court: advancing the culture of death. Catholic Church. National Conference of Catholic Bishops (NCCB) Origins; 2000 Dec; 30(26):405, 407. PubMed ID: 12542054 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Casey and its impact on abortion regulation. Moses MF Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):805-15. PubMed ID: 16700123 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Care Churn - Why Keeping Clinic Doors Open Isn't Enough to Ensure Access to Abortion. McGowan ML; Norris AH; Bessett D N Engl J Med; 2020 Aug; 383(6):508-510. PubMed ID: 32757520 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The Supreme Court's Crisis Pregnancy Center Case - Implications for Health Law. Parmet WE; Berman ML; Smith JA N Engl J Med; 2018 Oct; 379(16):1489-1491. PubMed ID: 30156965 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Supreme Court actions in anti-abortion protest cases. Health Care Law Newsl; 1994 Apr; 9(4):22-4. PubMed ID: 10133587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The partial death of abortion rights. Charo RA N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2125-8. PubMed ID: 17452437 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Government in medicine. Drazen JM N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2195. PubMed ID: 17452438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The abortion debate thirty years later: from choice to coercion. Kramlich M Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):783-804. PubMed ID: 16700122 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Referral-making in the current landscape of abortion access. Zurek M; O'Donnell J; Hart R; Rogow D Contraception; 2015 Jan; 91(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 25497180 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Abortion politics and health insurance reform. Annas GJ N Engl J Med; 2009 Dec; 361(27):2589-91. PubMed ID: 19955513 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Abortion legislation after Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: model statutes and commentaries. Smolin DM Cumberland Law Rev; 1989-1990; 20(1):71-163. PubMed ID: 15999438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. US Supreme Court strikes down key provisions of restrictive Texas abortion law. McCarthy M BMJ; 2016 Jun; 353():i3602. PubMed ID: 27353183 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. When the shouting has to stop: America and abortion. Economist; 1992 Apr; 323(7756):15-6. PubMed ID: 16001469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The intimidation of American physicians--banning partial-birth abortion. Greene MF N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2128-9. PubMed ID: 17452436 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The Legal Challenge of Abortion Stigma-and Government Restrictions on the Practice of Medicine. Fox D Hastings Cent Rep; 2020 Mar; 50(2):13-15. PubMed ID: 32311137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Consti-tortion: tort law as an end-run around abortion rights after Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Stone AJ Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2000; 8(2):471-515. PubMed ID: 16594110 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]