BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25355470)

  • 1. Power calculation for comparing diagnostic accuracies in a multi-reader, multi-test design.
    Kim E; Zhang Z; Wang Y; Zeng D
    Biometrics; 2014 Dec; 70(4):1033-41. PubMed ID: 25355470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A marginal model approach for analysis of multi-reader multi-test receiver operating characteristic (ROC) data.
    Song X; Zhou XH
    Biostatistics; 2005 Apr; 6(2):303-12. PubMed ID: 15772108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A permutation test for comparing ROC curves in multireader studies a multi-reader ROC, permutation test.
    Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Apr; 13(4):414-20. PubMed ID: 16554220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combining dependent tests to compare the diagnostic accuracies--a non-parametric approach.
    Yang Y; Jin Z
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1239-50. PubMed ID: 16158406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hierarchical models for ROC curve summary measures: design and analysis of multi-reader, multi-modality studies of medical tests.
    Wang F; Gatsonis CA
    Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):243-56. PubMed ID: 17340598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prediction accuracy of a sample-size estimation method for ROC studies.
    Chakraborty DP
    Acad Radiol; 2010 May; 17(5):628-38. PubMed ID: 20380980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Paired ROC Curves through a Two-Stage Test.
    Yu W; Park E; Chang YC
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(5):881-902. PubMed ID: 24905904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A parametric comparison of diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic groups.
    Xiong C; van Belle G; Miller JP; Yan Y; Gao F; Yu K; Morris JC
    Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17763377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A global goodness-of-fit test for receiver operating characteristic curve analysis via the bootstrap method.
    Zou KH; Resnic FS; Talos IF; Goldberg-Zimring D; Bhagwat JG; Haker SJ; Kikinis R; Jolesz FA; Ohno-Machado L
    J Biomed Inform; 2005 Oct; 38(5):395-403. PubMed ID: 16198998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Verification of modified receiver-operating characteristic software using simulated rating data.
    Shiraishi J; Fukuoka D; Iha R; Inada H; Tanaka R; Hara T
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2018 Dec; 11(4):406-414. PubMed ID: 30244314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measurement error and confidence intervals for ROC curves.
    Tosteson TD; Buonaccorsi JP; Demidenko E; Wells WA
    Biom J; 2005 Aug; 47(4):409-16. PubMed ID: 16161800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Bayesian hierarchical non-linear regression model in receiver operating characteristic analysis of clustered continuous diagnostic data.
    Zou KH; O'Malley AJ
    Biom J; 2005 Aug; 47(4):417-27. PubMed ID: 16161801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimum-norm estimation for binormal receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
    Davidov O; Nov Y
    Biom J; 2009 Dec; 51(6):1030-46. PubMed ID: 19894216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multireader receiver operating characteristic studies: a comparison of study designs.
    Obuchowski NA
    Acad Radiol; 1995 Aug; 2(8):709-16. PubMed ID: 9419629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of correlated ROC areas in diagnostic testing.
    Song HH
    Biometrics; 1997 Mar; 53(1):370-82. PubMed ID: 9147602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tests of equivalence and non-inferiority for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired areas under ROC curves.
    Liu JP; Ma MC; Wu CY; Tai JY
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1219-38. PubMed ID: 16158400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A conditional nonparametric test for comparing two areas under the ROC curves from a paired design.
    Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Mar; 12(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 15766688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationship between Roe and Metz simulation model for multireader diagnostic data and Obuchowski-Rockette model parameters.
    Hillis SL
    Stat Med; 2018 Jun; 37(13):2067-2093. PubMed ID: 29609206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation and statistical power comparison of methods for analyzing free-response observer performance studies.
    Chakraborty DP
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Dec; 15(12):1554-66. PubMed ID: 19000872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative statistical properties of expected utility and area under the ROC curve for laboratory studies of observer performance in screening mammography.
    Abbey CK; Gallas BD; Boone JM; Niklason LT; Hadjiiski LM; Sahiner B; Samuelson FW
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Apr; 21(4):481-90. PubMed ID: 24594418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.