189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25355470)
1. Power calculation for comparing diagnostic accuracies in a multi-reader, multi-test design.
Kim E; Zhang Z; Wang Y; Zeng D
Biometrics; 2014 Dec; 70(4):1033-41. PubMed ID: 25355470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A marginal model approach for analysis of multi-reader multi-test receiver operating characteristic (ROC) data.
Song X; Zhou XH
Biostatistics; 2005 Apr; 6(2):303-12. PubMed ID: 15772108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A permutation test for comparing ROC curves in multireader studies a multi-reader ROC, permutation test.
Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 2006 Apr; 13(4):414-20. PubMed ID: 16554220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Combining dependent tests to compare the diagnostic accuracies--a non-parametric approach.
Yang Y; Jin Z
Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1239-50. PubMed ID: 16158406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hierarchical models for ROC curve summary measures: design and analysis of multi-reader, multi-modality studies of medical tests.
Wang F; Gatsonis CA
Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):243-56. PubMed ID: 17340598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction accuracy of a sample-size estimation method for ROC studies.
Chakraborty DP
Acad Radiol; 2010 May; 17(5):628-38. PubMed ID: 20380980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Paired ROC Curves through a Two-Stage Test.
Yu W; Park E; Chang YC
J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(5):881-902. PubMed ID: 24905904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A parametric comparison of diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic groups.
Xiong C; van Belle G; Miller JP; Yan Y; Gao F; Yu K; Morris JC
Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17763377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A global goodness-of-fit test for receiver operating characteristic curve analysis via the bootstrap method.
Zou KH; Resnic FS; Talos IF; Goldberg-Zimring D; Bhagwat JG; Haker SJ; Kikinis R; Jolesz FA; Ohno-Machado L
J Biomed Inform; 2005 Oct; 38(5):395-403. PubMed ID: 16198998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Verification of modified receiver-operating characteristic software using simulated rating data.
Shiraishi J; Fukuoka D; Iha R; Inada H; Tanaka R; Hara T
Radiol Phys Technol; 2018 Dec; 11(4):406-414. PubMed ID: 30244314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measurement error and confidence intervals for ROC curves.
Tosteson TD; Buonaccorsi JP; Demidenko E; Wells WA
Biom J; 2005 Aug; 47(4):409-16. PubMed ID: 16161800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Bayesian hierarchical non-linear regression model in receiver operating characteristic analysis of clustered continuous diagnostic data.
Zou KH; O'Malley AJ
Biom J; 2005 Aug; 47(4):417-27. PubMed ID: 16161801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimum-norm estimation for binormal receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
Davidov O; Nov Y
Biom J; 2009 Dec; 51(6):1030-46. PubMed ID: 19894216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multireader receiver operating characteristic studies: a comparison of study designs.
Obuchowski NA
Acad Radiol; 1995 Aug; 2(8):709-16. PubMed ID: 9419629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of correlated ROC areas in diagnostic testing.
Song HH
Biometrics; 1997 Mar; 53(1):370-82. PubMed ID: 9147602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tests of equivalence and non-inferiority for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired areas under ROC curves.
Liu JP; Ma MC; Wu CY; Tai JY
Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1219-38. PubMed ID: 16158400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A conditional nonparametric test for comparing two areas under the ROC curves from a paired design.
Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 2005 Mar; 12(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 15766688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relationship between Roe and Metz simulation model for multireader diagnostic data and Obuchowski-Rockette model parameters.
Hillis SL
Stat Med; 2018 Jun; 37(13):2067-2093. PubMed ID: 29609206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation and statistical power comparison of methods for analyzing free-response observer performance studies.
Chakraborty DP
Acad Radiol; 2008 Dec; 15(12):1554-66. PubMed ID: 19000872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative statistical properties of expected utility and area under the ROC curve for laboratory studies of observer performance in screening mammography.
Abbey CK; Gallas BD; Boone JM; Niklason LT; Hadjiiski LM; Sahiner B; Samuelson FW
Acad Radiol; 2014 Apr; 21(4):481-90. PubMed ID: 24594418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
