These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Interplay between intensity standardization and inhomogeneity correction in MR image processing. Madabhushi A; Udupa JK IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 May; 24(5):561-76. PubMed ID: 15889544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of Gd-DTPA induCED susceptibility on single-point Dixon fat/water separation. Hoory T; Ramsay E; Plewes DB Magn Reson Med; 2008 Apr; 59(4):925-9. PubMed ID: 18302226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Image quality of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the liver using dual-source parallel radiofrequency transmission technology: Comparison with the post-processing correction method for B1 inhomogeneity-induced signal loss. Takayama Y; Nishie A; Asayama Y; Ishigami K; Kakihara D; Nakayama T; Yoshiura T; Obara M; Hirakawa M; Honda H Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3035-40. PubMed ID: 22578836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An efficient level set method for simultaneous intensity inhomogeneity correction and segmentation of MR images. Ivanovska T; Laqua R; Wang L; Schenk A; Yoon JH; Hegenscheid K; Völzke H; Liebscher V Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2016 Mar; 48():9-20. PubMed ID: 26741125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fat suppression with short inversion time inversion-recovery and chemical-shift selective saturation: a dual STIR-CHESS combination prepulse for turbo spin echo pulse sequences. Tanabe K; Nishikawa K; Sano T; Sakai O; Jara H J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 May; 31(5):1277-81. PubMed ID: 20432368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the artifacts caused by metallic implants in breast MRI using dual-echo dixon versus conventional fat-suppression techniques. Le Y; Kipfer HD; Majidi SS; Holz S; Lin C AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):W307-14. PubMed ID: 25148189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. SEMAC-VAT and MSVAT-SPACE sequence strategies for metal artifact reduction in 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging. Ai T; Padua A; Goerner F; Nittka M; Gugala Z; Jadhav S; Trelles M; Johnson RF; Lindsey RW; Li X; Runge VM Invest Radiol; 2012 May; 47(5):267-76. PubMed ID: 22266987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of proton-density bias corrections based on T1 measurement for robust quantification of water content in the brain at 3 Tesla. Abbas Z; Gras V; Möllenhoff K; Keil F; Oros-Peusquens AM; Shah NJ Magn Reson Med; 2014 Dec; 72(6):1735-45. PubMed ID: 24436248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Water-fat separation with parallel imaging based on BLADE. Weng D; Pan Y; Zhong X; Zhuo Y Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Jun; 31(5):656-63. PubMed ID: 23290479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development and evaluation of TWIST Dixon for dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI with improved acquisition efficiency and fat suppression. Le Y; Kroeker R; Kipfer HD; Lin C J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Aug; 36(2):483-91. PubMed ID: 22544731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dixon techniques for water and fat imaging. Ma J J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Sep; 28(3):543-58. PubMed ID: 18777528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnetic resonance imaging based determination of body compartments with the versatile, interactive sparse sampling (VISS) method. Buehler T; Ramseier N; Machann J; Schwenzer NF; Boesch C J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Oct; 36(4):951-60. PubMed ID: 22645058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Water-fat separation from a single spatiotemporally encoded echo based on nominal k-space peaking and joint regularized estimation. Chen Y; Cai C; Zhong J; Chen Z Magn Reson Med; 2015 Apr; 73(4):1441-9. PubMed ID: 24798405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimizing the acceleration and resolution of three-dimensional fat image navigators for high-resolution motion correction at 7T. Gallichan D; Marques JP Magn Reson Med; 2017 Feb; 77(2):547-558. PubMed ID: 26877158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of visceral adipose tissue quantification on water suppressed and nonwater-suppressed MRI at 3.0 Tesla. Zhou A; Murillo H; Cusi K; Peng Q J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Jun; 35(6):1445-52. PubMed ID: 22246813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lipid elimination with an echo-shifting N/2-ghost acquisition (LEENA) MRI. Lu L; Donnola SB; Koontz M; Griswold MA; Duerk JL; Flask CA Magn Reson Med; 2015 Feb; 73(2):711-7. PubMed ID: 24639034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Water excitation MPRAGE: an alternative sequence for postcontrast imaging of the abdomen in noncooperative patients at 1.5 Tesla and 3.0 Tesla MRI. Altun E; Semelka RC; Dale BM; Elias J J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 May; 27(5):1146-54. PubMed ID: 18425826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characterization of brown adipose tissue by water-fat separated magnetic resonance imaging. Romu T; Elander L; Leinhard OD; Lidell ME; Betz MJ; Persson A; Enerbäck S; Borga M J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 42(6):1639-45. PubMed ID: 25914213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]