BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25355431)

  • 1. Effect of Medicare dialysis payment reform on use of erythropoiesis stimulating agents.
    Swaminathan S; Mor V; Mehrotra R; Trivedi AN
    Health Serv Res; 2015 Jun; 50(3):790-808. PubMed ID: 25355431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Association Between Changes in CMS Reimbursement Policy and Drug Labels for Erythrocyte-Stimulating Agents With Outcomes for Older Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis Covered by Fee-for-Service Medicare.
    Wang C; Kane R; Levenson M; Kelman J; Wernecke M; Lee JY; Kozlowski S; Dekmezian C; Zhang Z; Thompson A; Smith K; Wu YT; Wei Y; Chillarige Y; Ryan Q; Worrall C; MaCurdy TE; Graham DJ
    JAMA Intern Med; 2016 Dec; 176(12):1818-1825. PubMed ID: 27775769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bundled-rate legislation for Medicare reimbursement for dialysis services: implications for anemia management with ESAs.
    Charytan C
    Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2010 Dec; 5(12):2355-62. PubMed ID: 21071515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bundled payment for ESRD--including ESAs in Medicare's dialysis package.
    Iglehart JK
    N Engl J Med; 2011 Feb; 364(7):593-5. PubMed ID: 21323538
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Finding a rational approach to ESA therapy--for payers and patients.
    Messana A
    Nephrol News Issues; 2007 Sep; 21(10):54, 56. PubMed ID: 17918481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ESA payment changes: chasing a moving target.
    Sargent JA
    Nephrol News Issues; 2008 Jan; 22(1):36-7. PubMed ID: 18271437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When payment systems collide: the effect of hospitalization on anemia in renal dialysis patients.
    Turenne MN; Hirth RA; Messana JM; Turner JS; Sleeman KK; Wheeler JR
    Med Care; 2010 Apr; 48(4):296-305. PubMed ID: 20195175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Major declines in epoetin dosing after prospective payment system based on dialysis facility organizational status.
    Thamer M; Zhang Y; Kaufman J; Kshirsagar O; Cotter D; Hernán MA
    Am J Nephrol; 2014; 40(6):554-60. PubMed ID: 25592645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Projected impact of the proposed "bundled" ESRD payment system on a small dialysis organization.
    Bhat P; Sokolowski W; Bhat JG
    Nephrol News Issues; 2009 Jun; 23(7):46, 48-52. PubMed ID: 19585810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Economic considerations in a changing anemia environment.
    Pizzi LT
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2008 Dec; 52(6 Suppl):S29-33. PubMed ID: 19010259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transfusions increase with nationally driven reimbursement changes of erythropoiesis stimulating agents for chemotherapy-induced anemia.
    Yu JM; Shord SS; Cuellar S
    J Oncol Pharm Pract; 2011 Dec; 17(4):360-5. PubMed ID: 20826550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative mortality risk of anemia management practices in incident hemodialysis patients.
    Brookhart MA; Schneeweiss S; Avorn J; Bradbury BD; Liu J; Winkelmayer WC
    JAMA; 2010 Mar; 303(9):857-64. PubMed ID: 20197532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Practice patterns, case mix, Medicare payment policy, and dialysis facility costs.
    Hirth RA; Held PJ; Orzol SM; Dor A
    Health Serv Res; 1999 Feb; 33(6):1567-92. PubMed ID: 10029498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Early trends from the Study to Evaluate the Prospective Payment System Impact on Small Dialysis Organizations (STEPPS).
    Brunelli SM; Monda KL; Burkart JM; Gitlin M; Neumann PJ; Park GS; Symonian-Silver M; Yue S; Bradbury BD; Rubin RJ
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2013 Jun; 61(6):947-56. PubMed ID: 23332991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Different analyses estimate different parameters of the effect of erythropoietin stimulating agents on survival in end stage renal disease: a comparison of payment policy analysis, instrumental variables, and multiple imputation of potential outcomes.
    Dore DD; Swaminathan S; Gutman R; Trivedi AN; Mor V
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 66(8 Suppl):S42-50. PubMed ID: 23849152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anemia management under a bundled payment policy for dialysis: a preview for the United States from Japan.
    Wish JB
    Kidney Int; 2011 Feb; 79(3):265-7. PubMed ID: 21228798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Iron replacement therapy: assessing today's options to prepare for bundling.
    Yee J
    Nephrol News Issues; 2010 Feb; 24(2):suppl 1-8. PubMed ID: 20333988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services national coverage determination on erythropoiesis-stimulating agent and transfusion use in chemotherapy-treated cancer patients.
    Arneson TJ; Li S; Gilbertson DT; Bridges KR; Acquavella JF; Collins AJ
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2012 Aug; 21(8):857-64. PubMed ID: 22450901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inflammation, high ferritin, and erythropoietin resistance in indigenous maintenance hemodialysis patients from the Top End of Northern Australia.
    Majoni SW; Ellis JA; Hall H; Abeyaratne A; Lawton PD
    Hemodial Int; 2014 Oct; 18(4):740-50. PubMed ID: 24766376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What can we learn from the U.S. expanded end-stage renal disease bundle?
    Chambers JD; Weiner DE; Bliss SK; Neumann PJ
    Health Policy; 2013 May; 110(2-3):164-71. PubMed ID: 23419419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.