BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25355477)

  • 1. Standing genetic variation in host preference for mutualist microbial symbionts.
    Simonsen AK; Stinchcombe JR
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Dec; 281(1797):. PubMed ID: 25355477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Herbivory eliminates fitness costs of mutualism exploiters.
    Simonsen AK; Stinchcombe JR
    New Phytol; 2014 Apr; 202(2):651-661. PubMed ID: 24428169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An experimental and modelling exploration of the host-sanction hypothesis in legume-rhizobia mutualism.
    Marco DE; Carbajal JP; Cannas S; Pérez-Arnedo R; Hidalgo-Perea A; Olivares J; Ruiz-Sainz JE; Sanjuán J
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Aug; 259(3):423-33. PubMed ID: 19358857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Decreased coevolutionary potential and increased symbiont fecundity during the biological invasion of a legume-rhizobium mutualism.
    Wendlandt CE; Helliwell E; Roberts M; Nguyen KT; Friesen ML; von Wettberg E; Price P; Griffitts JS; Porter SS
    Evolution; 2021 Mar; 75(3):731-747. PubMed ID: 33433925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Explaining coexistence of nitrogen fixing and non-fixing rhizobia in legume-rhizobia mutualism using mathematical modeling.
    Moyano G; Marco D; Knopoff D; Torres G; Turner C
    Math Biosci; 2017 Oct; 292():30-35. PubMed ID: 28711576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Symbiosis specificity in the legume: rhizobial mutualism.
    Wang D; Yang S; Tang F; Zhu H
    Cell Microbiol; 2012 Mar; 14(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 22168434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multiple Mutualism Effects generate synergistic selection and strengthen fitness alignment in the interaction between legumes, rhizobia and mycorrhizal fungi.
    Afkhami ME; Friesen ML; Stinchcombe JR
    Ecol Lett; 2021 Sep; 24(9):1824-1834. PubMed ID: 34110064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nitrogen addition does not influence pre-infection partner choice in the legume-rhizobium symbiosis.
    Grillo MA; Stinchcombe JR; Heath KD
    Am J Bot; 2016 Oct; 103(10):1763-1770. PubMed ID: 27671532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The evolution of symbiont preference traits in the model legume Medicago truncatula.
    Batstone RT; Dutton EM; Wang D; Yang M; Frederickson ME
    New Phytol; 2017 Mar; 213(4):1850-1861. PubMed ID: 27864973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Negotiating mutualism: A locus for exploitation by rhizobia has a broad effect size distribution and context-dependent effects on legume hosts.
    Wendlandt CE; Roberts M; Nguyen KT; Graham ML; Lopez Z; Helliwell EE; Friesen ML; Griffitts JS; Price P; Porter SS
    J Evol Biol; 2022 Jun; 35(6):844-854. PubMed ID: 35506571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evolutionary dynamics of nitrogen fixation in the legume-rhizobia symbiosis.
    Fujita H; Aoki S; Kawaguchi M
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e93670. PubMed ID: 24691447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sanctions, Partner Recognition, and Variation in Mutualism.
    Yoder JB; Tiffin P
    Am Nat; 2017 Oct; 190(4):491-505. PubMed ID: 28937817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nonnodulating Bradyrhizobium spp. Modulate the Benefits of Legume-Rhizobium Mutualism.
    Gano-Cohen KA; Stokes PJ; Blanton MA; Wendlandt CE; Hollowell AC; Regus JU; Kim D; Patel S; Pahua VJ; Sachs JL
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2016 Sep; 82(17):5259-68. PubMed ID: 27316960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mixed infections may promote diversification of mutualistic symbionts: why are there ineffective rhizobia?
    Friesen ML; Mathias A
    J Evol Biol; 2010 Feb; 23(2):323-34. PubMed ID: 20002933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Explaining mutualism variation: a new evolutionary paradox?
    Heath KD; Stinchcombe JR
    Evolution; 2014 Feb; 68(2):309-17. PubMed ID: 24303853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interspecific conflict and the evolution of ineffective rhizobia.
    Gano-Cohen KA; Wendlandt CE; Stokes PJ; Blanton MA; Quides KW; Zomorrodian A; Adinata ES; Sachs JL
    Ecol Lett; 2019 Jun; 22(6):914-924. PubMed ID: 30887662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selection for cheating across disparate environments in the legume-rhizobium mutualism.
    Porter SS; Simms EL
    Ecol Lett; 2014 Sep; 17(9):1121-9. PubMed ID: 25039752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Life histories of symbiotic rhizobia and mycorrhizal fungi.
    Denison RF; Kiers ET
    Curr Biol; 2011 Sep; 21(18):R775-85. PubMed ID: 21959168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tripartite mutualism: facilitation or trade-offs between rhizobial and mycorrhizal symbionts of legume hosts.
    Ossler JN; Zielinski CA; Heath KD
    Am J Bot; 2015 Aug; 102(8):1332-41. PubMed ID: 26290556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recombination and selection shape the molecular diversity pattern of nitrogen-fixing Sinorhizobium sp. associated to Medicago.
    Bailly X; Olivieri I; De Mita S; Cleyet-Marel JC; Béna G
    Mol Ecol; 2006 Sep; 15(10):2719-34. PubMed ID: 16911196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.